• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Should they bring back Janeway?

Bring back Janeway?

  • Bring her back

    Votes: 151 57.2%
  • Keep her dead

    Votes: 113 42.8%

  • Total voters
    264
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
But I swear, if after 8 more Voyager books Janeway hasn't reappeared yet in some capacity I'll make up a "bring Janeway back" interpretive dance, perform it in my underwear, and post it on Youtube, just for you.

This is by far the most inspired notion I've read through what is it...three years now?...of this conversation.

Thrawn, you just elicited a nerd laugh of awesomeness from me, and after the week I've had, I wouldn't have believed that was possible.

Thanks.

And for those interested in continuing this debate, feel free, but no confirmation of if/when/how Janeway will or will not return to Voyager lit or teases about the 2011 novel will be forthcoming any time soon. As we've all learned by now, too much discussion of such contentious matters before a story even comes out is pretty much a waste of everybody's time.

Best,
Kirsten
 
Well, like I said above, I think there's a difference and a death can be well-done. Captain America's, for example, which led to Bucky becoming Cap. And Batman's death has led to Dick taking up the cowl - apparently for at least another two years (and it's been, what, one so far?).

Yes, and those are good stories. But if you KNOW the previous character is returning and the status quo is pretty much going to be reset...then all that kinda was for nothing.

It takes something that should be profound and turns it into a gimmick.

HE'S DEAD! WOE! Oh, wait, not really, everyone can come back now.

That's just cheap.

Well, even in those two particular examples, we know Steve Rogers and Bruce Wayne are coming back. Steve's already back in fact. But for Bucky and Dick, it's likely and possible (respectively) that they'll actually get to continue in these new roles.

Well, there's ways to bring somebody back without doing an actual reset. Looking at comics, there's a difference between a Green Lantern: Rebirth and a Flash: Rebirth. And the return of Colossus was handled very well, IMO (although I hear they've done little useful with him sense Whedon went off the book). And Bucky Barnes/Winter Soldier might be the best example there is of a character going from "sacrosanct cannot-be-resurrected" to "well-done resurrection."

But even if the individual stories are well-done, they're still symptoms of an unfortunate syndrome in the comics industry as a whole. Nothing is moving forward anymore. Every story these days is about nostalgia and returning to the status quo that the creators grew up with. Comics are trapped in a loop, enslaved to their own past.

Forgive me for carefully going through this, but this avenue of conversation seems more interesting than more "I want Janeway back" wailing. ;) And perhaps it can even loop back to Star Trek somehow.

When was the last time a major new superhero came along and became a success?

Do legacies count as "new" superheroes? If they do, then I'll offer Courtney Whitmore (Stargirl), Jakeem Thunder, and especially Michael Holt (Mr. Terrific) from DC that pop to mind fairly easily.

When was the last time an established character got to go through any real growth rather than just the illusion of change that got reset a few years later? Even good changes that were made in years past, like Peter Parker growing up and getting married, have been cast aside in favor of nostalgia.

Well, Bucky Barnes would be one of the best examples I think. And Cyclops' ascension to control of the X-Men I think would qualify.

Over at DC, it's too soon to tell about Dick as Batman I'd say. Barbara Gordon is a famous one, though I suppose that happened quite a while back by this point. I'd say some of the legacy characters, especially on the JSA, have gotten some real growth (Stargirl, Jakeem, Hourman, Jesse Quick/Liberty Belle, for example). Sinestro on the villains' side for sure.

The only new ideas we get are gimmicks like turning the Green Lantern Corps into the Care Bears, with lots of multicolored promotional rings and t-shirts. And even that storyline involved bringing back a lot of dead characters -- including characters who were killed solely so that they could be brought back as zombies and then resurrected at the end. (And sure, they say that now death is permanent in the DC Universe again, but how long is that going to stick? And will it bring about any other kinds of real, lasting change, in a creative climate that's so obsessed with reliving past glories?)

