Cold. But, yeah, I don't get a sense of coherence from this show. So many things were going to be meaningful and were dropped. Unless they were just kewl things to make a moment. Black badges, water floating during black alert, and that weird antenna living planet come to mind.
I know people say other Trek shows took awhile to get their footing. But I think most people mean "to get good in my opinion." TOS was great out the gate and got a slight bit worse as it got routine. But the Genes knew what it was about.
You might dislike TNG 1-2, but it clearly was something. Most of us think it got better in 3, but there was def. a vision (new crew having adventures with new aliens, occasionally retelling old stories). My wife and I are rewatching DS9. It feels to me like the writers really had a coherent vision (since they were going in a very different direction). Most ppl like that show better in its later years, but it feels coherent at the start.
I am on the pro- side of DSC, but it's not an adventure-of-the-week; it's not a novel about an ambiguous guy trying to do good (b/c he turned out to be a mustache-twirler); it's very rarely about xenophobia, but only occasionally. I thought originally they were gonna sstand things on their head the way the Ferengi do, and make us see the Klingons' point about the Feds. It does seem like they have a show and an hour per week to fill, but not sure what to do with it? I do tune in to find out the answer to "this week's mystery." Maybe that's its vibe. You never know "what's really going on," or "what will happen next." Is DSC the new Lost or Prisioner?
I guess I am off-topic, but this muddled-ness with VoqAsh is probably a symptom of the confusion that seems to have been behind the scenes. I guess we'll get a good documentary or Making-of book someday.