• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Space Station Stuff

I agree that I don't agree either.

I browsed and immediately disagreed here: “It wasn’t until the space shuttle came along that it was possible to consider building a space station as a series of building blocks.”

Salyut was already moving in that direction and Mir was built as it was also because Proton was the biggest launch vehicle the Soviets had.

But America didn't have to do that. I think the United State's generous and unwanted gift of Skylab to the people of the Australian outback was one of the stupidest decisions made in space policy. It still bothers me, and I know i am not alone, that people wander through Skylab II at the NASM thinking it's some kind of mockup or display. Nope, that's unflown space hardware. That's America's second large space station, and it could have been launched on one of the Saturn V's people chose to abandon outside Marshall and Johnson instead of flying so they could concentrate politically on STS and Apollo-Soyuz.

Skylab should have been saved. Skylab II should have been flown. By the time we needed a Skylab III, Shuttle-C would have been a heavy-lift option for building the next one from the lessons learned from the previous two. And that's the sad part, those lessons had to wait decades. Skylab needed its orbit boosted, needed an increase in solar power capacity, as well as a docking module, but all those things would have been good lessons to learn anyway, and certainly were in the capacity for NASA once Shuttle was running . Of course Shuttle delays and an unexpectedly strong solar weather surge meant Skylab was coming down early, but I still maintain it could have been saved by sending up one of the remaining Apollo CM's and boosting it's orbit via the Service module, just enough to keep it up there a few more years.

By the time that ISS building began in orbit, with the shelving of the US Propulsion Module, NASA was at least unwilling to hedge those kinds of bets since it was now entirely reliant on the Russians and the occasional Shuttle reboost (not many of the latter, lately) and the ICM remains in mothball status just in case it is needed. So. one lesson learned at least.
 
There were plans to save Skylab, by launching a propulsion module on the shuttle and then docking it to Skylab, but delays to the shuttle ruled it out.
 
A new space robot has been developed to ease space station work
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-lightweight-space-robot-precise.html

---there's a need for a lightweight robotic arm that can manipulate in environments difficult for humans.
However, the control schemes that can move such arms on Earth, where the planes of operation are flat, do not translate to space, where the environment is unpredictable and changeable. To address this issue, researchers in Harbin Institute of Technology's School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation have developed a robotic arm weighing 9.23 kilograms—about the size of a one-year-old baby—capable of carrying almost a quarter of its own weight, with the ability to adjust its position and speed in real time based on its environment.


They published their results on Sept. 28 in Space: Science & Technology.
 
Crew Dragon got more flights on a single-source non-competitive contract. What this says about Boeing Starliner, well, that's discussable, I guess.
 
more Starliner oddness, now they are replacing the entire service module off the current ship before the OFT-2 flight in May.

https://scitechdaily.com/nasa-boein...ce-modules-ahead-of-mission-to-space-station/

“The team’s dedication to developing effective remedies and corrective action after our first OFT-2 launch attempt demonstrates their continued commitment to safely flying NASA crews for years to come.”

ie: We don't know what's wrong so we just replaced the entire service module before NASA cancels our entire contract.
 
At this rate they should be happy to launch anything before the ISS is deorbited in 2031...

NASA has already moved intended Starliner crew to Dragon, and while I can understand them wanting more than one craft to get crew up there, I am starting to wonder if Starliner should be it...
 
Hmm, maybe it is easier and faster to replace he module than to try and fix the one that's in place.
 
I think we need to keep the ISS running, there's no reason to get rid of it until we have a proper replacement in place IMO.
Axiom will take over much of the operations of the American side. Their first mission aboard will be this spring.

I suspect the Russian side will eventually be disconnected with the Russians either going it alone or more likely letting their segments splash. With the bulk of the international partner's work transferring to Gateway , it looks like Axiom/ISS will be primarily a commercial operation.
 
NASA is urging commercial partners to develop their own private space stations, and wants to shift its own attention to interplanetary endeavours, such as Gateway.

And the Russians may be able to use Nauka and Prichal after ISS is decommisioned, but the other modules are really showing their age. Zarya, the first module, will be 32 years old in 2030... I hope they can use Prichal at least, as that is a very pointless module at the moment.
 
Should the Russian and US segments separate? ISS can be boosted via Cygnus craft if really needed.

Is it time to splash ISS early? It's hard to imagine working any further with Russians.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top