• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek: The Future Begins is TINO

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn't include ST:TFF as a good movie or good Trek either. In the same way that ST:TFF stunk, so did ST:TFB. But, ST:TFB was worse than TFF because it wasn't Trek, but called itself as such.
 
Obviously they've been discovered because.. FROM THE ARTICLE I POSTED A LINK TO

Aren't we touchy tonight :rolleyes:

A quick google checks says there just theories still as did that TV show The Universe, loved that show ;)

hers what my google check says

We have never discovered a white hole
White holes have long been speculated about in Science Fiction
white holes have no solid evidence to support their existence

and this too http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090401071244AA70Atp

and

In astrophysics, a white hole, or white fountain, is the theoretical time reversal of a black hole.
plus am sure it would of cropped up on the news.
 
"Captain's Log, Stardate 3113.2: We were en route to Starbase 9 for resupply when a black star of high gravitational attraction began to drag us toward it. It required all warp power in reverse to pull us away from the star but like snapping a rubber band, the breakaway sent us plunging through space, out of control to stop here, wherever we are."

Tomorrow is Yesterday.

I don't post a lot, but I have been a member of these forums for many years. Plus, I have been a Trekker since I started watching TV.
 
The true science of TOS, eh? No time-travel through black holes, you say?

"Captain's Log, Stardate 3113.2: We were en route to Starbase 9 for resupply when a black star of high gravitational attraction began to drag us toward it. It required all warp power in reverse to pull us away from the star but like snapping a rubber band, the breakaway sent us plunging through space, out of control to stop here, wherever we are."
Name the episode and series it came from. :)

Tomorrow is Yesterday...
 
But, in the end, Paramount wasn't concerned about the Trekkers, they were concerned about making a buck
Nobody will argue that. But since they're paying for it to begin with, they certainly have all the rights to do what they want. If you're so concerns about trekkers (which I consider to be a bunch of minoritary freaks fluent in Klingon, which I'm not), you are more than welcome to pay for it yourself.

they really wanted to change things so they could write more rubbish using the concepts from TOS because when it really comes down to it, they are lazy too.
I don't think it the concept that's the hardest to come with but the story itself. And they've actually down so and created a world forcing them to continue doing so. That's a welcomed renewal and I certainly am looking forward to more of thie alternate timeline. Whenever I fell nostalgic I'll always have my TOS/TNG DVD collection.
 
Obviously they've been discovered because.. FROM THE ARTICLE I POSTED A LINK TO

Aren't we touchy tonight :rolleyes:

A quick google checks says there just theories still as did that TV show The Universe, loved that show ;)

hers what my google check says

We have never discovered a white hole
white holes have no solid evidence to support their existence
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090401071244AA70Atp

In astrophysics, a white hole, or white fountain, is the theoretical time reversal of a black hole.
plus am sure it would of cropped up on the news.

I don't know a lot of stuff that should make it on the news doesn't. But I googled some stuff myself and you are right. I was wrong. Oh well it happens I'm human.

It's part of a mathematical theory, which relies on the basis that neither matter or energy can be destroyed in the universe so they theorized where is all the light energy going if it's going into a black hole. Seeing as this would destroy one of the laws of physics being the before mentioned Matter and energy can not be destoryed the theory of White Holes was created and seemingly makes sense because if the Black Holes are bleeding energy out of our universe would it have not been destoryed by now.?
 
Obviously they've been discovered because.. FROM THE ARTICLE I POSTED A LINK TO

Aren't we touchy tonight :rolleyes:

A quick google checks says there just theories still as did that TV show The Universe, loved that show ;)

hers what my google check says

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090401071244AA70Atp

In astrophysics, a white hole, or white fountain, is the theoretical time reversal of a black hole.
plus am sure it would of cropped up on the news.

I don't know a lot of stuff that should make it on the news doesn't. But I googled some stuff myself and you are right. I was wrong. Oh well it happens I'm human.

It's part of a mathematical theory, which relies on the basis that neither matter or energy can be destroyed in the universe so they theorized where is all the light energy going if it's going into a black hole. Seeing as this would destroy one of the laws of physics being the before mentioned Matter and energy can not be destoryed the theory of White Holes was created and seemingly makes sense because if the Black Holes are bleeding energy out of our universe would it have not been destoryed by now.?

No problem I love a good debate on this sort of things ;) but I guess we should get back to the topic at hand...the hatred of this movie by this cadet ;)

*pulls out verbal spanking thinking helmet*
 
Do you know how to get Deuterium? Do you know what Deuterium even is? Why is something that can be retrieved from water so hard to find in Voyager.


Man I just started bursting out laughing at this!! :guffaw:

That was too awesome.
 
The true science of TOS, eh? No time-travel through black holes, you say?

"Captain's Log, Stardate 3113.2: We were en route to Starbase 9 for resupply when a black star of high gravitational attraction began to drag us toward it. It required all warp power in reverse to pull us away from the star but like snapping a rubber band, the breakaway sent us plunging through space, out of control to stop here, wherever we are."

Name the episode and series it came from. :)

Tomorrow is Yesterday from TOS. What do I win? :)
 
"Captain's Log, Stardate 3113.2: We were en route to Starbase 9 for resupply when a black star of high gravitational attraction began to drag us toward it. It required all warp power in reverse to pull us away from the star but like snapping a rubber band, the breakaway sent us plunging through space, out of control to stop here, wherever we are."

