Now you mention it, yes. But I don't think I was expecting it, that's all.
How dare a film trigger an unexpected emotional response!

Now you mention it, yes. But I don't think I was expecting it, that's all.
Yea, all that potting soil for 3 million plants, had to have played hell with the budget
Mentor/Father figures are often killed off. Pretty standard stuff in fiction.Star Trek: Into Darkness was a terrible movie for reasons that include (but are not limited to) the following:
-They killed Pike for no good reason.
If it was 1979, you might have a point.-The Klingons looked like a completely new alien.
-Khan was horribly casted. That was not Khan...
Had very little in common with TWOK. Different story.-It was a cheap imitation of Star Trek II (with some bad Insurrection elements too).
It was a decent film but not near as good as the Trek reboot. I think it would've been better had it not been a retelling of The Wrath of Khan. And I personally liked the Klingons new look. But that's just me.
STiD and ST09 are constantly jockeying for top position.
STiD and ST09 are constantly jockeying for top position.
![]()
I keed, I keed...![]()
STiD and ST09 are constantly jockeying for top position.
That poll would be found in this thread:Did TrekBBS ever conduct a poll about the 2009 film?
STiD and ST09 are constantly jockeying for top position.
![]()
I keed, I keed...![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.