It is obvious that Control has no sensors and definitely would never look at worlds where life might exist but not yet be technologically active.![]()
It's an older film now, but I loved how 2010 handled that for Heywood Floyd. He knows he might never see his family again, and his son will be grown by the time he gets back. They've discussed it. In the end he looks in on his son sadly before he leaves for his launch. That's that.
Discovery Paradox #1: "It doesn't feel enough like Star Trek!" "It feels too much like Star Trek!"
Discovery Paradox #2: "They should focus on characters besides TOS!" "I don't like these new characters!"
Discovery Paradox #3: "Why don't they develop these characters?" "These moments with the characters are filler!"
Discovery Paradox #4: "They should introduce new things!" "Why didn't we hear about these things in TOS or TNG?"
What do you mean his son will be grown? How long was the trip to Jupiter and back?
As far as this argument over unearned sappy emotionalism vs. good solid character moments, it really is the defining telltale. If the goodbye scenes don't resonate with you, you just don't like the show and the characters. It's not complicated. Again, its valiant and loyal that people are trying, but it just ain't there.
Precisely so. I completely agree. I feel like many of those who are not enjoying the characters (for whatever reason) try to hang on with vain hope or justification, like somehow calling it "Star Trek" will make it somehow work out.I've found over the last two years that there really is no paradox. People who don't like the show simply don't like it. They try, and it's valiant, but they are kidding themselves. If you don't like the characters and you don't like the different approach to the franchise, one or two sporadic episodes you might like are the exception, not the rule. You just don't like it. Very, very simple.
But, are you saying that "Sorrow" lacks basic story structure? If so, I disagree. It has a distinct beginning, middle, and end.Because pure setup episodes by their nature lack the structure of a story, in simple terms they don't have a beginning, middle and end, and often they feel like they are only a beginning. It's like acts one and two of an episode. It would be nice if there was at least a mini story going on within the episode so it had its own independent identity.
Two and a half years.
Not quite the same, perhaps, but this one-two punch from “The Immunity Syndrome” comes to mind.
View attachment 9123
View attachment 9124
Well said!I've found over the last two years that there really is no paradox. People who don't like the show simply don't like it. They try, and it's valiant, but they are kidding themselves. If you don't like the characters and you don't like the different approach to the franchise, one or two sporadic episodes you might like are the exception, not the rule. You just don't like it. Very, very simple.
As far as this argument over unearned sappy emotionalism vs. good solid character moments, it really is the defining telltale. If the goodbye scenes don't resonate with you, you just don't like the show and the characters. It's not complicated. Again, its valiant and loyal that people are trying, but it just ain't there.
Another fun episode recap from Super Anemic
http://superanemic.com/2019/04/12/d...80xts3RV24giNvwy0ZRXZHMC1pKex6Eviq6ETg7bjsjxg
Top secret ship on a classified mission?And would they not inform someone that discovery was in trouble?
As far as this argument over unearned sappy emotionalism vs. good solid character moments, it really is the defining telltale. If the goodbye scenes don't resonate with you, you just don't like the show and the characters. It's not complicated. Again, its valiant and loyal that people are trying, but it just ain't there
This might even be the litmus test. If you're with the characters, you're with the show.
I'm sorry, but I enjoy Discovery and my favourite bit are the characters and the casting of those characters. They regularly elevate the bits that are cheesy or melodramatic with the strength of their performance. But those goodbye scenes were just dull, overlong and wrecked the building pace of the episode. Especially when two of them featured characters we know next to nothing about, and Stamets' is to some family member we've never heard of.
Course it is, but we don't have to see it. The decision to include it in the time we had is what I'm criticising. Cutting it out would have given more time for a framing story to give the episode more of an identity of its own, involving the planet and Queenie. A bit like there was a framing story around Kaminar which wasn't just furthering the arc.Respectfully, I disagree about your point about the goodbye scenes being dull. It's unrealistic for these characters to not want to say goodbye to their families.
Furthermore, the fact that we see multiple characters saying goodbye drives home the fact that they'll be saying goodbye to the 23rd Century. Between this and the Picard Series, this is essentially the end of almost two decades of some form of Prequel Trek as Star Trek moves into a new period of taking place further in the future than it ever has before.
Course it is, but we don't have to see it. The decision to include it in the time we had is what I'm criticising. Cutting it out would have given more time for a framing story to give the episode more of an identity of its own, involving the planet and Queenie. A bit like there was a framing story around Kaminar which wasn't just furthering the arc.
On that, we agree, the finale should have been one episode. That doesn't mean I wouldn't still think some significant editing needed doing in this first half, but it would have helped with the feeling that there wasn't a whole episode here.. It should've been a two-hour episode ala "The Way of the Warrior".
Well we don't know that, and that isn't part of the in universe narrative. If that were the important thing, we'd focus on the characters we have met from this time as an audience such as Cornwell or L'Rell, rather than family members that have never been part of this story
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.