You just want everyone running laps like Dave Bowman.
Well, unless there is a lockout for wrong tries. You can block processes like that and require the correct code or you can't try again. Pretty easy level of protection. Plus it is something that you have to know about and have the right address to connect and probably encryption, so it isn't easy just because the code is 5 digits.Yeah, one could say "It was the 80s!", but even then I could program my Commodore PET in BASIC to cycle through all integers up to 100,000, and it would take less than a second. Presumably there was some encoding and/or security features that Kirk needed to override personally.
Now we all know the code!![]()
Anyone else think its odd that with the computing power of starships that the computer override access code for a Starfleet ship would be a simple 5 digit number? I mean how long would it have taken the Enterprise to break Reliant's code in a brute force attack? A nanosecond? It actually would have been quicker and easier to crack it than looking it up.
Just saying.
Agree. The same problem with Picard leaving Kirk's body under a pile of rocks in Generations.Why didn't Kirk and the Enterprise crew return Spock's body back to Vulcan? Why dump it on Genesis?
Why didn't Kirk and the Enterprise crew return Spock's body back to Vulcan? Why dump it on Genesis?
There was something in the novelization about Spock not wanting his body returned to Vulcan for some reason.
In the novelization, as I recall, the torpedo is seen to burn up upon entering the atmosphere. (Not sure how McIntyre resolved this in the follow-up novel; I've never looked at it.)They might also have expected that the torpedo would be incinerated on entering the Genesis planet's atmosphere...
Actually, Roddenberry addressed it himself in notes he gave to Nick Meyer on this film. I'll transcribe it sometime.@Admiral2 ah, but are Starfleet personnel military? One of the great questions of the ages. Perhaps somebody should start a thread to discuss this burning issue.
I@Admiral2 ah, but are Starfleet personnel military? One of the great questions of the ages. Perhaps somebody should start a thread to discuss this burning issue.
Kor
pThis was on a ship where the self-destruct code was 0-0-0-destruct-0.
Password security doesn't seem to be a huge priority![]()
This was on a ship where the self-destruct code was 0-0-0-destruct-0.
Password security doesn't seem to be a huge priority![]()
Yes, it's really that simple. It's a "burial at sea" in space. That's just what space navies do.Given Meyer's nautical leanings, I'm guessing it was supposed to be the equivalent of being buried at sea. They might also have expected that the torpedo would be incinerated on entering the Genesis planet's atmosphere, considering what David says in the next film about how the torpedo soft-landed due to the gravity fields being all screwed up.
IIRC, in the Trek III novelization, Kirk and Sarek figured that Spock requested burial in space in his will because he wasn't certain he'd be able to deposit his katra in someone else, being only half-Vulcan, and he figured if he was successful he (well, McCoy or Kirk or whoever) would be able to intervene and save the body. Just his luck that McCoy was "allergic" to the process so things weren't so clear-cut.There was something in the novelization about Spock not wanting his body returned to Vulcan for some reason. It's possible it was in an earlier revision of the script, but got taken out by the shooting script.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.