It's clearly SJW pandering. They're just trying to meet a diversity quota by casting women in the roles of female characters.
Women, always taking men's jobs!!!!!!![]()
Are they though? Trek only runs into this problem because of their near-obsession with doing prequel material. On the other hand, Rogue One shows that you can totally make a new story match the look of a decades old property without issue.I don't know. The practical realities are the same.
The thing about Star Wars, the OT especially, is that most of what we saw was meant to be outdated in-universe. So a modern production can go back to the 1970s designs and get away with it.Rogue One shows that you can totally make a new story match the look of a decades old property without issue.
Are they though? Trek only runs into this problem because of their near-obsession with doing prequel material. On the other hand, Rogue One shows that you can totally make a new story match the look of a decades old property without issue.
In the interior of Federation space, it is probably safe with transportation/trade being the main space vessels. Important planets probably rely on fixed planetary and orbital defenses, and not on spaceship defenses. I think there were only about 12 Starships at least on the frontiers to handle the dangerous explorations, the important investigations, the frontier patrols and the military role. Every time a outer Federation planet, colony, outpost or SS type spaceship was in real danger, there is never any evidence of any local spaceship defenses, just shuttle-size stuff. No, they have to wait for a Connie to warp in. Sometimes they even had to wait days to months. If there were many other class ships that have significant military power, why are they waiting for help. I see them like today's aircraft carrier fleet where you deploy one or two aircraft carriers and their support task forces to a trouble spot, but in the TOS era, you deploy just one or two Starships to a trouble spot (without any other support ships; they couldn't keep up the Enterprise away). The Connie Starships are very special and rare ships.According to TOS, there were only 12 Connies in the 2260s, so I doubt the Connie was the the only ship class in service. That wouldn’t be enough to patrol Federation space.
What the Temporal Cold War giveth, the Temporal Cold War taketh away?I can't remember. Did ENTERPRISE ever explain why we didn't see the Suliban or the Xindi running around in Kirk's time?
(Besides the obvious, real-life reason that they hadn't been invented yet.)
And I totally get that argument. I'm just one of the people who believes that you can fully embrace the TOS aesthetic without sacrificing your ability to do "new 'n cool".Although one could argue that there was kinda of quantum leap in SF production values between "The Cage" and STAR WARS. And that, to some degree, DISCO had to catch up with the sort of snazzy modern SF visuals--complete with holographic displays--that modern audiences have come to expect from SF movies and TV show in the post-STAR WARS era.
...But wait, isn't a quantum leap actually an extremely small advancement?![]()
Nah, Quantum Leap was a TV series starring...wait a minute, is Enterprise just a Quantum Leap episode?...But wait, isn't a quantum leap actually an extremely small advancement?![]()
It's true.Any and all CANNNON DISCREPANCIES can be explained vis-à-vis THE AUGMENT VIRUS. It mutates a lot.
To me it's a matter of balance. Lean too hard on visuals and not a single thing adds up, not even TOS to TOS. Go to the other side and only the events matter and miss out on the technology and the pieces that fill out the world. On top of that is the inescapable reality that this is a media production and an art form that will be informed by its creators.
For my money, Star Trek is not as consistent as many would like it to be, from TMP to TNG and onward. Discovery is simply one more cog in the machine. I personally can use my head canon well enough to explain the differences to suit personal interest. This will vary from person to person and, after reading this thread, I'm skeptical that anyone will change.
You could play a drinking game with the word canon during the Discovery Blu-ray extras. (But you'll be wrecked by the end of them.)They really are gung ho for the Canon at CBS.
According to a Trekdocs thing I cannot find right now, the original plan was to introduce the Suliban as nomads in the final season of Voyager, and explain that the Borg annihilated their homeworld in the 23rd century.I can't remember. Did ENTERPRISE ever explain why we didn't see the Suliban or the Xindi running around in Kirk's time?
(Besides the obvious, real-life reason that they hadn't been invented yet.)
I am curious how they plan to depict 2399 as more advanced than Discovery in The Picard Show. Now holograms, Nemesis-style forcefields, androids, site-to-site beaming and a working infinite speed drive exists in "The Cage" era, what difference will there be?I don't know. The practical realities are the same. How do you keep a vintage franchise from looking dated to modern audiences? You keep up with the times and the expectations of the present generation.
If that means fudging the "canon" sometimes, so be it.
There are no androids in DSC, also there were androids in TOS.androids
All of those things existed in TOS or TAS in some form.I am curious how they plan to depict 2399 as more advanced than Discovery in The Picard Show. Now holograms, Nemesis-style forcefields, androids, site-to-site beaming and a working infinite speed drive exists in "The Cage" era, what difference will there be?
They'll put quantum in the front of a few words and make up a new warp scale. The usual stuff.I am curious how they plan to depict 2399 as more advanced than Discovery in The Picard Show. Now holograms, Nemesis-style forcefields, androids, site-to-site beaming and a working infinite speed drive exists in "The Cage" era, what difference will there be?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.