That's a bit of a harsh characterization of the various Corps, I think. I mean, it can be gimmicky, but it's also a massive expansion of a pretty long-time mythos in the DCU.

I'll believe that DC death is permanent when I see it. :lol: I'm sure some folks will stay dead, and I hope they stay dead. We'll see if they really stick to it.
 
If we stay with the comics (specifically Superman) analogies - if Before Dishonor is "The Death of Janeway", and Full Circle / Unworthy are "World without a Janeway", does this mean we're due for a "Reign of the Janeways" storyline running through all Trek Lit series? :lol:

I bet that would satisfy the Janeway fans - not just one Janeway, but FOUR :techman:!
 
Next Generation gets considerable more books than Voyager.

VOY's ratings were miniscule compared to the ratings juggernaut that was TNG in first-run syndication.


I bet that would satisfy the Janeway fans - not just one Janeway, but FOUR :techman:!
Bun-of-steel Janeway
Borg Queen Janeway
Resurrected Elizabeth Janeway, complete with French-Canadian accent
Militant Janeway.

In a battle to the (again) death!
 
i'd love to see Janeway come back only to get killed off again in a completely random and meaningless fashion like, tripping over a brick or something.
 
Watch out for Myriad Universes: The MultiDeath of Janeway, coming 2012! Featuring such classics as "transporter malfunction", "bizarre kitchen utensils accident" and "explosive decompression in the event horizon of a black hole".
 
Our characters are used to fill out other ships or as cannon fodder. It's not fair, it's not right.

My favorite series is DS9. Right now, aboard the station as a member of the crew, DS9 does not feature Sisko, Jake, O'Brien, Keiko, Odo, Worf, Rom, or Garak - Garak, my favorite Trek character ever. Nor does it feature the first Dax, who is dead, or the second Dax, who is captain of another ship entirely.

My second favorite series is TNG. Right now, aboard the ship as a member of the crew, TNG does not feature Data, Riker, Troi, or Ro (not a regular, but definitely a favorite). Data is dead. Riker and Troi are on another ship. So is Ro.

Please explain to me the lack of parity and fairness?

This point was made during the previous go-round. Repeatedly. And ignored by the Church of the Living Janeway every time.

The thing is, most of us here are Star Trek fans, who like multiple series. We like the universe. We like learning more about it. And those of us who mainly like one or two series still seem to like most of the regulars in those series. The Church of the Living Janeway seems to be people who really aren't fans of the Star Trek universe except for stories prominently featuring Kathryn Janeway as captain of Voyager. They see things differently from many of us. It would still be interesting to see them at least try to engage with this point about the DS9 and TNG novels, though.

Watch out for Myriad Universes: The MultiDeath of Janeway, coming 2012! Featuring such classics as "transporter malfunction", "bizarre kitchen utensils accident" and "explosive decompression in the event horizon of a black hole".

Every story featuring a variation on the line "Oh my God! They killed Janeway! You bastards!"
 
BTW, while the Janeway fans continue to voice their dissatisfaction over her death...
I've wondered at times if the vehemence of the Church of the Living Janeway (wonderful phrase there, Steve) is due largely to the utter trainwreck that was Before Dishonor in handling Janeway's demise.

Conceptually, Janeway's demise in the book made sense. There was a dark irony that Janeway, who had spent much of the past decade battling the Borg, would be turned into the very thing she had fought against and lose her life because of it.

That should have been dynamite. That should have been satisfying.

But PAD and Margaret didn't pull it off. The book was too long, the book was sloppy, the book was over-the-top, the book veered wildly in tone. If PAD had tightened up the manuscript, if Margaret had bled pens on it, if the book had come in at about two-thirds its length, Before Dishonor would have been a stronger book. And Janeway's death might have benefited as a result.
 
I bet that would satisfy the Janeway fans - not just one Janeway, but FOUR :techman:!
Bun-of-steel Janeway
Borg Queen Janeway
Resurrected Elizabeth Janeway, complete with French-Canadian accent
Militant Janeway.

