So far, do you think season 2 of Discovery is better than season 1?

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by The Overlord, Feb 9, 2019.

?

So far, do you think season 2 of Discovery is better than season 1?

  1. Yes

    62 vote(s)
    86.1%
  2. No

    10 vote(s)
    13.9%
  1. The Overlord

    The Overlord Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    So far, do you think season 2 of Discovery is better than season 1?
     
    Butters likes this.
  2. Cyrus

    Cyrus Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I think it is, and I liked season 1 too.
     
  3. MakeshiftPython

    MakeshiftPython Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Absolutely. I have not felt this enthusiastic about seeing a new Trek episode since the 90s. With a change in tone and with a stronger emphasis on exploration, it's really giving me that certain classic Trek vibe that I don't think really felt fresh since possibly TNG. I'm looking forward to seeing how they keep it up for the rest of the season.
     
    JoeP, Turtletrekker, KennyB and 3 others like this.
  4. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    Season 2 is good, but I prefer Season 1.
     
    SpocksOddSocks and Ovation like this.
  5. BillJ

    BillJ History’s Greatest Monster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    Covington, Ky. USA
    Not a fan of season one, but have been pleasantly surprised by the uptick in quality of season two. Hopefully they can maintain their momentum.
     
  6. Ovation

    Ovation Vice Admiral Admiral

    Subject to adjustment by the end of the season, but thus far, I feel the same.
     
  7. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Was this always a poll or did I just miss it the first time through?
     
  8. Hythlodeus

    Hythlodeus Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    not really. season 1 was fantastic. season 2 so far had two outstanding episodes back to back with Point of Light and Obol for Charon, but it also had New Eden which was the worst callback to 90s Trek possible. Season 1 never went as low as New Eden
     
  9. JirinPanthosa

    JirinPanthosa Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Absolutely. It has the positives of season 1 without (So far) its major problems.
     
    Butters likes this.
  10. PiotrB

    PiotrB Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2018
    I like both seasons the the same. The second season simply has to be a bit different because there is no war in it any more. What does not change the fact that there is no return to the past and it is still a modern heavily serialized series. Supporters of series without a leading theme whose episodes can be watched in a random order will still be disappointed.
     
    JoeP, DaveyNY and Vger23 like this.
  11. Vger23

    Vger23 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    New England
    They are both very different, which is why I appreciate them.

    Star Trek has always appealed to me because the same show can do "Doomsday Machine," "City on the Edge," and "Balance of Terror" right along side "Trouble with Tribbles, "I, Mudd" and "Piece of the Action"

    I hate when Trek gets too homogeneous and every episode is basically the same tone, structure and theme. It's another contributing element to what drove the ennui of Trek in the late 90's. That, along with the ever irritating need to have a "Klingon Story," a "Ferengi Story" a "Q Story" etc every season

    I liked S1 a bit more, but S2 has way more potential. S1 was based on a premise that, in theory, I hated...but it rose above that in my eyes, and I ended up loving it in spite of that bias. On the other hand, S2 is like a dream premise (kind of like Indiana Jones in space...galloping across the galaxy getting in adventures while trying to solve a larger puzzle), but thus far has not quite lived up to it.

    Time will tell.
     
  12. Jadeb

    Jadeb Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2017
    Based on what little we've seen so far, the writers seem much more adept at the semi-episodic format than they were at sustaining season 1's more serialized approach. Last season we raced from shocking twist to shocking twist, intercut with absolute filler like the Pahvo episode and L'Rell standing around in her cell. The show made no time for Stamets to grieve Culber's death, but the writers found time for Tilly to get high with Clint Howard and for Eeevil Georgiou to have a completely inconsequential three way. That boggles me, though I'm willing to chalk some of the problems up to the troubled behind-the-scenes stuff.

    This year has been much more satisfying so far.
     
    lawman, Michael and MakeshiftPython like this.
  13. Terok Nor

    Terok Nor Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Location:
    Rigel VII
    Yes, but Discovery will likely always be my least favourite Trek due to the fact it's all about Burnham, a character I can't stand played by a terrible actress. There are some parts of the show I enjoy but not enough to overlook Burnham/Sonequa.
     
  14. BillJ

    BillJ History’s Greatest Monster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    Covington, Ky. USA
    Which simply isn't true. I enjoy episodic far more than serialized, but if it is entertaining, it is entertaining.
     
    Terok Nor likes this.
  15. Vger23

    Vger23 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    New England
    Agree with you wholeheartedly. Bias and "tastes," combined with Real Star Trek(tm) expectations shape reactions, no matter what people believe about their purity and unbiased nature.

    It doesn't invalidate those felings, but it does lay waste to their rationalizing approach that something they don't like is objectively bad.
     
    JoeP, fireproof78 and PiotrB like this.
  16. Michael

    Michael In alignment with canon Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Location:
    Aloha Quadrant
    For me it's like night and day. Some of the problems of season one are still present, but from what we've seen so far of season two the writer's seem to have a much better grasp of the tone, pacing and theme of the show. Which is a complicated way of saying: I'm enjoying it more. Hopefully there's still room for improvement, though.
     
    lawman, BillJ, Jadeb and 1 other person like this.
  17. Kane_Steel

    Kane_Steel Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Season One was utter trash. Show was elevated by Jason Issacs' compelling performance, but then they ruined his character anti-climatically.

    Season Two has 3 good episodes and 1 terrible one thus far. It's definitely off to a better start.

    Season Two is also better by default because of the addition of:
    [​IMG]
    The writing also seems to be taking more cues from classic Trek and Berman-era Trek.

    Speck will likely make or break this season, but I'm looking forward to the episodes beyond 2.05, when Harberts and Berg are fired. :)

    Those two are definitely responsible for some of the more divisive elements of STD S1, and deserved the axe.
     
  18. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    Same here. I enjoy both, and see no harm in preferring one over the other.
     
    JoeP and DaveyNY like this.
  19. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Spock
     
    JoeP, Campe98, Vger23 and 1 other person like this.
  20. Vger23

    Vger23 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    New England
    The "Season 1 vs. Season 2" rhetoric has gotten almost as annoying as the "Orville vs. Discovery" debate.

    People love to draw battle lines. "You're either with us, or your with the terrorists!!!"
     
    JoeP, donners22, PiotrB and 2 others like this.