Spidy 3 vs Term 3

[RobertScorpio]

Okay..enough time has passed since these two movies came out. Which movie was the better movie?? Both, I think, were let downs, compared to the previous installments. But I think TERM-3 holds up better than Spidey-3. What say you all???

Rob
Scorpio

 

[Norrin Radd]

Terminator 3 was inferior to its predecessors, but miles better than the nigh-incomprehensible Spider-Man 3.

 

[RobertScorpio]

Terminator 3 was inferior to its predecessors, but miles better than the nigh-incomprehensible Spider-Man 3.

Yep, I see it that way too Mr. herald...

Rob

 

[Smiley]

I can't agree that T3 was a letdown. It was a five-star experience for me. It offers a different type of movie than the previous two films, but that does not make it inferior in my book. Spider-Man 3 gets three stars from me on a good day, so it should be clear which one I voted for.

 

[Ward Fowler]

They both sucked but if forced to pick I'd say T3 is the better movie.

 

[Stegoman05]

I like both of them. Even tho spidy 3 sucked compared to the other two i was still entertain. Same for terminator 3, i thought it was a fun and entertaining movie. In fact, i like it more than the first one. I always thought the first was kind of boring, still good, just boring. Between the two, terminator 3 gets my vote.

 

[Jax]

Close, erm not re-watched Spidy 3 unlike T-3 but am a bigger Spidy fan so Spidy wins.

 

[Davros]

T2 was so horrible that I never bothered to see T3.

 

[Jax]

T2 was so horrible

I must go back in time and kill you now

 

[Hermiod]

Spider-Man 3 was okay. It was just a disappointment after 2.

 

[Davros]

T2 was so horrible

I must go back in time and kill you now

Don't be mad at me because I'm right.
I am sure there are far better reasons.

 

[OdoWanKenobi]

Terminator 3 was just okay. Spider-man 3 was an unwatchable mess.

 

[Ethros]

T3

If you think Spider-Man 3 is better then as Arnie says in the movie "talk to the hand"

 

[Admiral2]

T3 vs Spidey3?

Can I write in Norbert?

 

[Admiral James Kirk]

I loved Terminator 3. It felt like a true sequel to the original whereas T2 was more of a Terminator meets Kindergarten Kop, feel-good sort of spin-off of the original Terminator.

I also loved Spider-Man 3. But I must point out that I think Spider-Man is a piece of shit and Spider-Man 2 merely really good rather than excellent. I think Spider-Man 3 cut through a lot of the shit I hated in the first two movies and went for the action and I respect it for it's lack of pretension.

Between T3 and SM3 I'd have to pick T3. It's a much more solid movie with a focused storyline and a great shocker ending.

 

[Mr Light]

Terminator 3 was a pretty good flick, I thought. Sure T2 was better but T3 managed to be a little different and had a great twist ending.

Spidey 3 I found to be the most enjoyable of the films only because it had the most action and villain count (I despise the teen soap opera garbage that dominates these movies!).

T3 is definitely the better of the two!

 

[Trent Roman]

I like both films, but have always thought Spider-Man 3 could and should have been so much more. T3, on the other hand, had clarity of purpose on it's side: blow shit up but good. And I love the ridiculously long chase scene.

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman

 

[The Borgified Corpse]

T3 was a disappointing rehash of the 1st 2 movies. (No one does car chases or killer robots better than James Cameron.) But it's somewhat saved by a good ending that opens the door for some potentially excellent sequels.

Spider-Man 3 was a giant clusterfuck that completely ruined one of the few decent, filmable storylines from the comic. Yet, somehow, it made enough money that they're paying Tobey Maguire $50 million to do it all again! ...twice!!

 

[nx1701g]

Terminator 3 for obvious reasons, though I'm not too sure based upon rumors I've been hearing if I'll share the opinion in relation to T4.

 

[Admiral James Kirk]

Yet, somehow, it made enough money that they're paying Tobey Maguire $50 million to do it all again! ...twice!!

What? They're paying that skinny little fuck 25 million dollars apiece for the next two Spidey movies? Jesus! He ain't worth it! They could easily replace him with Jake Gyllanal and not only would nobody not notice the acting would improve. Of course I think they should also replace Sam Raimi because all three Spider-Man movies are bloated overlong messes and could use a director who knows to cut the crap and get on with the show.