• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spock & Uhura romance

Whether they were in fact more emotional than human beings is entirely open to interpretation.
Not any more. ENT canonized the notion that Vulcans are more violently emotional than humans. (And no, you can't just say ENT doesn't count because it mostly sucks. :p)
Actually, as I noted in my previous post, TNG established that long before ENT.
I think TOS beat them to it.
 
Not any more. ENT canonized the notion that Vulcans are more violently emotional than humans. (And no, you can't just say ENT doesn't count because it mostly sucks. :p)
Actually, as I noted in my previous post, TNG established that long before ENT.
I think TOS beat them to it.
TOS established that they used to be extremely violent before they built their culture on logic and suppression of emotions, and that they are still violent during Pon Farr when they can't control themselves. Whether Vulcan emotions are more violent than Human emotions was left to interpretation and wasn't spelled out until TNG.
 
What I don't get is that if the Vulcans are so volatile, how did the Romulans survive, thrive, and develop emotional responses more akin to humans.
That's a very good question and answering it would finally provide the key to "unlocking" the Romulans - making them believable and coherent as a single species, the way DS9 did for the Cardassians.
It wasn't solely the Vulcan's violent nature that threat them (themselves), it was their violent nature combined with modern weapons. Diane Duane wrote in (non-canon) Spock's World that Surak's time already possessed nuclear weapon, that they were being used in warfare and that the Vulcans had recently, from his perspective, tested a antimatter weapon on a near-by world. This was partly what spurred Surak philosophy.

The Romulans may very well kill each other with near abandon, just not large numbers using nukes. But if their violence is combined with a strong cultural sense of duty, that sense of duty may be what the Romulans use for violence control instead of non-emotions. It doesn't matter how Vulcanoid control their natures, as long as it is controlled.

As much as I like All Our Yesterdays, it doesn't really make sense. Why would Spock revert just because he's in another time? It would mean that the emotional control of all Vulcans is connected somehow, even over light years.
Just as it was in The Immunity Syndrome.
TIS comes right out and says that Spock is connected mentally with the crew of the Intrepid, enough so that he knew that the crew didn't understand what was killing them. Amok Time too, I believe, implies that Spock and T'Pring had some kind of active (low level?) mental connected, enough so that they both go into Pon Farr at the same time.

The ten thousand Vulcans who were off Vulcan when it was destroyed in the late movie, likely felt it.

Which of course means that Spock's problem was never his human side. It was his Vulcan side.
Spock's Human half might have interfered with his control, but it wasn't his Human half that needed to be controlled.

T'Girl, do you have any external references for post#199.
My post concerning a girl's extra eagerness basically was from personal observations and anecdotal, but if you go to just about any gynecological site the confirmation will be there, or a woman's issues forum. Or (smiles) you could just ask your mother, I asked mine.

On the male side of it, I figure it's either sweat gland pheromones or the scent from 'uhmm' somewhere else. There also a girl to girl side of this, called the McClintock effect, ever notice that most of your girlfriend's girlfriends all have their periods at the same time?
 
Actually, as I noted in my previous post, TNG established that long before ENT.
I think TOS beat them to it.
TOS established that they used to be extremely violent before they built their culture on logic and suppression of emotions, and that they are still violent during Pon Farr when they can't control themselves. Whether Vulcan emotions are more violent than Human emotions was left to interpretation and wasn't spelled out until TNG.
I think AOY spells it out.
 
Memory-Alpha's encyclopedia isn't canon. :lol:

We've seen...a Romulan prison camp. Have we ever heard of a Romulan colony or conquered world?

No, but it's based only on canon sources and it's written through the consensus of numerous Trekkies who I assume know what they're talking about. It's also known that the Romulans took over Remus and turned their citizens into a subclass.

Hey, if you don't agree, that's fine. I admit that we don't know much about the Romulan Empire. However, we don't even know much about the Klingon Empire and yet they were in the series a lot more than the Romulans were.

I agree, the Romulans should be in the series more often. I guess they were more expensive to make?

But they must be a power of more than just those two worlds to be taken so seriously by the Federation and the Klingons.
 
@maryh

What do you mean by "Sci-Fi" anyway? And why cast "Space Opera" as something seperate from Science Fiction (assuming by Sci-Fi you mean Science Fiction) There was a debate around these parts a while back about "Sci Fi" and many seemed to think it was a subgenre of Science Fiction that included schlocky B movies from the last Century and the low budget originals Syfy shows. To me its just shorthand for Science Fiction in general. Space Opera being a one of many sub-genres of Science Fiction.
 