Tomorrow is Yesterday.

I don't post a lot, but I have been a member of these forums for many years. Plus, I have been a Trekker since I started watching TV.

The true science of TOS, eh? No time-travel through black holes, you say?

"Captain's Log, Stardate 3113.2: We were en route to Starbase 9 for resupply when a black star of high gravitational attraction began to drag us toward it. It required all warp power in reverse to pull us away from the star but like snapping a rubber band, the breakaway sent us plunging through space, out of control to stop here, wherever we are."
Name the episode and series it came from. :)

Tomorrow is Yesterday...

Now, class, we can infer that a black hole is what pulled the Enterprise in, throwing it through time and space to the 1960's above Earth. Can anyone answer what happened to the Narada and the Jellyfish in the new Star Trek film?
 
btw FC had time travel, TOS had it wait every TREK had it and more worser so called science :rolleyes:
So are you comparing ST:TFB with City on the Edge of Forever?

Time travel is great, but what's the point for Nero? He didn't mean to travel back in time, but now that he has and his goal is to destroy the Federation (and he has a well armed ship with lots of photon torpedoes), what does he do? He waits for 25 years.

He waited 25 years because he was so pissed at Spock for screwing him over that he calculated when Spock would travel through time. He waited for Spock because he wanted him to suffer what he suffered (i.e. the loss of his home and those he loved).
 
Now, class, we can infer that a black hole is what pulled the Enterprise in, throwing it through time and space to the 1960's above Earth. Can anyone answer what happened to the Narada and the Jellyfish in the new Star Trek film?

Did they get married and live happily ever after ?
 
that he calculated when Spock would travel through time.

How does one calculate such things ? what type of Calculator is needed for such a thing :p and anyone says a scientific calculator I may have to roll my eyes at such a pun.
 
I don't know a lot of stuff that should make it on the news doesn't. But I googled some stuff myself and you are right. I was wrong. Oh well it happens I'm human.

It's part of a mathematical theory, which relies on the basis that neither matter or energy can be destroyed in the universe so they theorized where is all the light energy going if it's going into a black hole. Seeing as this would destroy one of the laws of physics being the before mentioned Matter and energy can not be destoryed the theory of White Holes was created and seemingly makes sense because if the Black Holes are bleeding energy out of our universe would it have not been destoryed by now.?

It was postulated as part of one internally consistent solution for black holes that preserved conservation, true. I think Hawking's work on black hole raditation (i.e., Hawking radiation), obviates the need for white holes, since the black holes eventually "evaporate." But it's all still a bit clunky because it relies on quantum mechanics to solve a relativistic problem.
 
btw FC had time travel, TOS had it wait every TREK had it and more worser so called science :rolleyes:
So are you comparing ST:TFB with City on the Edge of Forever?

Time travel is great, but what's the point for Nero? He didn't mean to travel back in time, but now that he has and his goal is to destroy the Federation (and he has a well armed ship with lots of photon torpedoes), what does he do? He waits for 25 years.

He waited 25 years because he was so pissed at Spock for screwing him over that he calculated when Spock would travel through time. He waited for Spock because he wanted him to suffer what he suffered (i.e. the loss of his home and those he loved).

the Narada was also captured by and embroiled in a battle with the Klingons. it's alluded to in the movie.
 
I don't know a lot of stuff that should make it on the news doesn't. But I googled some stuff myself and you are right. I was wrong. Oh well it happens I'm human.

It's part of a mathematical theory, which relies on the basis that neither matter or energy can be destroyed in the universe so they theorized where is all the light energy going if it's going into a black hole. Seeing as this would destroy one of the laws of physics being the before mentioned Matter and energy can not be destoryed the theory of White Holes was created and seemingly makes sense because if the Black Holes are bleeding energy out of our universe would it have not been destoryed by now.?

It was postulated as part of one internally consistent solution for black holes that preserved conservation, true. I think Hawking's work on black hole raditation (i.e., Hawking radiation), obviates the need for white holes, since the black holes eventually "evaporate." But it's all still a bit clunky because it relies on quantum mechanics to solve a relativistic problem.

Hawking is our Captain Pike During the Menagerie.. BEEP... BEEEP...
 
the Narada was also captured by and embroiled in a battle with the Klingons. it's alluded to in the movie.

Yeh a pity those scenes were cut oh well more reasons to buy the DVD ;) or to release a well priced Extended edition :drool:
 
I wouldn't include ST:TFF as a good movie or good Trek either. In the same way that ST:TFF stunk, so did ST:TFB. But, ST:TFB was worse than TFF because it wasn't Trek, but called itself as such.

Seriously, this is less a change to Star Trek than Ron Moore did with BSG yet I didn't see you use the term GINO.
Besides it's only a movie based on a TV show..not a way of life..at least not for me..

Seems to me sir, you are a Fandamentalist..

Fandamentalist (noun, pl.); fans who violently believe the only valid interpretation of any entertainment source is a dogmatic adherence to their favorite version of that source. Any change to the smallest detail is inherently unacceptable (see also "heresy") and met with frantic scorn. See also Hal Jordan and Klingons, bumpy vs, smooth.

http://kfmonkey.blogspot.com/2004/12/fandamentalism.html

:rommie:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top