• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sony Spider-Verse discussion thread

I'm not commenting on whether their opinion was correct or not, and I certainly don't agree with their decision. I'm merely addressing what the specific nature of their complaint was. I often see the reports interpreted as evidence that the story or the acting was bad, but from the actual quotes that were reported, it seems their concerns were with the production values instead. It might have been a perfectly good story, just not blockbusterish enough for the new WB regime that only wants gigantic tentpoles.

I just hope someday we get the chance to find out one way or the other.
Apologies, quoted the wrong post I think.
 
I second that, it's the first time I heard something like that.

I fail to see what’s so extraordinary or incredulous about something that you… one two three four?… clearly didn’t read in 2012 but was documented by the likes of SFX, Den of Geek, Hollywood reporter etc. and which was very much clearly pre-release jitters by execs who had greenlit and funded a very very big gamble.

Nor what’s so extraordinary about movie execs (famously always in touch, right?) and CEOs (such as the ever sane Ike Perlmutter (sp)) saying something batshit like “This isn’t cinematic enough, we’re going to lose millions here” in a thread where we’re talking (off topic ish too) about the rash of studios doing the exact same thing 12 years later.

It was reported around the time that the first full trailer came out. You’re all welcome to google it but you don’t have to pile on and [try to] fucking gaslight me for remembering something which passed you by.
 
Last edited:
It's like 'Batgirl' . There's nothing to suggest it would have been any better than the other terrible movies but because it will never be seen people will convince themselves they're being deprived of a masterpiece.
i don't think anyone was saying it was a masterpiece... but given the track record of the directors, and the amount of money spent, as well as actors involved (c'mon man, JK Simmons!) , as well as suspicions about David Zaslav's judgement/values... many of us think it would have been better than what Zaslav told stockholders. Certainly no worse than The Flash

I think the issue is that there was a change of management when the film was pretty well along in production. The previous regime wanted to make both big-budget features and smaller TV/streaming productions, with Batgirl being in the latter category, while the new regime was only interested in making huge-budget tentpoles. So the movie may have been good enough for what the original execs intended, but didn't live up to the new execs' standards. It's not uncommon for new bosses to kill their predecessors' projects.

Actually, i think a couple of changes??? The initial plan was for it to be on Max... as they are trying to pump that streaming service to compare with the other ones. But then some genius thought it would be better in the theater (i suspect someone not running Max). Then we get the merger with Discovery, where control has now changed.

And then we got David Zaslav, who many of us are seeing as a non-creative bean counter who is just trying to make a quick buck... he didn't have confidence that it would make a lot of money in the theaters....and can someone remind me of the timing of Batgirl's trashing to Zack Snyder's Justice League? I suspect that ZSJL did not justify the cost put into it (i.e. how many subscribed to see it and/or even viewed it in the first place), so Zaslav went the penny pnching route... completely oblivious to how the PR would spin out of control.

I don’t trust any exec who says a film isn’t cinematic enough. The Marvel/Disney execs said the same about The Avengers and were reportedly very worried about it before it was released. There were obviously incredibly wrong.

And also the directors were the guys who did Bad Boys for Life, which was the top grossing movie of 2020. OK, sure the pandemic lockdown started 2 months after the release.... but its numbers would have placed it in the top 10 in 2023 (the year after all the lockdowns were clearly removed). They had experience with a cinematic action success.... and at least for me, MS. Marvel showed what they could do (in a positive creative way) with TV-based filming.

The quality "had" to be promoted as bad to justify the tax-write off strategy.
 
I fail to see what’s so extraordinary or incredulous about something that you… one two three four?… clearly didn’t read in 2012 but was documented by the likes of SFX, Den of Geek, Hollywood reporter etc. and which was very much clearly pre-release jitters by execs who had greenlit and funded a very very big gamble.

It was reported around the time that the first full trailer came out. You’re all welcome to google it but you don’t have to pile on and [try to] fucking gaslight me for remembering something which passed you by.
First of all nobody can be bothered to read everything posted online, that's impossible.

Secondly, you keep using the word gaslighting, I don't think you what that means.
 
No one gaslighted you, they simply asked for a source on something you claimed.
And, I’ve given an explanation for why I won’t be providing one.
They’re free to believe or disbelieve what they want. But to ridicule by requests for evidence is suggesting by implication that I am making something up, which I’m not. That’s at the least gaslighting adjacent.
 
I've done a Google search about Disney execs supposedly claiming The Avengers wasn't cinematic and all I get are multiple results about Martin Scorsese's comments. I've also read the book MCU which goes into detail about many of the behind the scenes drama that went on with the MCU films and other Marvel productions (including the Sony Spiderverse movies) and it doesn't mention any such concerns being voiced about The Avengers either.
 
"You may have seen me in Anyone But You and Euphoria. You definitely didn't see me in Madame Web."

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I take back every bad thing I ever said about Sony.

JMDaZb9.png


https://www.google.com/search?q=venom+3+cast
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top