In a battle to the (again) death!

Militant Janeway?
I understand the other three, but...

--

Bring her back, then kill her again. I read Before Dishonor, I'm halfway through, and I say she needs a Shatnerverse-ish return. The Borg thing was terrible concept. Like Kirk in ST7. But killed again.

I'm a Janewayite, but she and Seven were practically THE show (that is, Voyager) during Season 5 to 7. Besides, in a universe where she's dead, the other characters can have their own stories. (Haven't read Unworthy, btw, so I don't know if it's successful that way so far. I can't find it)

Plus, they can turn Chakotay emo! *shot* (/me JetCer)
Or the successful captain of Voyager, exploring the Delta Quadrant in honor of Ca- Adm. Janeway. IDK. If I don't like what TPTB/PB makes, I got to fanfiction. Ignore what I don't like. Like Voyager's Season 7. Easy as that. After all, the PB-verse and fanon are almost equal. Difference: You'll need to pay to get to the PB-verse. You'll suffer eye problems to get to the fanon verse (I know I did).

But I like two concepts mentioned here: Her adventures with Q, or Chakotay's spirit guide. She'd still be there; she's not necessarily 'dead', nor 'alive.' Hm...
 
Our characters are used to fill out other ships or as cannon fodder. It's not fair, it's not right.

My favorite series is DS9. Right now, aboard the station as a member of the crew, DS9 does not feature Sisko, Jake, O'Brien, Keiko, Odo, Worf, Rom, or Garak - Garak, my favorite Trek character ever. Nor does it feature the first Dax, who is dead, or the second Dax, who is captain of another ship entirely.

My second favorite series is TNG. Right now, aboard the ship as a member of the crew, TNG does not feature Data, Riker, Troi, or Ro (not a regular, but definitely a favorite). Data is dead. Riker and Troi are on another ship. So is Ro.

My third favorite series is VOY. Right now, aboard the ship as a member of the crew, VOY does not feature Janeway, Tuvok, or Neelix. Janeway is dead. Tuvok is on another ship. On the other hand, it has added Barclay, a recurring character, to the regulars.

Please explain to me the lack of parity and fairness?


Based on your post, it obviously isn't about parity. It's about writing books that are of interest to the majority of Star Trek fans. It's about selling more books to new fans who come to the fandom the way most of us do--through the TV series and the movies. This nuTrek might just spark interest in reruns or older movies, creating new fans who want to read about what they have seen in the programs--and what they have seen is long gone in the current novels.

Your post clearly highlights what for most of us "disenchanted fans" believe makes the current direction of the Pocket Books relaunch so uninteresting (there is a whole thread on the direction of the relaunch elsewhere on this forum that is quite critical of it). What this absence of known and loved characters has done is more or less made it impossible for the casual fan/reader who enjoys one of the TV series (or remembers it fondly) to pick up a book and start or resume their Star Trek reading habits. The relaunch has gone so far astray from the onscreen canon that it requires someone to read many MANY books to come up to speed--even if the writers and editors argue otherwise. Of course, they argue that. They are heavily invested in the continuation of the story line, so they continue the "myth" that each novel stands alone when it is obvious that each novel doesn't.

This hue and cry about exploring the "reality of death" for Janeway comes from posters who probably have an investment in direction of the relaunch has headed (and, methinks, novels they want to hawk that continue to follow the Relaunch story line) or who are such Pocket Book loyalists that they are afraid to look at this fwhole issue rom the point of view of a less-biased reader who just wants books about the people and the series they love. Since when does scifi in general, and Star Trek in particular, have to be true-to-life? Not only is this escapist reading at its best--or should be--it has a long tradition of approaching issues from the side or inside out or indirectly--are we giving that up? I personally think that Janeway's return from the Continuun (or wherever Q deposited her) could be quite interesting. Here's a thought--how do we handle the return of a beloved captain from the dead? Oooooo. :techman:

The bottom line is what matters to Pocket Books--or it's what should matter to them. They are in the business of selling books and should be conscious of what those potential readers want. They need more readers, new readers, because the people here are going to buy anything that has "Star Trek" on the cover are already on board. New readers come from the small and big screen--sad but true. Failing to write for them is to doom the whole Relaunch to oblivion IMHO.

