• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek Into Darkness: More Explanations

Heck, I would have liked to have heard more about what people thought of Alice Eve's depiction of Carol Marcus...
It's there; I've read it. People have indeed talked about the character and the characterization, but if all you want to look for is the underwear discussion, then Lo, the underwear discussion is all you will see.
I'm not upset because the underwear scene exists at all, I'm upset because there is NOTHING ELSE ABOUT HER CHARACTER that you can talk about. Her character is nothing but a walking reference that doesn't do anything.
QED
 
Underwear on the beach is called a bathing suit. Just change the scenery, make the underwear as skimpy as possible, maybe just wide enough to cover holes and nipples and suddenly it's acceptable.

Context is very important. :lol:
 
Heck, I would have liked to have heard more about what people thought of Alice Eve's depiction of Carol Marcus, but so far the only notable thing about her that everyone seems to talk about is her freaking underwear scene.


That says more about the people than it says about the scene or Alice Eve and her character.

Indeed it does. Watching the DVD last night, the scene is just a couple of seconds. It gets blown out of proportion because most of the critics simply take the "throw everything at the wall and see what sticks" tactic. There's nothing wrong with Carol Marcus' character, and I enjoyed how Alice Eve portrayed her.

God forbid the lovely, stubborn scientist in TWOK be a younger lovely, stubborn scientist in STiD. I guess that's just too much.
 
The outrageous thing about the underwear scene is that they apparently use 21st century underwear in the future. The film is not set in the present, so Carol should have worn future underwear. Case in point, the cymbals in Nemesis. Everything in the future ought to be transparent.
 
God forbid the lovely, stubborn scientist in TWOK be a younger lovely, stubborn scientist in STiD. I guess that's just too much.

It's not. Having her character mean something on the other hand is asking too much.
 
The fact that people base Alice Eve's character on a two second glimpse of her unmentionables instead of her considerable actual contribution to the movie screams sexism. A woman is based on her sexuality, not her talent or intelligence.
 
God forbid the lovely, stubborn scientist in TWOK be a younger lovely, stubborn scientist in STiD. I guess that's just too much.

It's not. Having her character mean something on the other hand is asking too much.

That's terrible, that you only see her as a woman in her underwear. She has a brain, you know.
 
I still love how they're sticking to their "Kirk is in his underwear too!" as if that's supposed to mean they wanted to show equal skin between the genders. All you have to do is look at the scene in question that shows Kirk in his underwear to understand why that argument is complete hogwash.
In the first movie, Kirk is most definitely just as boldly in his underwear as Carol Marcus is, you can tell which hand Pine writes with, the scene is so bold. And could someone please tell me how Carol Marcus' underwear scene is anywhere near as bold as Troi or Seven of Nine in their catsuits? Troi, you can see her nipples poking through often and you can also quite clearly see an outline downline often. Seven of Nine, you can often see her nipples poking through, I don't notice Carol Marcus' nipples showing through, nor do I see an outline down below. (Plus Carol Marcus' scene was under a minute. Troi and Seven of Nine run around in their get ups for the entire episode, and there's more than one instance of a close up of them bending over)
 
God forbid the lovely, stubborn scientist in TWOK be a younger lovely, stubborn scientist in STiD. I guess that's just too much.

It's not. Having her character mean something on the other hand is asking too much.

That's terrible, that you only see her as a woman in her underwear. She has a brain, you know.

She risked her life several times for the crew of the Enterprise, willing to put herself in harms way the whole damn movie, sticking her arm right into a torpedo with a yield big enough to rip away most of the planetoid they were standing on at the time to save McCoys life.

Oh and she wears underwear, oh god the horrorz!
 
It's not. Having her character mean something on the other hand is asking too much.

That's terrible, that you only see her as a woman in her underwear. She has a brain, you know.

She risked her life several times for the crew of the Enterprise, willing to put herself in harms way the whole damn movie, sticking her arm right into a torpedo with a yield big enough to rip away most of the planetoid they were standing on at the time to save McCoys life.

Oh and she wears underwear, oh god the horrorz!

Which is the kicker. She's obviously highly intelligent, brave, and sexy. It's probably intimidating for some because that means she's like the leads.
 
