Duras deserved it. I mean...come on. Who wears that brand of baldric after fall on Qo'noS?
Spoilers Star Trek: Picard General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Tuskin38
- Start date
I agree.I tend to agree. But the above is still funny.
Assuming the flashback pattern continues: By season's end, between all the flashbacks and "Children of Mars", there might actually end up being enough material to have had an entire episode set in 2385. If you cut it differently.
Can I get a planet shot saying. "Leave us alone, Abrams!" a la Robin Hood: Men in Tights?I tend to agree. But the above is still funny.
Is it really a big deal to have an action sequence so long as it makes sense to the story they are trying to tell, though? All the ones you listed have a reason to exist in those respective episodes.
One of the worst action sequences in Star Trek, IMO, is featured in Into Darkness. The movie piles on action sequence after action sequence and when we're finally given a brief second to breathe, here comes another one; only this time, for whatever reason, the Enterprise is suddenly caught in Earth's gravity. To me, that was just fucking insane.
It was, but most blockbuster films are like that these days. They even ruined the Hobbit films with that nonsense.
I guess, but, I see no reason why it shouldn't make any sense.
Ask your doctor if Nutrek is right for you.
Side effects may include: Disappointment, frustration, anger and spending too much time online complaining
That encompasses far more than the Abrams films.
Very true. But since heysec0 is using "NuTrek" to describe all Star Trek from 2009 on, might as well go with the flow...
On the other hand it offers a cure for the ennui, narcolepsy and ocular strain from the eyeroll inducing simplistic and repetitive grade school didacicism the previous generation of Trek induced. Plus, you no longer are afflicted by the desire for all clothing to be color coded and interior design to be all beige.
Exactly. There is plenty of forensic evidence that NextTrek caused the exact same symptoms when it was introduced in 1987 that NuTrek caused on its introduction. Researchers have come to the conculsion that any alteration to the Trek formula on long term users tends to have the same effect on certain groups within the overall population.
Last edited:
As big of fan as I am of TOS, I've had all those side effects with it as well.
As such, the AMA suggests any use of any variety of Trek whatever the formula or dosage come with a warning on the label.
As it was meant to. Anything post-2009 can be considered "NuTrek."
I was thinking about a joke in that vein, but you fucking nailed it better than I would have!
Similar threads