To have half the voters here want Janeway to return is a significant number on a board that is 1) not Janeway friendly and 2) made up of Pocket Book fanboys, for the most part.

I guess some of us might say, "Oh, nooooooooooooo. The 'bash Janeway' bunch is back!" ;)
 
The bottom line is what matters to Pocket Books--or it's what should matter to them. They are in the business of selling books and should be conscious of what those potential readers want. They need more readers, new readers...

The new editor of Star Trek fiction at Pocket had nothing to do with the old decisions. I hope you've written your letters to Jamie requesting that your heroine be returned to her former greatness.
 
Our characters are used to fill out other ships or as cannon fodder. It's not fair, it's not right.

My favorite series is DS9. Right now, aboard the station as a member of the crew, DS9 does not feature Sisko, Jake, O'Brien, Keiko, Odo, Worf, Rom, or Garak - Garak, my favorite Trek character ever. Nor does it feature the first Dax, who is dead, or the second Dax, who is captain of another ship entirely.

My second favorite series is TNG. Right now, aboard the ship as a member of the crew, TNG does not feature Data, Riker, Troi, or Ro (not a regular, but definitely a favorite). Data is dead. Riker and Troi are on another ship. So is Ro.

My third favorite series is VOY. Right now, aboard the ship as a member of the crew, VOY does not feature Janeway, Tuvok, or Neelix. Janeway is dead. Tuvok is on another ship. On the other hand, it has added Barclay, a recurring character, to the regulars.

Please explain to me the lack of parity and fairness?


Based on your post, it obviously isn't about parity. It's about writing books that are of interest to the majority of Star Trek fans. It's about selling more books to new fans who come to the fandom the way most of us do--through the TV series and the movies. This nuTrek might just spark interest in reruns or older movies, creating new fans who want to read about what they have seen in the programs--and what they have seen is long gone in the current novels.

Your post clearly highlights what for most of us "disenchanted fans" believe makes the current direction of the Pocket Books relaunch so uninteresting (there is a whole thread on the direction of the relaunch elsewhere on this forum that is quite critical of it). What this absence of known and loved characters has done is more or less made it impossible for the casual fan/reader who enjoys one of the TV series (or remembers it fondly) to pick up a book and start or resume their Star Trek reading habits. The relaunch has gone so far astray from the onscreen canon that it requires someone to read many MANY books to come up to speed--even if the writers and editors argue otherwise. Of course, they argue that. They are heavily invested in the continuation of the story line, so they continue the "myth" that each novel stands alone when it is obvious that each novel doesn't.

This hue and cry about exploring the "reality of death" for Janeway comes from posters who probably have an investment in direction of the relaunch has headed (and, methinks, novels they want to hawk that continue to follow the Relaunch story line) or who are such Pocket Book loyalists that they are afraid to look at this fwhole issue rom the point of view of a less-biased reader who just wants books about the people and the series they love. Since when does scifi in general, and Star Trek in particular, have to be true-to-life? Not only is this escapist reading at its best--or should be--it has a long tradition of approaching issues from the side or inside out or indirectly--are we giving that up? I personally think that Janeway's return from the Continuun (or wherever Q deposited her) could be quite interesting. Here's a thought--how do we handle the return of a beloved captain from the dead? Oooooo. :techman:

The bottom line is what matters to Pocket Books--or it's what should matter to them. They are in the business of selling books and should be conscious of what those potential readers want. They need more readers, new readers, because the people here are going to buy anything that has "Star Trek" on the cover are already on board. New readers come from the small and big screen--sad but true. Failing to write for them is to doom the whole Relaunch to oblivion IMHO.

