• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

So What Are you Reading?: Generations

INTO THE MUMMY'S TOMB, edited by John Richard Stephens.

An anthology of vintage Mummy stories and articles by the likes of Louisa May Alcott, Tennessee Williams, Mark Twain, Ray Bradbury, H. P. Lovecraft, Arthur Conan Doyle, and others.
 
I'm reading a new Sherlock Holmes novel with Dr. Jeckyll and Mr Hyde by Christopher Claver. I really like the first novel with Dracula and the easter eggs about old monster horror movies in the book.
 
I'm not nearly to the climax of The Wounded Sky, but whenever I get to the point where K't'lk sings the new universe into existence (shades of Tolkien's Ainulindalë), the music I hear in my mind is the finale from Stravinsky's Firebird.

And I've probably said this a dozen times before.
 
This must be the first time I've read The Wounded Sky since DSC premiered: the Spore Drive seems a lot like the Inversion Drive.

Then again, the environment where the crew finds themselves when they travel to the core of the anomaly also manages to anticipate the Realm of the Prophets.
 
This must be the first time I've read The Wounded Sky since DSC premiered: the Spore Drive seems a lot like the Inversion Drive.

Spore drive always reminded me more of slipstream drive from Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda, in that it involved traveling along a network of threads in an alternate space and had no correlation between real-space distance and travel time.
 
Never had any contact with Andromeda, so I wouldn't know.

The similarities I see have to do with spore jumps being instantaneous, and being unsettling for the inexperienced. And on the previously unprecedented "black alert": the Enterprise went to red alert prior to any inversion jump.
 
Last edited:
Reading an ebook of short speculative fiction stories by our own Australis titled Unreliable Times. I’ve only read the 1st of the 4 but it looks to be a good follow up to his Catching Light which I really enjoyed, he’s quite talented.
 
I finished a reread of Star Trek: Wildfire by David Mack. It holds up quite well today, especially for someone so early in their Trek writing career. I appreciate that there was so much that was true to the ideals of Star Trek in this story, even amid so much death and destruction. That last chapter is still a gut punch.
 
Last night, I wanted something rather short, so I re-read a children's novella, Call Me Bandicoot, by William Pène du Bois. I'd first encountered it when it was first published (1970), and serialized in Children's Digest. (my mother had given me a year of it, even though I'd have been happier with Popular Science, and I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was actually worth reading, particularly for the serialized novella).

It's about a greedy, weasely kid who ekes out a living on the Staten Island Ferry, telling tall tales, and there's a twist ending to the general effect that he's not as greedy as other members of his family.

Pène du Bois had set out to write a series of books on the Seven Deadly Sins, but only got through four: Sloth (Lazy Tommy Pumpkinhead), "vanity" (pride? Pretty Pretty Peggy Moffitt), gluttony (Porko Von Popbutton), and "stinginess" (greed, the present opus). I can only imagine that he realized the nearly insurmountable challenge of writing a children's book about lust, when he abandoned the project.
 
Last edited:
Just started on re-reading The Rolling Stones. As in Heinlein, not as in Jagger or Wenner.

The Stones haven't left the Moon yet, but Roger Stone has just bought a new family spaceship.
 
"A Corruption in the Blood" by Ambrose Parry.

The third book in this series of medical mysteries set in 19th century Edinburgh. (We're up to 1850 in this book.)
 
Just started on re-reading The Rolling Stones. As in Heinlein, not as in Jagger or Wenner.

The Stones haven't left the Moon yet, but Roger Stone has just bought a new family spaceship.
Had to look this up to find out that this is the same novel I know as "Space Family Stone". Absolutely loved this book as a child and have continued to like it as an adult.
 
Had to look this up to find out that this is the same novel I know as "Space Family Stone".

In a 1969 edition, apparently. I wonder if that was an attempt to capitalize on the Space Family Robinson comics, and on Lost in Space, which would've been called Space Family Robinson if Gold Key hadn't beaten them to it.
 