Re: Space Opera

why cast "Space Opera" as something seperate from Science Fiction (assuming by Sci-Fi you mean Science Fiction)... Space Opera being a one of many sub-genres of Science Fiction.

True, Space Opera is a sub-genre of Science Fiction.
 
Why bother at this point? Everyone knows you hate new Trek. Why not just talk about old Trek and avoid the new stuff threads?

I can't stand 7 of 9 and you will almost never see me in a thread about her. I'm here to talk about Trek I like, not bitch about Trek that doesn't come up to snuff.

It's a free BBS, but really, it gets old after a while.

Well said. I don't understand why people that hate something spend so much time on forums talking about it. I can't help but wonder what poor quality of life people might have if they post so many negative posts devoted to something they don't like.

HEY! Howcome we're not yakking about Spock + Uhura anymore???? :klingon:

OK, back to the OP...

st-101-spock-uhura.jpg


How did the future Spock (Nimoy) react to seeing the romance between his younger self (Quinto) & Uhura? ...he must have been freaked out (in a stoically logical way). Or maybe he just saw them kiss & said to himself "fascinating"??

Did Spock-prime ever actually see the romance between young Spock and Uhura? How would he know about it anyway?

Since this romance never occurred in his timeline... how did the change in the timeline alter the chemistry between Spock & Uhura? ...there was never any chemistry between future Spock & Uhura...none at all.

Just because we never saw it, that doesn't mean you can rule it out as never happening off screen, so it's open to pure speculation.
 
In the original canon, Spock was betrothed (actually described in Amok Time as “more than a betrothal”) to T’Pring when he was a child. Nero’s incursion must somehow have taken care of that too.

Maybe, but maybe Spock was technically cheating on T'Pring. Or maybe fidelity to your betrothed is not required before you tie the knot. Canon has shown that Vulcans go through Pon Far starting in their late teens, so maybe they are even allowed to choose their short-term mates every 7 years until that one Pon Far that might end in getting married to the one they are betrothed to. And either way, Spock is half-human, so maybe his sex-drive also allows him to have normal human-like "anytime" relations and feel the periodic intense burning of his Vulcan blood.

And the odds are against T-Pring surviving the destruction of Vulcan, so it could mean that Spock is a completely free man now and we don't have to worry about her in the new timeline anyway.

the inappropriate teacher-student relationship made me wince

I don't think that Spock was necessarily still Uhura's teacher.

...and the public demonstration and I don't care if he was going off to possibly die. Unprofessional.

I used the think that Princess Leia was being unprofessional for an Imperial Senator and even racist when she said of Chewie, "Will somebody get this big walking carpet out of my way?" Then I remembered, her adoptive father had just died and her home planet had just blown up! I then forgave her.

Spock's mother had died and his planet had been destroyed. He had already had a violent emotional outburst on the bridge in front of everyone. He may have already decided that to leave Starfleet by then too. How professional would you care about being at that point? Give Spock a break!

The only Star Trek romance I thought they did very well was Kira-Odo. Although, I liked how they finally got Troi-Riker together in Nemesis.

Actually, Riker and Troi got back together romantically in Insurrection. They got married in Nemesis.
 
Well, what ever it was Spock and Uhura were clearly into it.

charliexhd113.jpg
charliexhd117-2.jpg

I liked the idea of the Spock-Uhura romance in the movie picked up from the little bits in the original series. The thought was clever.

And I'd like to add that since they clearly fell for each other in an alternative universe, it seems very plausible to me that they at least had some feelings for each other in the original universe, even if those feelings went unrealized. Yes, it's a little bit of retconning, but I LOVE IT!!!!!!

In my mind, I like to think that there was an attraction, a potential for something that was never was fully realized in the prime timeline through TUC. Then when they were mourning the loss of Kirk after his apparent death in 2293, Uhura and Spock realized their previously missed opportunity and began a relationship, eventually getting married. Uhura died sometime in the 24th century and afterwards Spock got remmarried in the wedding at which Picard was a guest.

So in mind, Spock/Uhura just had an opportunity to happen a lot sooner in the alternate timeline.

Uhura meeting him at a young age when he was still open to the idea is what made the difference.

It's pretty obvious, though, that Orci and Kurtzman got the idea for the relationship in the movie from watching TOS.

In fact, I believe they even stated that they did.

They're good, creative people who see the potential in these familiar things rather than treating "canon" as a straight jacket.
 
Last edited:
As much as I like All Our Yesterdays, it doesn't really make sense. Why would Spock revert just because he's in another time? It would mean that the emotional control of all Vulcans is connected somehow, even over light years.

Just as it was in The Immunity Syndrome.