To have half the voters here want Janeway to return is a significant number on a board that is 1) not Janeway friendly and 2) made up of Pocket Book fanboys, for the most part.

I guess some of us might say, "Oh, nooooooooooooo. The 'bash Janeway' bunch is back!" ;)

I think you have a point in having the book line cater to new readers, but not at the expense of the "old" readers who wish to move forward.

I posted that queston before and couildn't get a viable answer - why can't PB publish novels set in the TV series era in addition to "Relaunch" novels?

There are two points, however, on which I respectfully (and completely) disagree with you:

1. The board - On what do you base your claims that the board is populated by "Janeway bashers/haters" or Pocket Book fanboys? Most of the discussion on Trek *literature* board revolves around Pocket Books products as they hold the license... Other fiction can be found on the *Fan* Fiction board.

2. Stand alone novels - yes, "Relaunch" novels build upon continuity set in earlier novels, but other than novels clearly marked "volume 2" etc, where have you seen Trek novels which new readers can't read as their first?
Even the "Destiny Aftermath" novels were quite easy to understand - even the VOY novels, which built upon not only Destiny, but on the previous VOY-R novels as well (Golden's 2 duologies).
 
This hue and cry about exploring the "reality of death" for Janeway comes from posters who probably have an investment in direction of the relaunch has headed (and, methinks, novels they want to hawk that continue to follow the Relaunch story line) or who are such Pocket Book loyalists that they are afraid to look at this whole issue from the point of view of a less-biased reader who just wants books about the people and the series they love.

OR from people who enjoy the direction of the novels and want it to continue as such, and have no ulterior motives whatsoever... WOW! Whodathunkit?!
 
Not to mention that many of the Janeway fans claiming to have blackballed Kirsten Beyer's novels weren't buying Pocket's VOY novels for years. Forgive me if I'm misremembering, but weren't some of them proudly praising their own free fanfic instead, a source of VOY stories which gave them total control over what they did to the VOY crew.

If Janeway was to return from the dead in the official tie-in novels, I really doubt that Brit and friends would suddenly take a renewed interest in commercial VOY novels.

That's what I remember as well, people who flat out stated they didn't like the books, didn't read the books, and more importantly, didn't buy the books ranting about how they weren't ever going to buy the books until She came back.
 
Leave her dead. If you're going to have the guts to kill off a major character, then have the guts to leave them that way.
 
Not to mention that many of the Janeway fans claiming to have blackballed Kirsten Beyer's novels weren't buying Pocket's VOY novels for years. Forgive me if I'm misremembering, but weren't some of them proudly praising their own free fanfic instead, a source of VOY stories which gave them total control over what they did to the VOY crew.

If Janeway was to return from the dead in the official tie-in novels, I really doubt that Brit and friends would suddenly take a renewed interest in commercial VOY novels.

That's what I remember as well, people who flat out stated they didn't like the books, didn't read the books, and more importantly, didn't buy the books ranting about how they weren't ever going to buy the books until She came back.

You have misremembered I have been a reader of Trek novels for years and years (I actually own the very first Trek novel, purchased when it was brand new on the rack) I watched and loved all the series up to Enterprise, which I didn't enjoy

I even own (and have read) the hard back edition of "Death in Winter." I've never counted but I probably own and have read a great number of Trek Books I also read a lot of other books, have read and loved Science Fiction since probably around 1958 when I was eleven. I have favorite authors that I read regularly. I think Harlan Ellison is probably a big Ass but I will read anything he writes pretty much.

And I write fan fiction. I do not however post on fan fiction.net nor do many of the really good fic writers, and guys there are some very good ones out there. Trek fan fiction has a history of attracting even professional writers beginning with Claire Gabriel, way back in the seventies when fan fiction was mimeographed and mailed.

