^
Because the Rommies have a parking spot in pop culture lore. The Dominion doesn't.
Because the Rommies have a parking spot in pop culture lore. The Dominion doesn't.
1. They are the best enemy ST has ever had
It's a bad idea to post an opinion as fact--especially one that would otherwise be considered a non sequitur by many..![]()
While they were a good enemy, they were NOT a TNG enemy.
Like I said the backstory is told in 4 lines ala the start of Caretaker, for those who don't know, it's not complex.Yes, a STAR TREK FAN would know this, but as my quote said, a GENERAL AUDIENCE MEMBER wouldn't and it would be confusing to them. Making a Trek movie to appeal just to Trek fans is a big mistake. It would probably bomb worse than Nemesis, imo.
Which I was not sugesting doing.However, as mentioned above, you can go overkill on the cameos
The point is killing her off was never a crazy idea, and she was a far less liked character. As for his memories, he never heard in his jumps how Deanna died, how do you know he rememberd? In any case the Troi point was a throwaway about who I'd rather see killed, not integral to my point.Uh...I'm pretty sure that Picard retained his memories from the future. And even if he didn't, it was never specifically stated either way. Plus, if the future was suppose to be destiny, how come the Ent-D was destroyed a few months after AGT? Sorry, Alt-Future reasoning doesn't work
The novel written before the movie in both cases, and the movie in this case not being based on a novel but borrowing some ideas from it.I don't know what you mean here.
Because the Rommies have a parking spot in pop culture lore. The Dominion doesn't.
If you lack the ability to distinguish opinion from fact then you shouldn't be posting here at all,
The Borg were a close rival but still not as good, the rest were not within pissing distance.
I admit I'm not as hardcore a fan as some but even I realize that they are all in one ST universe and when your talking "in show" there are no "TNG" or "DS9" enemies, there are Federation enemies.
I never meant to suggest that the general movie goer would whine at being lost. Yes, you can have your exposition that the Dominion live on the other side of galaxy connected to the Feds by a wormhole and were engaged in a long war with them. However, the Romulans don't really have the baggage that the Dominion has. Plus, they are probably better known than the Dominion.Like I said the backstory is told in 4 lines ala the start of Caretaker, for those who don't know, it's not complex.
People are not the idiots you seem to take them for they are not going to sit in their seats "Im so confused...on a point of order these are DS9 enemies...I'm so confused!"
Sorry, I inferred by your post that you were.Which I was not sugesting doing.
Well, I don't know. I am just surmising just like you are. But it seemed that Future-Picard was able to function just fine once he jumped, which, to me, logically would suggest that he has his "future-past memories." It is a tricky gray area to be sure.The point is killing her off was never a crazy idea, and she was a far less liked character. As for his memories, he never heard in his jumps how Deanna died, how do you know he rememberd? In any case the Troi point was a throwaway about who I'd rather see killed, not integral to my point.
The specific members, no probably not, but the race in general, probably.Yes Im sure the general person is intimitly aware of the various players in the Romulan Senate, how the Remans differ etcBecause the Rommies have a parking spot in pop culture lore. The Dominion doesn't.
It would be easy to set the scene for those who don't know, and you'd have a much better enemy, the Romulans are bland, uninteresting and don't even look like aliens.
"By definition?" What is that supposed to mean? The novels are written by established professional writers who are intimately familiar with the franchise and very respectful of it. You seem to be implying that it's just glorified fan-fiction.Also, I'd like to submit to the court that most novels are by definition fanboyish.
I have yet to read one that isn't.
The only things I liked about Nemesis were: bringing in Janeway for about 5 minutes and that ride that Picard had on that planet! That thing was SWEET!
So your just a smartass?
That was actually the plot outline of the DS9 relaunch with a few detailes changed. Such as the coup, which was, afterall, the plot of Nemesis.
The Dominion were one of the few decent enemies we ever saw on the show, and the Romulans were easily among the most bland, flat and uninteresting.
The Taskforce would have also been a nice way of getting VOY and DS9 into a movie that they would not pull in enough people for on their own.
Would you care to say why not, rather than rolling your eyes?
Perhaps because it wreaks of fan-boyism?
Well, with Donatra a "devious history" is incongruent with the character, and Shinzon (at least in concept) was the one thing that worked in the film. It was everything else that was the problem.She was an already introduced character with a devious history, it would have worked better in Donatra or Shinzons role, that is, if you insist on the stupid story to begin with.
Shinzon was the only element that worked? are you serious?????
It would have been a PASSABLE movie if they had a decent villan.
but a Picard clone, who looks nothing like Picard, launching a coup on Romulas, supported by romulans....no...just no.
I actually don't know how they came up with such a convolouted and ridiciouls story to begin with.
I'm glad the actors realized it too.
If you lack the ability to distinguish opinion from fact then you shouldn't be posting here at all,
Careful.
The Borg were a close rival but still not as good, the rest were not within pissing distance.
How did the Borg get into the conversation?
And just how close are those novels to the movies that they inspired? Also, that argument doesn't even work as those novels were made before the movie was produced while the DS9-relaunch was created after the DS9 series was made. When there are media tie-ins, generally, they are allowed to use any characters/settings/events that they want because they have no budget to worry about. A movie is a different animal because of that.[/quote]I think the authers of..Jurassic Park, Twister, Congo, Disclosure, Fight Club,, Angelas Ashes etc would say otherwiseBooks, novels, .....what is really turned into actual multi-million dollar movies are different.
Where to begin. For one, there is absolutely NO NEED for the Dominion to appear in a TNG film. None, whatsoever. Main reason is two-fold. They were DS9's main baddies and even if DS9 was already off the air, there was an intentional (and smart) direction to keep the 24th Century shows separate (with the occasional off-handed reference to each other).
No there wasn't. DS9 took over the Klingon arc and the cardassian arc
For two, the backstory that DS9 has with the Dominion would be insane for a general audience member to know about. That is mainly why, creatively speaking, there will never be a DS9 movie.
Sorta like explaining the backstory of the Sona, or of even Khan for the people who didn't remember him 16 years later. Or explaining the backstory of the remans. Or any Romulan cloning efforts. Insurrection gave enough backstory of the dominion war for TNG only people to have a 5 minute staff discussion to get newbies engaged enough to enjoy the movie.
Also, including characters from all over, in what appears to be at the very least strong supporting roles, would be a franchise killing move in addition to fanwankery. A cameo (like Janeway's) is fine, but beyond that would be ridiculous and overcrowd the movie. Also, DS9 and Voyager were never as popular as TNG (another reason why those series will never see a film). Having a movie that focuses on them in addition to the TNG crew would be silly as a general audience member would probably want to watch Picard and Co instead of these other yahoos.
You wouldn't have to bring in alot of people. For a pure movie, bring Worf, Obrien and Bashir on the Enterprise and you've had all actors who've played that role in the series.
And just how close are those novels to the movies that they inspired? Also, that argument doesn't even work as those novels were made before the movie was produced while the DS9-relaunch was created after the DS9 series was made. When there are media tie-ins, generally, they are allowed to use any characters/settings/events that they want because they have no budget to worry about. A movie is a different animal because of that.I think the authers of..Jurassic Park, Twister, Congo, Disclosure, Fight Club,, Angelas Ashes etc would say otherwiseBooks, novels, .....what is really turned into actual multi-million dollar movies are different.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.