If they have to destroy Romulus, I hope at least they do not use the countdown comics but just what was on screen and create their own back story.
If they have to destroy Romulus, I hope at least they do not use the countdown comics but just what was on screen and create their own back story.
The novelverse is pretty well displaced from where the Countdown comics had the universe - Data has come back, but not through B-4, and he's not in Starfleet, Picard is still in command of the Enterprise and married to Doctor Crusher, Worf hasn't left Starfleet for the Klingon Defense Fleet... There's pretty much no way that the Countdown comics and the novelverse can be reconciled to be set in the same universe at this point, until 2486 drastically changes things, which I doubt.
It's about time TrekLit got a bit more daring.
Given everything the TrekLit authors have done the last 13 years or so -- plenty of daring stuff -- I can't help but think that sentence is a bit insulting.
"2486"?If they have to destroy Romulus, I hope at least they do not use the countdown comics but just what was on screen and create their own back story.
The novelverse is pretty well displaced from where the Countdown comics had the universe - Data has come back, but not through B-4, and he's not in Starfleet, Picard is still in command of the Enterprise and married to Doctor Crusher, Worf hasn't left Starfleet for the Klingon Defense Fleet... There's pretty much no way that the Countdown comics and the novelverse can be reconciled to be set in the same universe at this point, until 2486 drastically changes things, which I doubt.
"2486"?
As Trek books are not, in the official sense, "canon" - don't really want to make the thread go boom - why not take advantage of both that and Trek's multiverse nature and not reflect it at all?!
As Trek books are not, in the official sense, "canon" - don't really want to make the thread go boom - why not take advantage of both that and Trek's multiverse nature and not reflect it at all?!
Books may not be canon, but they have to adhere to the films and shows which are.
They do not actually have to chronicle these events in a novel, and really I hope they don't. Simply because there are other things I want to read about. Although, I have to admit, the aftermath is certainly ripe ground to cover, particularly what the loss of Romulus will mean for the Typhon Pact.
Exactly, and since the Official Word from Paramount is that the older Spock played by Nimoy comes from the universe that was depicted in all previous Trek shows and movies (which we now call the "Prime Universe") than any Trek noel set after 2387 has to have Romulus destroyed and Spock mysteriously disappeared.
They do not actually have to chronicle these events in a novel, and really I hope they don't. Simply because there are other things I want to read about. Although, I have to admit, the aftermath is certainly ripe ground to cover, particularly what the loss of Romulus will mean for the Typhon Pact.
No it doesn't. That's just what happened from the view of spock and nero.
Well I don't really want to go into it any more then that because then it skates close to story ideas. :/
I really hope they don't try to weasel out of the destruction of Romulus. It already feels like death is a temporary condition in the Trek universe.
I really hope they don't try to weasel out of the destruction of Romulus. It already feels like death is a temporary condition in the Trek universe.
I'm not fussed. ST11 was rubbish so I'm not particularly worried if everything from it is ignored, sidestepped or rolled straight over.
I don't think it makes much sense to ignore a film that was very popular.
I don't think it makes much sense to ignore a film that was very popular.
wasn't very star trek though
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.