Your fine tradition of Trek Literature started with people like Jacqueline Lichtenberg and those early TOS fanzines. Many of today’s novelists started out writing Trek Fan Fiction, Jacqueline created her Sime/Gen universe, and there are many more professional writers that started the same way. You really should respect your roots.

I do think if you go and look at the actual threads in question, you will find we were told to go back and read our own fan fiction and to leave the “real fans” alone, as if fan fiction was some dirty little secret someone should be ashamed of.

My daughter and I purchased, supported, and read Trek literature through the Voyager series including the “Spirit Walk” series and “String Theory”, we read the DS9 relaunch until the “Worlds of DS9” turned us off with the treatment of the Trill. We read the “Titan” series and even “New Frontier” and we read NG until “Before Dishonor.”

Already this month I have purchased four books including “The Needs of the Many” based on Star Trek online which includes a living Janeway. You see you don’t even have to write stories about her but she has to be alive and there has to be the possibility that someday a story will include her. This is not an unreasonable goal, and we are not changing what you want to read, we just want her alive.

So I am no longer purchasing Trek Novels that includes the dead Janeway story line. I have no desire to read that and it’s not reasonable to expect me to purchase and support a story line that is IMHO not only depressing fiction but bad fiction. It is also not reasonable to expect me not to protest her death and not to voice my opinion. I will however support any novel that does bring her back, also not unreasonable.

It’s pretty easy to make fun of others you don’t know, it’s easy to discount them, and it’s easy to forget that there are real people behind keyboards on the other sides of your monitors.

Our characters are used to fill out other ships or as cannon fodder. It's not fair, it's not right.

My favorite series is DS9. Right now, aboard the station as a member of the crew, DS9 does not feature Sisko, Jake, O'Brien, Keiko, Odo, Worf, Rom, or Garak - Garak, my favorite Trek character ever. Nor does it feature the first Dax, who is dead, or the second Dax, who is captain of another ship entirely.

My second favorite series is TNG. Right now, aboard the ship as a member of the crew, TNG does not feature Data, Riker, Troi, or Ro (not a regular, but definitely a favorite). Data is dead. Riker and Troi are on another ship. So is Ro.

Please explain to me the lack of parity and fairness?

This point was made during the previous go-round. Repeatedly. And ignored by the Church of the Living Janeway every time.

And repeatedly we have told you that with the exception of Data and Jadzia (my favorite trek character by the way), you have a reasonable expectation of reading about each of these characters even in a different line. There are Riker and Troi stories on Titan, and Ro is on DS9.

Data is a special case, based on a human actor portraying an ageless character and the inability of the actor to play the role within the stated parameters and the technology available in 2002. This was, in hind sight, a bad decision based on the advancement of technology first seen in “Beowulf” and progressing to “Avatar.” The death of Dax was a bad decision on the part of Terry Farrell, and exasperated by the treatment of the Trill in “Worlds of DS9.” The difference is the decision to kill Data was Brent Spiner, the decision to kill Jadzia was Terry Farrell. Not the decision of a Pocket Books editor, or even a producer or a writer.

The Church of the Living Janeway seems to be people who really aren't fans of the Star Trek universe except for stories prominently featuring Kathryn Janeway as captain of Voyager. They see things differently from many of us. It would still be interesting to see them at least try to engage with this point about the DS9 and TNG novels, though.

Problem is every time we try to engage in a reasonable conversation, we get shouted down by the “True Believers in the Second Coming of THE SISKO.”

There are however a number of Voyager fans that are in fact Voyager fans only, but that should in no way exclude them somehow as readers of Trek Books because their interests don't include NG or DS9. As far as I can tell Trek was always about inclusion not exclusion.

Brit
 
Leave her dead. If you're going to have the guts to kill off a major character, then have the guts to leave them that way.

Why don't you go tell that one to William Shatner? It doesn't take guts to kill a major character, it only takes lack of imagination and to try to cover that lack with sensationalism.

Brit
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top