News SpaceX heavy-lift vehicles: Launch Thread

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by XCV330, Jan 24, 2018.

  1. Non Sync

    Non Sync Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Hiding from the NARA, I've said too much...
    It blew up.

    Other engineering translations:
    Percussive maintenance = I hit it and it started working
    Cycle power to the panel = Turn it off and on again
    High impedance air-gap = I forgot to plug it in
    Organic grounding = I got electrocuted
     
    Gingerbread Demon likes this.
  2. Gingerbread Demon

    Gingerbread Demon I love Star Trek Discovery Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Location:
    The Other Realms
    Ha!!! I love it .

    Kinetic disassembly hehe nice
     
  3. diankra

    diankra Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    Tom Paris will start it.
     
  4. StarCruiser

    StarCruiser Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Location:
    Houston, we have a problem...
    Looked to me like one engine flamed out at ~T+1:40...

    I don't think it ever came back and that's what doomed the landing. Not enough thrust from only 2 engines.
     
  5. Gingerbread Demon

    Gingerbread Demon I love Star Trek Discovery Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Location:
    The Other Realms
    He'd probably steal it and store it in a replicator pattern or hide it on Voyager somewhere
     
  6. diankra

    diankra Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    Probably accurate to call it a success (or a successful failure, aka Apollo 13). It blew up on landing, but the data stream will allow them to avoid it next time. And it worked on 2 of the 3 tasks.
     
  7. Non Sync

    Non Sync Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Hiding from the NARA, I've said too much...
    I think they actually shutoff the engines intentionally. There was some gimbling of the engines right before the one engine shutoff around T+01:40, the second engine shutoff around T+03:13, with the final engine shutting off at T+04:41 just as they rolled over to horizontal glide.

    At T+06:31 the first engine restarted, with engines two and three both restarting at T+06:32. As the ship rotated back to vertical, the engine exhaust took on a green tint around T+06:38. It's hard to see, but it looks like engine two flamed out at T+06:39. At T+06:40, it is a strong green and black smoke is present in the exhaust and I cannot tell if the other engine is still running.
     
    XCV330 likes this.
  8. YellowSubmarine

    YellowSubmarine Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Told you it would get disassembled faster than that faulty Orion capsule.
     
  9. Gingerbread Demon

    Gingerbread Demon I love Star Trek Discovery Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Location:
    The Other Realms
    In a rather spectacular fashion too.
     
  10. Non Sync

    Non Sync Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Hiding from the NARA, I've said too much...
    Go big or go home!
     
  11. Non Sync

    Non Sync Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Hiding from the NARA, I've said too much...
    Elon Musk tweeted "fuel header tank pressure was low during landing burn, causing touchdown velocity to be high & RUD*, but we got all the data we needed."

    *Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly
     
    Gingerbread Demon likes this.
  12. publiusr

    publiusr Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
    It might be a good idea to put the nose mount descent engines for the Lunar Starship if not Buran Analog turbojets on the winged articles to preserve the airframes for even rougher tests

    Ship chart
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/image...6a13b14ee5b9df772d8bb4ead3e87fb6a48bddfeb.png

    Lunar landers compared
    https://forum.cosmoquest.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=25721&d=1607826724

    The old Roton
    https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=47798.0

    The closest to Starship the Soviets ever got
    http://www.astronautix.com/m/mtkva.html
    http://www.buran.ru/htm/str124.htm

    Starship sim
    https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=52455.0
    www.moonwards.com
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2020
  13. publiusr

    publiusr Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2020
  14. Gingerbread Demon

    Gingerbread Demon I love Star Trek Discovery Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Location:
    The Other Realms
  15. YellowSubmarine

    YellowSubmarine Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    SpaceX has officially jumped the shark. Er, I mean, the tower arm has jumped the giant explosive firemaker.
     
  16. Marc

    Marc Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2003
    Location:
    Shinning Waters
    yeah I can't see this working to well as describe with a very potential for RUD.

    I'm not sure how stable the Falcon 9 heavies are without legsl but a bet approach might be to land the rocket and quick swing the tower back in place which gives you a bit of lee way but are they okay to sit on the engine nozzles (or is there an assembly in place - look at some images but can't quite tell).
     
  17. publiusr

    publiusr Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2021
    StarCruiser likes this.
  18. XCV330

    XCV330 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2017
    Location:
    XCV330
    SN9 may make a launch attempt on the 13th or 14th. SN10 has its nosecone attached, now.
     
  19. publiusr

    publiusr Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
  20. XCV330

    XCV330 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2017
    Location:
    XCV330
    Do you have to do hyperlink diarrhea over every single goddamned thread? does it just bottle up inside?