That's insulting to the artists.It was a loveless and cheap copy & paste job. They didn't even bother to label the Zheng He.
They were rushed, the FX was only finished a week before the episode aired.
That's insulting to the artists.It was a loveless and cheap copy & paste job. They didn't even bother to label the Zheng He.
It was two torpedoes.
Wow, 1x 32nd Century Quantum Torpedo knocked the shields of Discovery off line.
That's quite the power gap.
Earth "FINALLY" has Planetary Shields of some form.
I think it's more for "Plot Armor" reasons, but the fact that Discovery Era ships looks "More Armored" then TOS era feels similar to what the US went through from WW2 to modern era where the Hull armor isn't as thick or strong, but we have other forms of Active defense to compensate for the weaker armor.I was not that impressed.
The USS Defiant (a Constitution class ship) was able to destroy 100 year old ships from the Mirror universe with 1 or 2 phaser shots of 2 seconds duration.
The power gap should be in the 'ridiculous' when comparing 32nd century and 23rd century (and yet, what we saw was maybe 100 years worth of power gap - aka 24th century).
But, in Discovery's defense, its possible the transporter sabotage device may have played a part in preventing Discovery from being destroyed (as both torpedo and transporter frequencies could have been close enough to allow the shields to at least absorb the 2 torpedoes and then collapse while still allowing moderate damage to seep through to the hull) along with the Sphere Data which already merged with the ship and was adjusting it in the background perhaps?
When they see Earth, it's in visual range, which could still be very far away.Fancy editing there, with them coming out of sporespace near Saturn and then suddenly being at Earth. Between which phrases of dialogue do we insert the hours that passed (seeing the ship was at high sublight but not quite relativistic yet)? And was UEDF comatose at the wheel when letting the heroes get that close? Also, how strong are those elephant ships, if they expect a fight with Wen's ships rather than a massacre, and can't even destroy the Discovery? Are future weapons weak because there's no dilithium to spare for making them strong, like there isn't for making them go?
Timo Saloniemi
When they see Earth, it's in visual range, which could still be very far away.
Yes, in context Rhys’s ‘big’ line doesn’t make sense. I was expecting to see a much larger ship than something that fits in Discovery’s shuttlebay.
Why didn’t she just stay with Book the whole time?
The whole scene with the EDF ships was awkward. First we’re told that two ships are entering orbit, but there’s clearly like five of them. Then we’re told that ‘Earth’ is firing on them, but it’s the EDF ships that are doing the firing. It sounds like the planet was doing the shooting when it clearly wasn’t.
I think it's more for "Plot Armor" reasons, but the fact that Discovery Era ships looks "More Armored" then TOS era feels similar to what the US went through from WW2 to modern era where the Hull armor isn't as thick or strong, but we have other forms of Active defense to compensate for the weaker armor.
Fair enough, but at this point, even moderately armed Shuttles are a danger to Discovery.Agreed to a point, but you have to understand that just because the armor of a TOS ship isn't as thick as the one on new ships, it doesn't mean the new armor/hull wouldn't be far superior... technical efficiency allows us to do more with less... and I would imagine that since Federation was using Duranium and Tritanium in ship construction, both materials underwent advancements which would allow the Federation to create say paper-thin hull if they wanted in 24th century and beyond, but with flexibility, durability, adaptability and strength of the material being hundreds of times (if not thousands of times) superior to those found on TOS era ships (we've seen something similar 'In the Mirror Darkly' when the NX-01 class ship attacked the USS Defiant... sure, the Defiant rocked etc... but there was 0 visible damage to the hull).
Simply because of sheer advancement that would occur in 930 years (heck, even if you assume technology 'stalled' at a point when The Burn happened, that would still leave 810 years of massive advancements).
I don't think any amount of 'jiggling' here of plot armor would allow a 23rd century ship (or for that matter 29th century ships) to survive a single Quantum torpedo from the 31st century.
This is why I think the only way we could 'possibly' justify it is that we know shields can nullify weapons if adjusted to appropriate frequencies.
We know Adira installed a device that tapped directly into Disco's shields which prevented inspectors from beaming off (and those personal transporters would be able to pass through Disco's shields regardless because we know that powerful enough transporter beams can penetrate weaker shields with brute force alone - aka signal strength - or with adjusting frequencies to do so)... so I'm inclined to think the transporter and quantum torpedo frequencies were close enough to allow Disco's shields to absorb the 2 torpedoes but still transfer moderate damage to the hull like we saw (that, and Disco may have already started using Sphere Data to analyse and try to adapt itself to the new technology it encountered - it had Booker's ship in its shuttlebay after all - it would be a nascent stage at best, but possibly enough to prevent outright destruction)... otherwise, 1 31st century (or in this case 32nd century) torpedo should be able to easily destroy Discovery.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.