If a war storyline develops naturally from the events in the series over multiple seasons, then sure.
War is all action and battles and glory and honour and sacrifice--which has been done in Trek and loads of other TV shows.
I think the next series should be set after a war, where the focus is on rebuilding planets, ships, relationships; dealing with the fallout of conflict, the devastated aggressor having to accept help from their adversary for help, the tensions that causes between and among both sides.
Its not the big flashy NuTrek-esque style, but the hard work, dedictation and resiliency of the characters that drive storylines and plot, making it a series of substance.
War is all action and battles and glory and honour and sacrifice--which has been done in Trek and loads of other TV shows.
I think the next series should be set after a war, where the focus is on rebuilding planets, ships, relationships; dealing with the fallout of conflict, the devastated aggressor having to accept help from their adversary for help, the tensions that causes between and among both sides.
Its not the big flashy NuTrek-esque style, but the hard work, dedictation and resiliency of the characters that drive storylines and plot, making it a series of substance.
I agree. Add everything Bry said to my initial post and that's my series.
War is all action and battles and glory and honour and sacrifice--which has been done in Trek and loads of other TV shows.
I think the next series should be set after a war, where the focus is on rebuilding planets, ships, relationships; dealing with the fallout of conflict, the devastated aggressor having to accept help from their adversary for help, the tensions that causes between and among both sides.
Its not the big flashy NuTrek-esque style, but the hard work, dedictation and resiliency of the characters that drive storylines and plot, making it a series of substance.
I agree. Add everything Bry said to my initial post and that's my series.
Yawn.
Are we always going to be hearing the same old whine about the Abramsverse all of the time? Or, are we going to accept the fact that this had to happen, and CBS/Paramount had to do this?
Yup. I paid good money to watch it, so I want to make sure it was worth it--by voicing my dismay at NuTrek.Yawn.
Are we always going to be hearing the same old whine about the Abramsverse all of the time? Or, are we going to accept the fact that this had to happen, and CBS/Paramount had to do this?
Yup. I paid good money to watch it, so I want to make sure it was worth it--by voicing my dismay at NuTrek.
NEVER!Yup. I paid good money to watch it, so I want to make sure it was worth it--by voicing my dismay at NuTrek.
It has been five years. At what point is it time to let go?
Are we always going to be hearing the same old whine about the Abramsverse all of the time?
If they can't tell me a story that's worth watching and that has a beginning, a middle and and end in an hour or so then I'm not going to invest week after week in the damned thing.
I think you can have a well-written series in a serialized format just as you can have a well-written series in an episodic format. For me the format is secondary. I just want well-written imaginative stories.
OldTrek is dead and gone.
Or maybe you mean "oldTrek is dead and gone"
as far as a new TV show is concerned. lol
"Star Wars" fans have much to worry about ....
OldTrek is dead and gone.
I could not respectfully disagree more.
I'll make this quick so as to not stray to far off from the OP.
Conventions, now, command and get face-value $1000 tickets.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.