Ah, then Trek's "canon rules" are every bit as messed up as Wars' after all! Shame that.
I don't see what's so messed up about it, or how Trek and Wars are unique in this regard. Tie-in material for any franchise needs to stay consistent with the official canon. With ST and SW that means the TV series and movies. Is there any series that does it differently?
Ah, then Trek's "canon rules" are every bit as messed up as Wars' after all! Shame that.
I don't see what's so messed up about it, or how Trek and Wars are unique in this regard. Tie-in material for any franchise needs to stay consistent with the official canon. With ST and SW that means the TV series and movies. Is there any series that does it differently?
Well, until very recently, SW had a multi-tier canon system, with the movies on top, but the books were considered canonical, to a certain extent. Now, of course, they have been declared non-canonical, but future novels will be supposedly be as canonical as the movies - so yeah, it's a bit messed up.
The only character from TOS where im curious about is captain Sulu.
Is he still alive and captain of the Excelsior?
That are the big questions... maybe a little bit exaggerated.![]()
I have to read 3 star trek books(the buried age, Forged in Fire and The Sundered), before I start with One Constant Star wich time set is 2319.
If the books have to follow the films then that supernova is practically the end of the line isn't it? Timeline's erased and you can't have further stories set in it?
You talk like this is some sort of draconian commandment limiting creativity. It's not, it's just the reality tie-in materials have to deal with.Had thought Trek was a bit more relaxed on this sort of stuff but now I'm not so sure.
Ah, then Trek's "canon rules" are every bit as messed up as Wars' after all! Shame that.
I don't see what's so messed up about it, or how Trek and Wars are unique in this regard. Tie-in material for any franchise needs to stay consistent with the official canon. With ST and SW that means the TV series and movies. Is there any series that does it differently?
Well, until very recently, SW had a multi-tier canon system, with the movies on top, but the books were considered canonical, to a certain extent. Now, of course, they have been declared non-canonical, but future novels will be supposedly be as canonical as the movies - so yeah, it's a bit messed up.
My understanding is STO, including the STO tie in novel, was a separate timeline from the main Trek lit.
As was the Crucible trilogy and the Shatner novels.
I don't see what's so messed up about it, or how Trek and Wars are unique in this regard. Tie-in material for any franchise needs to stay consistent with the official canon. With ST and SW that means the TV series and movies. Is there any series that does it differently?
Well, until very recently, SW had a multi-tier canon system, with the movies on top, but the books were considered canonical, to a certain extent. Now, of course, they have been declared non-canonical, but future novels will be supposedly be as canonical as the movies - so yeah, it's a bit messed up.
That "multi-tiered canon" stuff was crap. While George Lucas borrowed what he wanted to from the EU, in the end the movies were the only thing he counted, and some fans will argue he didn't even stay too consistent with them. Though, I thought Disney wasn't even going to consider future novels canon, that from now on Star Wars canon is just the movies plus Clone Wars and Rebels.
I'd love to someday get a novel about Spock's loss in the Prime universe. The authors of Vulcan's Forge/Heart/Soul would be a good choice. Focus on Saavik and the surviving TOS crew, with Picard and TNG characters as supporting characters. There should be a lot to follow up on with the fallout from the destruction of Romulus and what becomes of the surviving Romulans.
My understanding is STO, including the STO tie in novel, was a separate timeline from the main Trek lit.
As was the Crucible trilogy and the Shatner novels.
Yeah, but don't forget that they're basically different franchises from each other because they have different ways of describing species, physics, etc. You can't say that they're all different quantum realities within the same multiverse unless you want to throw the entire concept of consistency out the window.My understanding is STO, including the STO tie in novel, was a separate timeline from the main Trek lit.
As was the Crucible trilogy and the Shatner novels.
If the books have to follow the films then that supernova is practically the end of the line isn't it? Timeline's erased and you can't have further stories set in it?
Had thought Trek was a bit more relaxed on this sort of stuff but now I'm not so sure.
I'd love to someday get a novel about Spock's loss in the Prime universe. The authors of Vulcan's Forge/Heart/Soul would be a good choice. Focus on Saavik and the surviving TOS crew, with Picard and TNG characters as supporting characters. There should be a lot to follow up on with the fallout from the destruction of Romulus and what becomes of the surviving Romulans.
OK, got that misapprehension pretty much solved except for one last thing:
Is there any requirement for the books to have to align with the Countdown comic?
On the one hand, some of the moves there - like Ambassador Picard - could work, on the other hand I'm finding Data more interesting outside of Starfleet.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.