• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News SpaceX heavy-lift vehicles: Launch Thread

disposal.png


"We were disappointed that the rocket didn't make a THOOOONK noise when it went into the tube, but we're setting up big loudspeakers for future launches to add the sound effect."
 
Its very spacious and should make for a comfortable stay.

I feel a little unnerved by a tall thin thing being used as a lunar lander, when they dont have a stable surface to land on.

IM's Odysseus toppled over not so long ago, and going back further, Apollo 15's LEM landed at a 11° angle. Luckily the LEM was a squat little thing, and there were no significant issues.
 
Last edited:
Next launch in about 14 minutes. Has a very special payload on board
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Next launch in about 14 minutes. Has a very special payload on board
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Not the payload we want onboard though for a one way trip.

Poor banana subjected to space travel. :) hope he's wearing his pyjamas
 
That’s Ben Gardner’s boat..Hooper is in for a shock..

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Near, far—wherever you [SLAP!]
 
A landing deluge?
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

At least Starship has a better TPS than Orion…right? (cough)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Maybe an interior deluge too…
 
Last edited:
The latest Starship failure—that occurred 22 years to the day after STS-107
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Oh well—we have truth in advertising:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

An alternative
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

It would be nice if we had a Moon Rocket where all the stages worked:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
Never quite seen the point of landing the boosters vertically. Are they too big/awkward/not structurally sound when empty to parachute back to earth like NASA did with the Shuttle SRBs. Parachutes aren't light but surely lighter than the fuel and landing struts (and less chance for boom if something goes wrong).
The engines' electronics, pipework and nozzles would likely not take kindly to impact with the ocean and subsequent corrosion by seawater, even if they had cooled enough to withstand the thermal shock. The fuel tank integrity might similarly be compromised. The SRBs were a lot less complex, but they required considerable refurbishment after recovery.


My understanding is that the SLS SRBs are not going to be recovered and refurbished. They weren't for the Artemis I test flight. The cost saving for the STS SRBs was always marginal and the SLS SRBs are about 25% more massive as they have five instead of four segments each.

SpaceX's Mechazilla tower grab method has worked successfully twice now, with one abortive ditch into the Gulf of Mexico/America in between. Whatever one thinks of Musk, it does appear his engineers do know what they are doing.
 
Interesting times…Stoke just got a $200 million investment…my favorite NewSpace company.

Scuttlebutt about an even larger rocketship:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Then too—I hope to see SLS go from OldSpace fuddy-duddy to the rocket of the resistance :)

 
Last edited:
Heh.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Get out of the way, NewSpace brats:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top