• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers STAR TREK BEYOND

And here I was thinking this thread would finally answer the question of whether the Kelvin Timeline movies are Good or Not Good. Oh well! I guess we'll all just have to continue debating it until we die. :rolleyes:
 
As I believe you have pointed out many times, the majority of "Star Trek Fans" like the new films.

These are absolutely retro films, but granted with a modern production style, the modern style being face paced action, and updated look and massive amounts of special FX. That's not evolution though. That's just making these movies like all their generic contemporaries.
The production values are not what make the films good, in my opinion. Updated looks and expansive FX are expected in most contemporary filmmaking, especially in this tent pole era that we are currently living in.

What differentiates Star Trek from Fast and Furious is the characters and what they are going through.
And here I was thinking this thread would finally answer the question of whether the Kelvin Timeline movies are Good or Not Good. Oh well! I guess we'll all just have to continue debating it until we die. :rolleyes:
You had one job, thread, one job!
 
The recent Star Trek movies just aren't fresh. They look great, but there is nothing setting them apart from other summer blockbuster movies. There's no originality in them. I don't know what is needed to make them more profitable. I don't think they will ever be more profitable than Into Darkness. It needs a good story and a smaller budget and the acceptance Star Trek will never be the 750 - 1 billion Dollars franchise in my opinion.
 
As I believe you have pointed out many times, the majority of "Star Trek Fans" like the new films.

These are absolutely retro films, but granted with a modern production style, the modern style being face paced action, and updated look and massive amounts of special FX. That's not evolution though. That's just making these movies like all their generic contemporaries.

They're retro, yet they are just like all their contemporaries...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
"Star-Trek-Beyond gets another month in China"

Interesting, do we think that's enough to push the final take to $350 million? Then some of us fanboys can claim that it's broken even after all?
 
It won't break even in cinemas. Not even if it gets another year in China.

TrekMovie has a new article about Star Trek Beyond's lukewarm performance at the box office.

It all comes out to this:

Production Budget: $185,000,000
Marketing Budget: $120,000,000

Total Gross: $336,756,543 (so far)

"Is Beyond is in the Red? Most Likely"

"Beyond had a budget of $185 million, with an additional $120 million spent on marketing the film. That alone would bring the money spent on production and marketing to $305 million. With an estimated final haul of just over $346 million, it would seem that Beyond is $41 million in the black."

"Hollywood earnings in China can vary between $0.25 to $0.50 on the dollar. Based on Beyond’s $65.8 million Chinese haul, the amount Paramount takes home may vary from $16.4 to $32.9 million, enough to nearly erase Beyond’s perceived profitability. Many other countries, including Russia, operate the same way to protect their local film industries. The point to take home is that the total international earnings for a film do not represent what Paramount actually receives."

"When Paramount partners with a company like Skydance Media (formerly Skydance Productions), Paramount is accepting a percentage of the production and marketing budget from a company that exists to finance film and television. Skydance, and similar companies, raise funds and partner with the big studios to co-produce and co-finance productions. However, that money is not a free loan. Paramount will owe Skydance interest on what the company advanced, in addition to any money owed in a profit-sharing agreement that it almost certainly written into Skydance’s contract with Paramount."

"In addition to Skydance, IMDbPro indicates that Paramount had six additional partners in producing Beyond: Hong Kong’s Alibaba Pictures Group, China’s Huahua Media & Culture, and Bad Robot, Sneaky Shark, and Perfect Storm Entertainment in the United States. Additionally, Paramount had eight partners helping to distribute the film internationally."

"All of these companies are likely involved in a profit-share agreement with Paramount, and will be owed money
."
 
It's roughly close or just under to break- even. In Hollywood movie terms that's $10s of millions. It had to make $300 million + to build on to make a decent amount from secondary revenue.. Where the vast majority of films actually make profit. Currently beyond is the number 1 digital download on iTunes and number 4 bluray on Amazon.com one month before it's release, for example.

So the real question is.. Will this increase the China theater count, because it's very small now. There are no details about that yet. If it does, then it'll possibly add maybe $5 or $10 million to the China total. If not it'll be a negligible effect.

Beyond is actually over $337 million, they just don't update Beyond foreign as quickly now.

I chastised trekmovie.com a few days ago about their incomplete box office Roundup. However, their upper estimate of $360 million for Beyond seems unlikely.

RAMA

"Star-Trek-Beyond gets another month in China"

Interesting, do we think that's enough to push the final take to $350 million? Then some of us fanboys can claim that it's broken even after all?
 
Interesting, do we think that's enough to push the final take to $350 million? Then some of us fanboys can claim that it's broken even after all?

Why does it take being a "fan boy" to acknowledge if the movie breaks even? I think that somewhere in the $350 million range would put it in break even territory (based on the vague knowledge we have of Hollywood accounting). Making the rest of the post-theater run revenue, profit for the film. Whether Paramount and their financing partners will see this as enough of a sign to go with a fourth film, only they know.

I don't understand people that actively root for Star Trek to fail.
 
The recent Star Trek movies just aren't fresh. They look great, but there is nothing setting them apart from other summer blockbuster movies. There's no originality in them.
They need to evolve. Star Trek needs to evolve. That's the only way it will feel fresh and different.

Thankfully, I think Discovery will take a different approach and attempt to evolve Trek.
 
Thankfully, I think Discovery will take a different approach and attempt to evolve Trek.

And you'll have the self-chosen few who deem themselves the protectors of "Gene's Vision", come rushing to piss on it as soon as possible. Just like you had a few grading Into Darkness an 'F', weeks before it opened.
 
Honestly 120 mil seems to be wasted money with what we got, especially considering the sponsors. And for realz, the asian marketing was the best.
 
Wasn't there a bunch or tie-in marketing with model ships and stuff at fast food joints? That doesn't just happen. And surely you'd have to count all the standees and posters and stuff in theaters before release, and I'm sure there was other stuff that doesn't get mentioned.

And sushi. From what I hear the professional Star Trek filmmakers enjoy the sushi. :techman:
 
And you'll have the self-chosen few who deem themselves the protectors of "Gene's Vision", come rushing to piss on it as soon as possible. Just like you had a few grading Into Darkness an 'F', weeks before it opened.
Same thing happened to Beyond.

And, honestly, I'm still waiting for Discovery to show me that it will be different.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top