Oh yeah, something I forgot to mention. Uhura ACTUALLY GOT BE A LINGUIST.
One of my favorite moments, yeah

I liked the Klingons. Hopefully we'll see more of them at some point.
Oh yeah, something I forgot to mention. Uhura ACTUALLY GOT BE A LINGUIST.
Oh yeah, something I forgot to mention. Uhura ACTUALLY GOT BE A LINGUIST.
Some of the shots were just gorgeous, too. The one where the Enterprise plummets beneath the clouds, and then rises up was just stunning.
Oh yeah, something I forgot to mention. Uhura ACTUALLY GOT BE A LINGUIST.
One of my favorite moments, yeah
I liked the Klingons. Hopefully we'll see more of them at some point.
Spock had Actual Warheads put back into the torpedoes, when they took Khans 'family' out.Oh yeah, something I forgot to mention. Uhura ACTUALLY GOT BE A LINGUIST.
Some of the shots were just gorgeous, too. The one where the Enterprise plummets beneath the clouds, and then rises up was just stunning.
I was happy that she was stronger in this one, but we still had to gratuitous butt-shot when she was approaching the Klingons. Took me out of the movie. Small complaint, but we don't need to be reminded Zoe Saldana is a beautiful woman. She shows that on-screen. I thought her performance on Kronos was great. From standing up to Kirk and demanding that she talk to them, to her conversation in Klingon with them, what was said about "honor," to the confusion over Harrison taking out every Klingon and the fear that was on her face when she approached the landing party. The suspension of disbelief during that scene was at an all-time high. I really enjoyed Kronos.
But I have a question, on another topic. Why would Khan put his crew in danger by not securing the torpedoes before he started killing people? And if they are launched, wouldn't it kill his crew? I mean, we saw the things explode, destroying the Vengeance. So didn't he put them more at risk by trying to kill Starfleet officers and NOT having the torpedoes? It's been a day and I wasn't thinking about it until this morning. So I am asking in earnest if there's something I missed.
why the writers felt so lazy as to just rehash surface beats from Star Trek II. Instead of taking important stuff (Like the depth surrounding getting old!), they just took a bunch of famous lines and used them in increasingly cheesy ways.
Or: Why did Praxis explode thirty years early?
My favorite part ( which is small, insignificant, and silly....my trek pet peeve).... They had seatbelts!! I always complain about the lack of seatbelts in Voyager...
Who are those people, and why are you linking to their blog?
Question: Is Star Dead?
Answer: No.
Moving on.
Question: Is Star Dead?
Answer: No.
Moving on.
I'm sorry, is this thread only for positive reviews?
I have no issue with negative reviews. However, I have zero patience for doomsayers.
A little makeup on the British guy, and a completely different movie.
While I disagree with your first paragraph (vehemently), I don't think this is the right place for the discussion at this time.He actually has differentiated himself from Bush. We are now shipping arms to our enemies, we are using drones more often to wack a terrorist than capturing them for intelligence purposes. There are more drone strikes under Obama then Bush, and Obama has no problem using them against citizens without due process. So there are big big differences if you pay attention.
I am glad Trek has gone back to doing social commentary, it throws the ideas out there, you don't have to agree with it, but it throws the questions out there for it to be discussed.
-Chris
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.