True, and in that specific DS9 example that tug was towing an Excelsior-class ship, which would be about the size of a Galaxy saucer anyway (and possibly heavier to boot).
Mark
Mark
I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm happy it was launched at all, but that new plaque about the Enterprise-D is the 4th date it happened on!
Memory Alpha decided 'The Star Gazer' plaque meant 40125.5 (Feb 15, 2363, according to hillschmidt), backed up by 'Encounter at Farpoint' dedication plaque, maybe, I can't read it, but contradicting 40174 (March 5, 2363) when it was still being assembled over Mars per 'Booby Trap'.). 'Data's Day' counts backward 1,550 days for a July 27, 2363 commissioning. The dedication plaque in 'Silicon Avatar' had the launch locked down as 40759.5 (Oct 5, 2363). What 'The Star Gazer' plaque actually says is launched 41025.5 (Jan 10, 2364).
No wonder Captain Thomas Halloway resigned in 'The Buried Age' novel- he had to go to 3 launch ceremonies and a commissioning ceremony but never got to go anywhere!
- So, this demonstrates that Ferengi have bones in their ear pinnae? I guess that helps to explain how it can hurt if you twist it just right, but not with any real force that an actor could accidentally rip off foam rubber.
CBS still has an archive of props at least. Heck they had a product hanger from Star Trek The Experience still in storage for whatever reason (that Cardassian looking thing in the background when Picard beams down to LA in Episode 1)Did someone volunteer their collection for the shoot? I thought they got rid of all the old props.
I can't find the image now, but at one point between that CG render and when they had the same placeholder LCARS on the actual set, it was replaced with a Sovereign class.- This must have been before the final design of the Stargazer was locked down; the LCARS features a Vesta-class starship.
I mean, it probably is easy enough given we can get shark skeletons which are made of cartilage.Not necessarily, if I was displaying a Ferengi skull I would find a way to preserve the ear cartilage, or replace it with a replica. There is convenient seam transitioning from the brow to the ear. Sort of pointless to display a Ferengi skull if you can't tell what species it is at a glance.
- So, this demonstrates that Ferengi have bones in their ear pinnae? I guess that helps to explain how it can hurt if you twist it just right, but not with any real force that an actor could accidentally rip off foam rubber.
Neville Page is one of my favorite Trek designers. He has such fun ideas.On Instagram, Neville Page has been posting images and comments of the skulls and their base 3D sculptures. Here's what he said about the Ferengi:
As the Ferengi skull has been featured, I wanted to share a detail. I’ve been receiving some questions as to why we see “ear bones”. First, it’s a creative choice to make sure we recognize the skull to be a Ferengi. Second, the concept seeds the need to reverse engineer the choice biologically. Technically it is the auricular cartilage, not “bone”. And due to the scale of a Ferengi ear, this cartilage has more calcium and specialized bone cells than human cartilage. Ergo, you see it here.
At this point, we get to assume that there's been 90,000+ "ships of the line" cumulatively built and served in Starfleet across 240+ years. Thus far, anyway.
Given that DIS: "Perpetual Infinity" outright states there's 7000 active ships in the fleet in the 2250s, it's plausible there's been 90,000 in total between 2161 and 2401.
They can't all be NCC registered, since they are below the 2000s at that point.
They can't all be NCC registered, since they are below the 2000s at that poin
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.