She risked her life several times for the crew of the Enterprise, willing to put herself in harms way the whole damn movie, sticking her arm right into a torpedo with a yield big enough to rip away most of the planetoid they were standing on at the time to save McCoys life.

And not one second of any of that was considered trailer-worthy by the creators.:cool:

QFT... And by the by, the only other trailer worthy Marcus moment was her screaming...

That said, I loved the movie, so I'm not going to complain too loudly.
 
That's terrible, that you only see her as a woman in her underwear. She has a brain, you know.

She risked her life several times for the crew of the Enterprise, willing to put herself in harms way the whole damn movie, sticking her arm right into a torpedo with a yield big enough to rip away most of the planetoid they were standing on at the time to save McCoys life.

Oh and she wears underwear, oh god the horrorz!

Which is the kicker. She's obviously highly intelligent, brave, and sexy. It's probably intimidating for some because that means she's like the leads.

Yup, Uhura and Carol kicked more ass in this movie than a lot of Prime main characters did their entire stint in the franchise. :lol:
 
She risked her life several times for the crew of the Enterprise, willing to put herself in harms way the whole damn movie, sticking her arm right into a torpedo with a yield big enough to rip away most of the planetoid they were standing on at the time to save McCoys life.

Oh and she wears underwear, oh god the horrorz!

Which is the kicker. She's obviously highly intelligent, brave, and sexy. It's probably intimidating for some because that means she's like the leads.

Yup, Uhura and Carol kicked more ass in this movie than a lot of Prime main characters did their entire stint in the franchise. :lol:

Speaking of which, the whole Uhura/Klingon sequence on Kronos was awesome. Having re-watched it last night, I love seeing this more capable, intelligent Uhura. Poor Nichelle Nichols never got a chance to be this awesome.
 
A woman, walking up to a contingent of Klingon troops, speaking their own language back to them on their own planet and black mailing them with their own honour system without flinching. That takes someone extraordinary.

Especially when security specialist Cupcake is hiding behind a phaser rifle, flak jacket and six feet of shuttle and still wetting his bucket seat.
 
Speaking of which, the whole Uhura/Klingon sequence on Kronos was awesome. Having re-watched it last night, I love seeing this more capable, intelligent Uhura. Poor Nichelle Nichols never got a chance to be this awesome.

They let her fix a radio once. Ironically, that's about as much as Carol Marcus studying a torpedo.
 
A woman, walking up to a contingent of Klingon troops, speaking their own language back to them on their own planet and black mailing them with their own honour system without flinching. That takes someone extraordinary.

Too bad it didn't amount to anything extraordinary. When other characters do things like that, like Kirk and Spock going onto the Narada full of Romulans, they succeed. All Uhura does is delay a big fight which she also doesn't do much of anything.

I agree it was courageous of Uhura to do what she did, I just wish it amounted to something of equal value.
 
Which is the kicker. She's obviously highly intelligent, brave, and sexy. It's probably intimidating for some because that means she's like the leads.

Yup, Uhura and Carol kicked more ass in this movie than a lot of Prime main characters did their entire stint in the franchise. :lol:

Speaking of which, the whole Uhura/Klingon sequence on Kronos was awesome. Having re-watched it last night, I love seeing this more capable, intelligent Uhura. Poor Nichelle Nichols never got a chance to be this awesome.
Nichelle Nichols did get to speak Klingon once too ... Sort of.
 
Too bad it didn't amount to anything extraordinary. When other characters do things like that, like Kirk and Spock going onto the Narada full of Romulans, they succeed. All Uhura does is delay a big fight which she also doesn't do much of anything.

I agree it was courageous of Uhura to do what she did, I just wish it amounted to something of equal value.
But it was Khan's fault that it fucked up. Besides, Klingons.
 
Too bad it didn't amount to anything extraordinary. When other characters do things like that, like Kirk and Spock going onto the Narada full of Romulans, they succeed. All Uhura does is delay a big fight which she also doesn't do much of anything.

I agree it was courageous of Uhura to do what she did, I just wish it amounted to something of equal value.

I wish people would just be honest about why they dislike these films (they dislike the creators) instead of coming up with these insane reasons that don't make any sense.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top