It was serialized in Boys' Life under another alternate title (Tramp Space Ship), and I believe the UK publication was under one or the other alternate title.

The first time I'd read it, I'd already read Stranger in a Strange Land. This was much less challenging.
 
As I recall, this one used Michael Jan Friedman's crew for Picard's Stargazer from the novels, but doesn't quite get it right -- it gets Commander Gilaad ben Zoma's name wrong by calling him Commander Zoma, first name Ben, and makes him black instead of Israeli. Otherwise, I think I found it okay.




Not every title is about the most central thing in a story. For instance, "The City on the Edge of Forever" refers to the ruins containing the Guardian of Forever (which were meant to be a much bigger, more elaborate city rather than just a few Greco-Roman columns), even though that's only a catalyst for the main story. And "The Corbomite Maneuver" is just one scene out of the entire episode. Titles are often about attracting attention, using a hook to draw people into the story. The Stargazer title here seems to me like it's about establishing setting -- "Here's a story about events involving two different Stargazer crews in past and present."




I like Ryan North's work, but while this was an okay story with some clever ideas, I felt it rode too hard on continuity references, which are my least favorite part of LD. And not all of those references worked. Where did North get the idea that the space hippies from "The Way to Eden" were Catullan? Only Tongo Rad was Catullan; Dr. Sevrin was Tiburonian and his other followers were human. Also, why would the fashions, makeup, and slang of 23rd-century space hippies still be unchanged over 100 years later? That's not how counterculture works! That part was just a misfire on every level. (Although I loved the marginal joke about the space hippies: "Or, as we call them in space, regular hippies.")

Speaking of which, I initially borrowed this collection from Hoopla to read on my computer, but the panel zoom-in function caused me to miss the marginal jokes that are among the funniest parts of North's comics, and once I realized they were there, I found them hard to read on my screen. So I ended up requesting a print copy from the library instead. I strongly recommend reading this one in print, unless you have a better electronic comics reader than Hoopla provides and better vision than I have.

Yes, it can be done (with the current software, though it couldn't in the previous version), but it's a hassle to hit the "+" button over and over on every page until it's big enough (because it shrinks back when you turn the page) and then drag the page to the part you want. It's easier, faster, and more comfortable to read in print.
Do you have a phone or tablet you can read it on? Lately the majority of my comics reading has been through Hoopla on my tablet and it works great. You can set it for one page full screen, and it's in terms of size, clarity, and ease of use, it's not that far off from reading a physical comic.
 
Do you have a phone or tablet you can read it on? Lately the majority of my comics reading has been through Hoopla on my tablet and it works great. You can set it for one page full screen, and it's in terms of size, clarity, and ease of use, it's not that far off from reading a physical comic.

Why is this still being debated? I decided I'd rather read the print comic, so I got the print comic from the library. That was three weeks ago. Problem solved.

If anything, it would've been harder to read on a phone or tablet, since their screens are smaller than my desktop screen. I don't see the advantage.
 
Why is this still being debated? I decided I'd rather read the print comic, so I got the print comic from the library. That was three weeks ago. Problem solved.

If anything, it would've been harder to read on a phone or tablet, since their screens are smaller than my desktop screen. I don't see the advantage.
Is someone trying to be helpful in case a problem recurs a "debate"?

(I like reading comics on a tablet better than a computer screen because your tablet can easily be turned into portrait orientation, unlike your computer screen. My Kindle Fire's display is only marginally smaller than a physical comic.)
 
Is someone trying to be helpful in case a problem recurs a "debate"?

The point is, I already found the best solution: get it in print. As I explained before, I could have read it digitally if I'd had to, but since I didn't have to, I preferred to read it in print, because that's more comfortable and natural. Maybe, if I had a tablet equal to or greater in size than a print comic book page, I would find that a satisfactory equivalent, but I don't. And I'd still see it as a substitute for the real thing.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top