• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

SNW truly respects TOS continuity!

Star Trek Beyond felt like Star Trek, unlike the previous two films, and I'm glad to hear MA was useful to Simon Pegg. I wish he was writing the next one.
 
My point is that when the owners change and the new owners show a clear lack of interest in following the previous canon, what they add is clearly not the same canon as what came before. To add to canon you need to pay attention to what came before or you are literally making mistakes and continuity errors. In 2005 CBS came into the picture and they have imposed changes that are obviously based on business and not creative decisions.
If there is anyone who demonstrated a clear lack of Cannon when they took over the franchise it was Rick Berman and Brannon Braga. I'm like the people who were running the franchise today, they were not fans and never even watched TOS until very late in their stewardship of the franchise. ( and in fact were encouraged to not ever watched TOS by Gene Roddenberry himself.)
 
Star Trek Beyond felt like Star Trek, unlike the previous two films, and I'm glad to hear MA was useful to Simon Pegg. I wish he was writing the next one.
Great.

Canon is not about feel. Otherwise, well, people know how I feel about TMP and TWOK.
 
If canon were about me liking something dozens of episodes and perhaps two films would be wiped from the canon. Thankfully I don't make that decision, the studio does. As they should.
 
Yup, I strongly dislike about 75% of Voyager not to mention all the TNG movies and season 4 of Enterprise. That dislike doesn’t make those entries not canon.
 
Yup, I strongly dislike about 75% of Voyager not to mention all the TNG movies and season 4 of Enterprise. That dislike doesn’t make those entries not canon.
Even Roddenberry didn't have that power really. He declared TAS non-canon and said as much about Star Trek 5 to the point TAS isn't in the 1990s Trek Encyclopedia and his opinion of 5's apocryphal status is mentioned. But now that he's gone, TAS and 5 are fully on Trek's official website database as canon.
 
Even Roddenberry didn't have that power really. He declared TAS non-canon and said as much about Star Trek 5 to the point TAS isn't in the 1990s Trek Encyclopedia and his opinion of 5's apocryphal status is mentioned. But now that he's gone, TAS and 5 are fully on Trek's official website database as canon.

Exactly. Canon is a decision by those who are in charge. Now Alex Kurtzman runs the show. He’s decided that anything onscreen, live action or animated is canon. But I feel like we’re just going in circles at this point.
 
Exactly. Canon is a decision by those who are in charge. Now Alex Kurtzman runs the show. He’s decided that anything onscreen, live action or animated is canon. But I feel like we’re just going in circles at this point.
Sorry I'm going to have to point out that I think Kurtzman's stance is that any words seen on screen or dialogue is canon. Because obviously with Robert April or Kyle... Basically, since no dialogue or words were ever mentioned about their race, that's open to change, whatever was onscreen aside.
 
Sorry I'm going to have to point out that I think Kurtzman's stance is that any words seen on screen or dialogue is canon. Because obviously with Robert April or Kyle... Basically, since no dialogue or words were ever mentioned about their race, that's open to change, whatever was onscreen aside.
Cool.

Sounds about like art.
 
"The Menagerie" makes so little sense that not even light can escape...

We just watched that the other night, because my wife had no memory of it, and I wanted her to understand all the Pike stuff from SNW.

It is really….weird.
 
Sorry I'm going to have to point out that I think Kurtzman's stance is that any words seen on screen or dialogue is canon. Because obviously with Robert April or Kyle... Basically, since no dialogue or words were ever mentioned about their race, that's open to change, whatever was onscreen aside.

We don’t know if it’s the same Kyle. There’s more than one family in the world named Kyle. My level of care on the discrepancy of April’s skin color is so low it’s not even funny.
 
We just watched that the other night, because my wife had no memory of it, and I wanted her to understand all the Pike stuff from SNW.

It is really….weird.
Cobbled together so they could use the original pilot to get ahead on the production schedule, IIRC. The framing device doesn't stand up to close scrutiny.
 
Canon should be put to the vote, that should solve everything? I mean future canon in future series as you can’t re-write Trek history of course even if the damage has already been done on screen, though TPTB can probably get away with multiversing canon when the need arises or use a bit of creative ‘temporal sidetracking’ via various anomalies, maybe even Temporal Cold War related. There are probably too few people who make decisions on the important plot points like this when it should go with a larger majority vote with an overwhelming consensus. Small or debatable majorities cause arguments and fragmentation amongst the fanbase, it would definitely have to be an overwhelming majority vote to warrant a major change or controversial plot point that a writer might come up with. It’s a bit like the debate around Peter Cushing Doctor Who and *real* Doctor Who isn’t it really! :D
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top