I think TV trek, especially on streaming services only, and movie trek still have a different audience. .with the latter being far bigger and diverse.
For those of us who watch and follow TV trek it might seem a given that it's enough popular but truth is, most of my friends or people I know who watched and enjoyed kelvin trek don't even know discovery&co exist, and the few who do wouldn't be interested about a discovery or prime trek movie, especially if mutually exclusive with kelvinverse trek, because they think they can get that stuff on TV while the movies are for the other cast/verse that you don't currently have on TV.
Tbh I think cbs is already risking over saturation with all those series they are apparently planning. It seems a most expensive investment too.
For those of us who watch and follow TV trek it might seem a given that it's enough popular but truth is, most of my friends or people I know who watched and enjoyed kelvin trek don't even know discovery&co exist, and the few who do wouldn't be interested about a discovery or prime trek movie, especially if mutually exclusive with kelvinverse trek, because they think they can get that stuff on TV while the movies are for the other cast/verse that you don't currently have on TV.
Tbh I think cbs is already risking over saturation with all those series they are apparently planning. It seems a most expensive investment too.
I think there's still a market for cinematic Trek, and that market stands seperately in part to the TV shows. And, honestly, needs to be treated as such. That's where I feel the Kelvin timeline is a perfect solution. It let's film makers play with some of the toys, Kirk and crew etc, without being strictly beholden to what's going on on TV.