They show a decline in viewership of NuTrek shows, countering the narrative that these are popular shows, which is an argument used to counter criticisms of narrative issues, plot holes, canon violations, inconsistencies, ETC. (Which is the root of discussion:
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/snw-truly-respects-tos-continuity.311582/page-2#post-14177062)
What are you talking about?
These are two
examples of my original data source (Numeris) that I use to compile this overview:
I chose these two examples to show that these are broadcast viewership numbers, that include CTV Sci-Fi, and not the "Crave" numbers. What is so hard to understand about that? Read the thread, not just one post.
Yes, I do have a list, because I compiled that list from Numeris data.
No, they don't. I did that. I compiled that list from Numeris data.
And no, it's not a lot of work.
People here seem to have an obscure notion that is a hugely time-consuming task. It's not.
It's not hard to go to a website, download a PDF and write down a number in a text file.
Ok, so now I'm also accused of fabricating data. LOL!
It's the wrong data!
It's incomplete data!
It's irrelevant data!
It's fabricated data!
LOL!
Any more accusations? You people are throwing the kitchen sink at me, just to avoid acknowledging that these shows are not hits and waning in popularity.
My source for these numbers is Numeris.
https://numeris.ca/
I go to the website, download the PDF with the weekly overview, and write down the viewership number in a text file.