His connection to Vejur in TMP also indicates that Spock can be empathically affected across enormous distances if the source is strong enough. A whole planetful of emotionally uncontrolled Vulcans would presumably do the trick.
 
T'Girl, mine is not longer alive. I have not looked into any women's fora.
I have read of the McClintock effect., but not in a primary source
 
I agree, the Romulans should be in the series more often. I guess they were more expensive to make?
Kind of hard imagining them being in the series's more than they are. Romulans were major components of the last two films and had good sized parts to play in all the TV series except Voyager.

According to Enterprise, from a certain way of looking at it, it was the Romulans, not the founding members, who created the Federation.

Well said. I don't understand why people that hate something spend so much time on forums talking about it. I can't help but wonder what poor quality of life people might have if they post so many negative posts devoted to something they don't like.
With respect, you may be misusing the term "Hate."

All the episodes and movies have pluses and minuses. in these forums it perfectly valid to wish to discuss negative aspects and express your viewpoint about them. Just as you can go from thread to thread regaling us all with your belief in the latest film unqualified perfection, anyone else can show up in those exact same threads with the viewpoint that that same movie had a certain number of demonstrable faults.

There are a small number of members to this board who's posts I simply don't read, even if they are commenting on one of my previous posting (especially not then), When "you know who" posts anything at all, just skip it.

Unless you somehow enjoy the blood pressure rush.

.
 
It might have been interesting to have seen the Romulans more in TOS, but then again the way it was explained somewhat precluded it. The Klingons were pretty free to roam almost anywhere at will and therefore could be encountered almost anywhere. Meanwhile the Romulans were not supposed to cross the Neutral Zone and to have run into them the Enterprise would have had to have been restricted more to a certain sector of space.
 
My imperfect theory is that instead of internal control (i.e. logic), the Romulans perfected a system of external control (i.e. dictatorship). Because if you look at intelligence units like the Tal Shiar, every citizen is wound up tight in that Empire. You can't step out of line.
And that's a very good start for an answer. Some Trek writer needs to get to work on fleshing that out.

Also, the Romulan Empire is (or was) a major galactic power. That power is based on conquering other civilizations and engaging in unprovoked assaults on other galactic powers like the Federation. Maybe the reason (or result of this) is to provide an "external outlet" for their people's aggressive tendencies.

That explains why the Rommies veer bizarrely between isolationism and aggression. Yet they seem sharp, savvy, intelligent people. There's something else going on there, and it would be nice if that something else tied neatly in with their backstory.

Temis the Vorta wrote:
It was longtime fanon, canonized in ENT, in a memorable conversation between T'Pol and Trip. Dunno if the writer was female - probably not - most of the writers on that show were guys and I didn't bother to notice who wrote what - but it hardly matters now. One way or the other, it's 100% pure, unadulerated FACT now.
And one of the elements I was hoping would get jettisoned by the nuMovie so we could get closer to TOS Sci-Fi instead of the human saga/space opera that later Trek became. TOS had more of a "Twilight Zone" template. Got more of the "Star Wars" template instead - and one of my many disappointments with nuTrek.
Dealing with flaws of Vulcans puts the spotlight on them and away from the humans (if that's what you mean when you say a human saga is a "bad thing.") And what does any of this have to do with Star Wars?

Temis the Vorta said:
There has definitely always been a blindly smug undercurrent of "aliens will eventually see the superiority of human ways" in Star Trek
I liked TOS better than later Trek because I think it has LESS of your, very correct, observation about human superiority. Vulcans were quite respected, admired - almost super-human in TOS. Spock is the one who had to condescend to admit that human ways did have some value. The beauty of the K/S/M trio was that their perspectives were equally valuable.
Yeah, TNG really amped up the Superior Human BS to an unbearable degree. But even in TOS, I got the sense that there was something off-kilter and dysfunctional about the Vulcans. The Vulcans don't have to be perfect just to counter the TNG tendency towards putting humans on a pedestal.
 
That explains why the Rommies veer bizarrely between isolationism and aggression. Yet they seem sharp, savvy, intelligent people. There's something else going on there, and it would be nice if that something else tied neatly in with their backstory.
I don’t know whether there’s any canon or semi-canon support for this, but I’m under the impression that they leave the rest of the galaxy alone when dealing with internal conflict, and when the praetor consolidates power over the whole empire they set their sights to external targets.
 
Well said. I don't understand why people that hate something spend so much time on forums talking about it. I can't help but wonder what poor quality of life people might have if they post so many negative posts devoted to something they don't like.
With respect, you may be misusing the term "Hate."

As far as a lot of what's said about this movie goes...no, he's got it dead-on.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top