Stand alone stories. They are distinct stories without connection to each other except in relation to Kirk and Spock. I think, among other things, this did not generate interest from public, too.Star Trek Beyond ends up with about a 2.7 domestic multiplier. In comparison ST09 had a 3.4 while STID had a 3.25. So while we were worried that STB opened lower than the previous 2 releases, it actually released much closer to the previous movies than it fell short percentage wise in total domestic box office. It had much worse legs though than the previous incarnations.
STB OW / STID OW = 83%
STB Total / STID Total = 70%
STB OW / ST09 OW = 79%
STB Total / ST09 Total = 62%
The low multiplier surprises me. I never expected Star Trek to start to resemble a frontloaded franchise given its demographic. The movie clearly did not resonate with the general audience. Despite the good reviews the movie never received "must see" word of mouth. It was "fun" but "forgettable" flick and without any real hook it quickly got lost in the summer movie shuffle.
The low multiplier surprises me. I never expected Star Trek to start to resemble a frontloaded franchise given its demographic. The movie clearly did not resonate with the general audience. Despite the good reviews the movie never received "must see" word of mouth. It was "fun" but "forgettable" flick and without any real hook it quickly got lost in the summer movie shuffle.
So it's down, again... Like 20%. Ouch!
Watching the film again last night confirmed it as a winner for me, but I sure am getting sick of Bad Robot's current way of doing bonus content. Two discs of extras and I feel like I barely saw anything of note. There's no depth to any of it, it's just like the EPK fluff you get before a film's release.
I watched all of it except the commentary. And I doubt it's Paramount, as Bad Robot's Force Awakens extras are pretty much the same.Probably Paramount deciding how the bonus content is divided up.
Remember the good old days when you could just buy a reasonably priced disc with just the film on, or a more expensive 'special edition' with all the extras, maybe on two discs?
Remember the good old days when you could just buy a reasonably priced disc with just the film on, or a more expensive 'special edition' with all the extras, maybe on two discs?
Meh. I'm getting the film, which is the important part for me.
Me too. Unless there's some interesting documentary on the extras, I'm not really bothered about them. Splitting the different extras across the various releases is what pisses me off. Just pure greed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.