I thought Ventress was also thinking about how abandonment had happened to her in her own childhood.
Ventress was never a Sith and lacked the ability to be one.
It was the Rule of Two that prevented her from becoming one.
She would had been a sith lord in revans empire.
No.
IMHO its strayed too far away from true Star Wars.
I don't see Ventress as turning good or being redeemed, she's just sick of being betrayed in the war and wants to escape from it.
Ventress was never a Sith and lacked the ability to be one.
Doesn't wash. Sidious ordered Dooku to kill Ventress because she had become too powerful with the dark side, meaning Ventress, combined with Dooku, represented a threat to Sidious.
I agree -- nothing in these episodes suggests that Ventress is "turning good." Her choices in this latest episode weren't about abstractions like good and evil, they were about where she is right now as a person. She's just had her home and her people torn from her; she's orphaned and alone and lost. She saw a little girl in the same situation, felt a certain kinship with her, and decided she didn't want to let that happen to the kid. But she still took her share of the bounty and ransomed the kid back to her family for a second payoff. So it was hardly a heroic act, just a series of crimes that had a slightly compassionate ulterior motive. And only because she identified with that girl's situation, making it still a rather self-centered reaction. The fact that she'd help someone who reminded her of herself (and in a way that still brought her a profit) doesn't mean she'd have any qualms about hurting anyone else. It just means she's not a completely one-dimensional villain.
I agree -- nothing in these episodes suggests that Ventress is "turning good." Her choices in this latest episode weren't about abstractions like good and evil, they were about where she is right now as a person. She's just had her home and her people torn from her; she's orphaned and alone and lost. She saw a little girl in the same situation, felt a certain kinship with her, and decided she didn't want to let that happen to the kid. But she still took her share of the bounty and ransomed the kid back to her family for a second payoff. So it was hardly a heroic act, just a series of crimes that had a slightly compassionate ulterior motive. And only because she identified with that girl's situation, making it still a rather self-centered reaction. The fact that she'd help someone who reminded her of herself (and in a way that still brought her a profit) doesn't mean she'd have any qualms about hurting anyone else. It just means she's not a completely one-dimensional villain.
Her actions contrast greatly with how the Sith and dark side followers have been portrayed: as one-dimensional villains.
If she was simply selfish, why did she share the loot? Why didn't she kill Boba and leave his corpse in the box? Now he might come after her. I never said she was "heroic," but she certainly was behaving better than she would have in the past.
Frankly, she was behaving better than I would have in that situation, because I definitely would have kept all the money and I would probably have considered killing Boba as well. It's a cruel galaxy and you gotta do what you have to, to survive.
And all compassion ultimately comes from the ability to identify with other people. That's what the word means. A Sith doesn't identify with anyone and acts totally selfishly. A wannabee Sith who doesn't do that, and starts identifying with other people is turning towards the good in that they're changing and they're certainly not getting worse, so where else could they be going?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.