And here I was thinking this thread would finally answer the question of whether the Kelvin Timeline movies are Good or Not Good. Oh well! I guess we'll all just have to continue debating it until we die. 

The production values are not what make the films good, in my opinion. Updated looks and expansive FX are expected in most contemporary filmmaking, especially in this tent pole era that we are currently living in.As I believe you have pointed out many times, the majority of "Star Trek Fans" like the new films.
These are absolutely retro films, but granted with a modern production style, the modern style being face paced action, and updated look and massive amounts of special FX. That's not evolution though. That's just making these movies like all their generic contemporaries.
You had one job, thread, one job!And here I was thinking this thread would finally answer the question of whether the Kelvin Timeline movies are Good or Not Good. Oh well! I guess we'll all just have to continue debating it until we die.![]()
As I believe you have pointed out many times, the majority of "Star Trek Fans" like the new films.
These are absolutely retro films, but granted with a modern production style, the modern style being face paced action, and updated look and massive amounts of special FX. That's not evolution though. That's just making these movies like all their generic contemporaries.
TrekMovie has a new article about Star Trek Beyond's lukewarm performance at the box office.
It all comes out to this:
Production Budget: $185,000,000
Marketing Budget: $120,000,000
Total Gross: $336,756,543 (so far)
"Is Beyond is in the Red? Most Likely"
"Beyond had a budget of $185 million, with an additional $120 million spent on marketing the film. That alone would bring the money spent on production and marketing to $305 million. With an estimated final haul of just over $346 million, it would seem that Beyond is $41 million in the black."
"Hollywood earnings in China can vary between $0.25 to $0.50 on the dollar. Based on Beyond’s $65.8 million Chinese haul, the amount Paramount takes home may vary from $16.4 to $32.9 million, enough to nearly erase Beyond’s perceived profitability. Many other countries, including Russia, operate the same way to protect their local film industries. The point to take home is that the total international earnings for a film do not represent what Paramount actually receives."
"When Paramount partners with a company like Skydance Media (formerly Skydance Productions), Paramount is accepting a percentage of the production and marketing budget from a company that exists to finance film and television. Skydance, and similar companies, raise funds and partner with the big studios to co-produce and co-finance productions. However, that money is not a free loan. Paramount will owe Skydance interest on what the company advanced, in addition to any money owed in a profit-sharing agreement that it almost certainly written into Skydance’s contract with Paramount."
"In addition to Skydance, IMDbPro indicates that Paramount had six additional partners in producing Beyond: Hong Kong’s Alibaba Pictures Group, China’s Huahua Media & Culture, and Bad Robot, Sneaky Shark, and Perfect Storm Entertainment in the United States. Additionally, Paramount had eight partners helping to distribute the film internationally."
"All of these companies are likely involved in a profit-share agreement with Paramount, and will be owed money."
"Star-Trek-Beyond gets another month in China"
Interesting, do we think that's enough to push the final take to $350 million? Then some of us fanboys can claim that it's broken even after all?
Interesting, do we think that's enough to push the final take to $350 million? Then some of us fanboys can claim that it's broken even after all?
They need to evolve. Star Trek needs to evolve. That's the only way it will feel fresh and different.The recent Star Trek movies just aren't fresh. They look great, but there is nothing setting them apart from other summer blockbuster movies. There's no originality in them.
Thankfully, I think Discovery will take a different approach and attempt to evolve Trek.
That's a good point. Where did that $120 million go? There were like two trailers and a teaser, and...billboards?I can't believe marketing of this movie costed 120 millions![]()
I'm sure there's more to marketing than billboards and trailers. What we see is only the tip of the iceberg.That's a good point. Where did that $120 million go? There were like two trailers and a teaser, and...billboards?
Oh of course. I'm being a little facetious because I think the marketing for Star Trek Beyond didn't reflect its importance, this being the 50th anniversary and whatnot.I'm sure there's more to marketing than billboards and trailers. What we see is only the tip of the iceberg.
I DIDN'T GET ANY STAR TREK SUSHI!!!And sushi. From what I hear the professional Star Trek filmmakers enjoy the sushi.![]()
Same thing happened to Beyond.And you'll have the self-chosen few who deem themselves the protectors of "Gene's Vision", come rushing to piss on it as soon as possible. Just like you had a few grading Into Darkness an 'F', weeks before it opened.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.