• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Lower Decks 1x04 - "Moist Vessel"

Rate the episode...

  • 10 - Excellent job as usual, Commander!

    Votes: 15 12.4%
  • 9

    Votes: 21 17.4%
  • 8

    Votes: 40 33.1%
  • 7

    Votes: 24 19.8%
  • 6

    Votes: 9 7.4%
  • 5

    Votes: 4 3.3%
  • 4

    Votes: 3 2.5%
  • 3

    Votes: 2 1.7%
  • 2

    Votes: 2 1.7%
  • 1 - Pull your weight, Ensign!

    Votes: 1 0.8%

  • Total voters
    121
Had to look up what on Earth 'cis' meant there.

No one is taking umbrage, read the posts again. I was just questioning how reasonable it is to actively complain that a show that's 4 episodes in hasn't shown any gay characters yet. Especially since we've barely even seen any relationships or pining for the opposite sex.

It's reasonable to expect the sexual orientation of a show's characters to be revealed in the first four episodes, and to expect something other than blanket heteronormativity.

The terms "cis" and "cisgender" have been in popular usage for a while now.
 
I was just questioning how reasonable it is to actively complain that a show that's 4 episodes in hasn't shown any gay characters yet. Especially since we've barely even seen any relationships or pining for the opposite sex.

I don't know that I was actively complaining. I was just lamenting that it wasn't looking good. I mean, I finished it with 'Where's my Culber at?' which I was using to give it a less serious spin if anyone was feeling I was upset. Text and tone, man.

And if there happen to be no major Q+ characters, I'll be disappointed. It's not the end of the world.
 

only one person ascended as an energy being
489ab17f280e75d925d5a1cacb7a37c2.jpg
 
I think you misheard. Consider...

materialize/de-materilize
sensitize/de-sensitize
contaminate/de-contaminate

corporeal/...


cor·po·re·al

relating to a person's body, especially as opposed to their spirit.

having a body.
I did not mishear. Checking both the audio and CC, he says, "decorporation."

Next time, spare the vocabulary lesson. I did not find it informative or helpful.
 
I did not mishear. Checking both the audio and CC, he says, "decorporation."

Next time, spare the vocabulary lesson. I did not find it informative or helpful.
Interesting there is a definition regarding that phrase: (pathology, of a chemical) To remove from a (human or animal) body.

Now, I did not know this and I found it as an odd term, but it isn't entirely inappropriate.
 
Interesting there is a definition regarding that phrase: (pathology, of a chemical) To remove from a (human or animal) body.

Now, I did not know this and I found it as an odd term, but it isn't entirely inappropriate.
By virtue of containing the root "corp," it will bear resemblance to any word having to do with bodies, be they human (corporeal) or social (corporation). However, the word "decorporation" seems to have very specific legal and medical uses. I suspect that this is a malapropism that shows us just what a phony the guy is. (Indeed, don't they show he wasn't truly committed to "ascension?")
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top