so do you guys want Beyond to end on a cliffhanger or do you think they should tie up everything nicely in a neat little bow? cause i'm hoping for a trek 4.
You don't need a cliffhanger to have a sequel. All you need is a successful movie. Heck, plenty of movies that had definitive endings were then given sequels in spite of it, like the first four
Planet of the Apes movies. The second of those ended with the whole world being destroyed, but they still managed to retcon in a sequel. (The only one of the original PotA films that was deliberately left open-ended to allow for a sequel was the fifth one -- i.e. the one that didn't have a sequel.)