It's quite clear that Spock is a coward. Just look at how he chickened out in TWOK. He's clearly not willing to lay his life on the line.
It's simple. You NEVER give a weapon of mass destruction into the hands of your enemy. NEVER.
It was already very stupid of Spock to take such a huge ball of red matter with him to begin with.
It's simple. You NEVER give a weapon of mass destruction into the hands of your enemy. NEVER.
It was already very stupid of Spock to take such a huge ball of red matter with him to begin with.
So you are saying Spock shouldn't have taken his huge balls of red matter with him? The purpose was to contain and stop the supernova. That's why he was on the mission.
Look Spock Prime in the eyes and call him a coward. Go on. I double-dog dare ya.
If there had been a way to prevent Nero from getting the Jellyfish, Spock Prime would've done it. Period. If anyone doesn't know that about Spock by now, then they've never watched Star Trek.
What do you folks calling him a coward need? Ten or fifteen minutes of exposition in the movie explaining how Spock Prime was captured? Geez. Use your imaginations. Why jump directly to "he's a coward?" That is, use your imagination for good, not to claim he's a coward because no scene actually shows him too disoriented to fight, unable to enact a self-destruct routine, or whatever. Geez.
For what it's worth, Spock Prime looked pretty damn shaken when he walked onto the Narada. I mean, his mission to save Romulus failed, he was almost killed himself, now he probably has little or no idea where he is. Bad day.
Look Spock Prime in the eyes and call him a coward. Go on. I double-dog dare ya.
If there had been a way to prevent Nero from getting the Jellyfish, Spock Prime would've done it. Period. If anyone doesn't know that about Spock by now, then they've never watched Star Trek.
What do you folks calling him a coward need? Ten or fifteen minutes of exposition in the movie explaining how Spock Prime was captured? Geez. Use your imaginations. Why jump directly to "he's a coward?" That is, use your imagination for good, not to claim he's a coward because no scene actually shows him too disoriented to fight, unable to enact a self-destruct routine, or whatever. Geez.
For what it's worth, Spock Prime looked pretty damn shaken when he walked onto the Narada. I mean, his mission to save Romulus failed, he was almost killed himself, now he probably has little or no idea where he is. Bad day.
He's not real, you know? There's no harm done to anyone if one calls a fictional character a coward or idiot.
And I posted the link to the few Nero #4 comic pages, where he isn't disoriented at all, just stupid.
No, no, no. That's where you're wrong. In the 79 episodes of TOS and the original six movies (not to mention TAS, TNG, and the novels) there is abundant evidence that Spock is stupid (he's not considered a genius even by vulcan standards, that's for sure) and that he is a coward that's not willing to put his life on the line for what he believes is right (I mean it's not like he ever nearly died or, you know, completely died for his comrades welfare). If the new Trek movie has taught me anything it's that Spock is a cowardly moron. That must be the secret to the popularity the character has enjoyed for over 40 years.And again, Spock is not stupid. My guess would be in character, every one of Spock's friends and colleagues would believe that if he could've stopped Nero in any way, he would've. Coward and stupid are strong words. Evidence of those charges should exist. It doesn't.
No, no, no. That's where you're wrong. In the 79 episodes of TOS and the original six movies (not to mention TAS, TNG, and the novels) there is abundant evidence that Spock is stupid (he's not considered a genius even by vulcan standards, that's for sure) and that he is a coward that's not willing to put his life on the line for what he believes is right (I mean it's not like he ever nearly died or, you know, completely died for his comrades welfare). If the new Trek movie has taught me anything it's that Spock is a cowardly moron. That must be the secret to the popularity the character has enjoyed for over 40 years.And again, Spock is not stupid. My guess would be in character, every one of Spock's friends and colleagues would believe that if he could've stopped Nero in any way, he would've. Coward and stupid are strong words. Evidence of those charges should exist. It doesn't.
It was already very stupid of Spock to take such a huge ball of red matter with him to begin with.
Spock is not a coward, he is an IDIOT.
As can be seen here:
http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/20/trekink-exclusive-preview-of-star-trek-nero-4/
No, no, no. That's where you're wrong. In the 79 episodes of TOS and the original six movies (not to mention TAS, TNG, and the novels) there is abundant evidence that Spock is stupid (he's not considered a genius even by vulcan standards, that's for sure) and that he is a coward that's not willing to put his life on the line for what he believes is right (I mean it's not like he ever nearly died or, you know, completely died for his comrades welfare). If the new Trek movie has taught me anything it's that Spock is a cowardly moron. That must be the secret to the popularity the character has enjoyed for over 40 years.And again, Spock is not stupid. My guess would be in character, every one of Spock's friends and colleagues would believe that if he could've stopped Nero in any way, he would've. Coward and stupid are strong words. Evidence of those charges should exist. It doesn't.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.