The US didn't exist in 1716.Well I suppose if you transferred a soldier from 1716 to 2016 he might argue the US Navy/US Army etc is not a military organisation either. The passage of time changes how organisations are operated.
The US didn't exist in 1716.Well I suppose if you transferred a soldier from 1716 to 2016 he might argue the US Navy/US Army etc is not a military organisation either. The passage of time changes how organisations are operated.
And the Federation doesn't exist now. See how that works?The US didn't exist in 1716.
And the Federation doesn't exist now. See how that works?
Although, to be fair, he DEFINITELY wouldn't refer to the navy as "military" since in the 18th century the word "military" referred almost exclusively to land armies and not to sailors.
In this case it's similar. Starfleet's modeled after NASA, not the navy.
Starfleet was founded in the 22nd century; none of its founding members fought in World War II (or III for that matter).no it modeled after the Navy by people who served in the military in World War II
And From STID and Star Trek Beyond where Scotty explicitly says it.the Starfleet is not a military stuff was from TNG onward
Starfleet was founded in the 22nd century; none of its founding members fought in World War II (or III for that matter).
that's right the place was empty, undiscovered, not a soul in sight. Whatever it was called the Royal Navy was in charge of the seas right?The US didn't exist in 1716.
that's right the place was empty, undiscovered, not a soul in sight. Whatever it was called the Royal Navy was in charge of the seas right?
Naval aviators, if we are going to be technicalYes, and in the Navy pilots are referred to as aviators. They say that in "The Right Stuff".
The people who ORGINALLY made the show aren't involved with it anymore (most of them are dead). Various aspects of the Star Trek universe have been fleshed out in more detail since the 1960s, and one of those details is the fact that Starfleet traces its lineage, not to 20th century Earth navies or militaries, but to a NASA-like organization in the 22nd century that was and is non-military in nature.By the people who made the show.
Several, in fact. The conclusion we came to at the time was that the status in the reboot films was somewhat ambiguous, while its status in the TOS movies was implicitly military in nature.Naval aviators, if we are going to be technical
Also, don't we have a whole thread on Starfleet and it's military status?
Naval aviators, if we are going to be technical
Also, don't we have a whole thread on Starfleet and it's military status?
What! Canon is fixed in stone?!.... say it aint so.!Several, in fact. The conclusion we came to at the time was that the status in the reboot films was somewhat ambiguous, while its status in the TOS movies was implicitly military in nature.
Of course, Picard made it canon in TNG "Peak Performance" and Scotty made it canonical in STB so it's not really open for debate anymore outside the realm of head canon.
What! Canon is fixed in stone?!.... say it aint so.!
Until a different scriptwriter comes along.....lol The Star Trek stone is like a spongeI believe it's in the very nature of canon to be "set in stone"...
Until a different scriptwriter comes along.....lol The Star Trek stone is like a sponge
Just because something is etched in stone doesn't mean you can't change it:Until a different scriptwriter comes along.....lol The Star Trek stone is like a sponge
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.