Deaf audiences wouldn't hear the 'canon' go off anyway.
That was a cheap shot, but I couldn't resist.
That was a cheap shot, but I couldn't resist.
There was, in a deleted scene -- after Gorkon and his party beam aboard the Enterprise-A and Kirk says, "Well, perhaps there's time for a quick tour," a scene that followed immediately afterward showed Gorkon's party visiting one of the Enterprise's science labs during the tour, where they're very prominently shown how the gaseous anomaly cataloguing-equipment operates.
However, this would've obviously telegraphed the entire final end-battle resolution ("Anton Chekhov's Gaseous Planetary Anomaly-Sensors") far ahead of time, so it was wisely deleted by Nicholas Meyer during the editing-process.
That said, even without that deleted sequence, why would the Enterprise possessing the same scientific equipment as the Excelsior be any real surprise to anyone who's watched the various TV shows over the decades? As we've been shown, Federation starships often have overlapping mission-profiles, and a cruiser as large as the Enterprise-A would have the same superb science-lab facilities as its predecessor, which would likely include equipment for cataloguing gaseous anomalies, if it was ever called for.
I do not understand how deleting a laboratory scene would in any way spoil the plot. Sulu's log entry mentioned his gaseous anomaly mission. If Enterprise-A were doing the same thing (even occasionally) then the lab scene would simply have confirmed that more than one Federation starship was performing this activity.
I heard it was a last minute chnge and it was supposed to be the excelsior that fire the homing torpedo. But shatner refused to let sulu save the day. Though goodness knows.
Nope. The unrevised 5th draft of the script, dated December 28, 1990, has Enterprise firing the homing torpedo.
"I've been dead before" / "If they did, we would all have to turn ourselves in". The characters, especially the TOS regulars, kept doing comic send-ups on their characters throughout the movie.
That is how I always took it as well. I thought the humor in this film, though subtle, was actually enjoyable and well done, as well as keeping in with the characters.I thought those were pretty subtle and in-character bits of humor, the latter much more of a semi-serious comment and the former a good expression of how Spock had changed and become more comfortable with himself and his emotions and relationships.
Mainly, it would've placed gigantic, flashing neon lights around the fact that those sensors were going to be used later in the film that the audience would've spotted a mile away -- massive telegraphing/lampshading, basically. Cutting that scene was a wise move.I do not understand how deleting a laboratory scene would in any way spoil the plot. Sulu's log entry mentioned his gaseous anomaly mission. If Enterprise-A were doing the same thing (even occasionally) then the lab scene would simply have confirmed that more than one Federation starship was performing this activity.
Mainly, it would've placed gigantic, flashing neon lights around the fact that those sensors were going to be used later in the film that the audience would've spotted a mile away -- massive telegraphing/lampshading, basically. Cutting that scene was a wise move.
I don't care why they had it on board just as long as they shoved one up Chang's tailpipe. I usually don't understand any of the Stark Trek technobabble. Seems like in various incarnations of Star Trek they're always screwed, then somebody spits out some last minute solution that I don't understand at all, I take their word for it that they know what they're talking about, it works and I leave with a smile on my face. At least this one made some kind of sense to me, even as an 11 year old. Something about tracking gaseous whatchamacallits, a tailpipe, it homes in and blows the guy up. Good enough for me. I didn't need a tour of the laboratory earlier in the film to believe the crew of the Enterprise could pull some last minute miracle solution out of their butts. They could have said "Reverse the polarity on the flux capacitor and engage the caterpillar drive" for all I cared. It was a fun time at the movie theater.
In the final battle with Chang's stealth-scout, why do Enterprise-A and Excelsior never fire their phasers?
The real-life reason? No money in the budget.
TUC is a movie that was made on the tightest of budgets, was canceled once and was very nearly on the brink of death on at least one other occasion. There are only 81 effects shots in the entire movie (and it only has that many because Meyer begged and pleaded with Stanley Jaffe for an extra two and a half million bucks on top of the $27.5 that Paramount was willing to spend; as originally budgeted I think the movie was set to have only 50 VFX shots). It's a classic case of doing a lot with very little.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.