Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 2x05 - "Fly Me to the Moon"
- Thread starter Commander Richard
- Start date
No.
These could unfortunately be fixed points in time, terrible things that happened and will happen in Star Trek’s history that shaped the far future ‘end game’ of a universal harmonious collective consciousness, the whole point could be to filter these terrible things and let them play out at an early less destructive stage of galactic development so that history never repeats itself in a negative way with lessons being learned for the future, especially when methods of causing universal destruction and Armageddon reach Doomsday machine level weaponary. Watcher’s may not be able to prevent these fixed points in time as much as they would want to do so… how would lessons be learnt for the future(s).
I'm joking
You really didn’t get my post, because bad things still happen (Hitler winning WWII). There is more than a single way to learn a lesson.
We have people protecting their preferred timeline, there is no evidence it is the better one.
I wish I followed the joke.
It does connect to the story being told as this is my fan fiction/theory explanation of the Watchers origin. The Watchers are apparently integral to this series of Picard.
Doctor Who was really good but they got a new writer a few years ago and now it is unwatchable drivel due to incompetences at all levels of it’s production. you are not missing anything…
Doctor Who can be a very convoluted show and makes up the rules as it along.
Anyway, I was just making a funny on similar terminology. But, the humor (if it was ever there) is long since gone.
I haven't watch Dr. Who since Tennet left, if not before. It was not enjoyable.
Your fan fiction/theory is nice and all. It's all stated as blunt fact and for someone who is less engaged with the material it is off putting.
Appreciate the clarification.
Not to hijack this thread, but I'm right there with 'ya.
Sorry, my imagination runs a bit wild sometimes and I get carried away…. Maybe there should be a Star Trek spin off show set in the 40th century to help clarify things?
Starring Seven of Nine and young Guinan of course…
They would need a Tardis though?
I'll leave you to it. I have no interest in Seven or Guinan or the 40th Century. Sounds too much like space fantasy for even my brain.
Seven needs to stay in the 21st century. She seems like she belongs, for the first time.
But maybe that is what we are all actually watching at the moment but we just don’t know it? This could be the whole concept behind Picard season 2, viewed through a looking glass with the help of Q in a similar vein to his ‘’Q and the Grey’ representation of the Q continuum during it’s first civil war? Maybe this is the 40th century Q continuum viewed through human eyes, and not the 21st century that we are led to believe…
So it's a big "gacha!" series?But maybe that is what we are all actually watching at the moment but we just don’t know it? This could be the whole concept behind Picard season 2, viewed through a looking glass with the help of Q in a similar vein to his ‘’Q and the Grey’ representation of the Q continuum during it’s first civil war? Maybe this is the 40th century Q continuum viewed through human eyes, and not the 21st century that we are led to believe…
Someone mentioned in an earlier thread that maybe this might not be the version of Q who has already had all of the encounters with Picard we have seen.
In other words, when he told Picard "Remember what I said when we last met? The trial never ends?".... Could this be Q following the events from Encounter At Farpoint?
"People assume that time is a strict progression from cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey stuff.”
In other words, when he told Picard "Remember what I said when we last met? The trial never ends?".... Could this be Q following the events from Encounter At Farpoint?
"People assume that time is a strict progression from cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey stuff.”
I like the new Doctor Who, so if you're going to rag on it, start a thread in that forum so I can ignore it.
