• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek II: Anyone else think it's odd that ...

Yeah, one could say "It was the 80s!", but even then I could program my Commodore PET in BASIC to cycle through all integers up to 100,000, and it would take less than a second. Presumably there was some encoding and/or security features that Kirk needed to override personally.
Well, unless there is a lockout for wrong tries. You can block processes like that and require the correct code or you can't try again. Pretty easy level of protection. Plus it is something that you have to know about and have the right address to connect and probably encryption, so it isn't easy just because the code is 5 digits.
 
Anyone else think its odd that with the computing power of starships that the computer override access code for a Starfleet ship would be a simple 5 digit number? I mean how long would it have taken the Enterprise to break Reliant's code in a brute force attack? A nanosecond? It actually would have been quicker and easier to crack it than looking it up.

Just saying.

This is a good question. And you're right it does seem too simple. Here's my totally manufactured answer I came up with in about the time to read this far.

Only a currently active duty Federation Star Ship can use the code, so it's not as simple as 5 digit number from anywhere. What this means is if Star Fleet sells old ships or just decommissioned some from active duty, they wouldn't be able to do this. It has to be an authorized Star Fleet Star Ship to use this so no enemy could even try this even though it's a simple code. Because it can only be an active duty ship then it's somewhat simple on purpose because the situation would mean the ship it's being used on is stolen or captured. Non Star Fleet personnel wouldn't know about it to use a captured ship to use it, being a command encrypted library using that retinal scan that Spock did when he was bending down low over his console just off camera.

Thank you, I'm here all week, remember it's a two drink minimum.
 
Why didn't Kirk and the Enterprise crew return Spock's body back to Vulcan? Why dump it on Genesis?
 
Why didn't Kirk and the Enterprise crew return Spock's body back to Vulcan? Why dump it on Genesis?

There was something in the novelization about Spock not wanting his body returned to Vulcan for some reason. It's possible it was in an earlier revision of the script, but got taken out by the shooting script.
 
I'm sure Spock would have taken all logical precautions against being interred in soil that belonged to his father. Or having his katra put in a jar on Sarek's shelf.

Perhaps he rewrote his will after ST4:TVH. Perhaps he didn't.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Given Meyer's nautical leanings, I'm guessing it was supposed to be the equivalent of being buried at sea. They might also have expected that the torpedo would be incinerated on entering the Genesis planet's atmosphere, considering what David says in the next film about how the torpedo soft-landed due to the gravity fields being all screwed up.
 
There was something in the novelization about Spock not wanting his body returned to Vulcan for some reason.
They might also have expected that the torpedo would be incinerated on entering the Genesis planet's atmosphere...
In the novelization, as I recall, the torpedo is seen to burn up upon entering the atmosphere. (Not sure how McIntyre resolved this in the follow-up novel; I've never looked at it.)
 
Perhaps Spock’s body was so radioactive from fixing the engines it was Starfleet protocol to eject into space towards either a planet’s atmosphere or a star to burn up the body.
 
@Admiral2 ah, but are Starfleet personnel military? One of the great questions of the ages. Perhaps somebody should start a thread to discuss this burning issue.

Kor
I

It has military ranks
The ships have weapons.
Starfleet fights wars


Yes it's a military.


If it's not a military then Picard has a lush head of hair.
 
Given Meyer's nautical leanings, I'm guessing it was supposed to be the equivalent of being buried at sea. They might also have expected that the torpedo would be incinerated on entering the Genesis planet's atmosphere, considering what David says in the next film about how the torpedo soft-landed due to the gravity fields being all screwed up.
Yes, it's really that simple. It's a "burial at sea" in space. That's just what space navies do.

Kor
 
There was something in the novelization about Spock not wanting his body returned to Vulcan for some reason. It's possible it was in an earlier revision of the script, but got taken out by the shooting script.
IIRC, in the Trek III novelization, Kirk and Sarek figured that Spock requested burial in space in his will because he wasn't certain he'd be able to deposit his katra in someone else, being only half-Vulcan, and he figured if he was successful he (well, McCoy or Kirk or whoever) would be able to intervene and save the body. Just his luck that McCoy was "allergic" to the process so things weren't so clear-cut.
 
The idea that putting one's katra to another head would allow one to basically just keep on living doesn't really appeal to me. The "keep on living" thing is never mentioned anywhere, after all, and we never heard of Vulcans living forever.

That McCoy became a spokesman for Spock's katra is IMHO the exceptional bit here: if deposited in the head of a fellow Vulcan, the katra would never "keep on living" or otherwise make noises. It would become but a fond memory, perhaps getting shared among the family, perhaps put in a jar on a shelf for that very purpose. But put it in McCoy, or Archer, or other weakling alien, and all hell breaks loose.

Timo Saloniemi
 
The idea of the katra was an expansion on the idea that the Vulcans were descendants of settlers from Sargon's world, and the method of preservation used for Sargon, Thalassa and Henoch was essentially the same as the Fal-Tor-whichever used to save the Vulcan minds, called Katras, into perpetuity. Those minds were first put into another head, and then ceremonially put into devices similar the spheres Sargon and company were in. The priests of Mount Seleya, whatever you call them, could then commune with the preserved minds, and use their ancient wisdom to affect Vulcan policy on just about anything.

The wrench in those works is the ENT storyline regarding Vulcans not using telepathy. How else are they supposed to effect the transfer?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top