So it isn't that I don't like the refit, it is more that it doesn't inspire the same level of OCD that I've had for some other subjects. From a model building perspective, this version helps fill in the gaps (much like the Phase II Enterprise) in the transition from the TOS Enterprise to the final refit.This sentence makes no sense to me. But you're you, so... Ok.
No, I wasn't contacted by Eaglemoss for their Phase II Enterprise... though they sure seemed to have used a lot of my research and analysis (including my cleanup and arrangement of Jefferies plans).@Shaw, I have a question you can feel free to ignore: Did you work any with Eaglemoss on their Phase II-version of the Enterprise?
And that was really the goal of all my work, so I'm happy with the end result.
Yeah, I'd seen some nice models made from that kit.UGH models had a nice one, before the C&D
Too much red striping for my tastes, but very interesting!So this is what that old South Bend toy was trying to look like... talk about roads not taken!![]()
The 11' model of the TOS Enterprise now sitting in the Smithsonian famously was never shot from the port side because that's where they hid all the wiring. The 8' refit Enterprise miniature built for Star Trek: The Motion Picture was sort of the opposite--we hardly ever saw the starboard side of that ship for the longest time, and that partly was because its motion control armature was connected on that side, right where you see that large panel that doesn't quite fit correctly. (We didn't see the starboard side of the refit Enterprise at all in TMP; it wasn't seen until the escape scene in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, when the Enterprise started crawling away from the mortally-wounded Reliant.)That one slightly inset panel next to the engineering hull's docking bay - is that supposed to be that sliding picture window out onto Earth/drydock that Harold Michelson wanted so bad for the cargo bay set? If so, impressive (even by this model's sky-high standards) attention to detail!
In all honesty, this is what I've come to expect from Eaglemoss. They also just went along and used Mark Rademaker's model of the XCV Enterprise as an actual prop in Into Darkness. That sorted itself out in the end but it was kind of a fuck up you would not expect from a company like that...Is it odd that they didn't contact me? A little. I made most of my info freely available, so I guess they didn't need to. But even the Smithsonian's restoration team reached out to me on the 11 foot Enterprise (though I had nothing to offer they didn't already have), so you'd think Eaglemoss might have contacted me
I think this looks spectacular, Shaw!So I had really hope to get much further along, but this is where she is at right now...
In the end, you kinda have to be philosophical about it. I research and document the works of some great artists to share their works with others. I am not one of the artists, so my part shouldn't over shadow their talents. Eaglemoss did a good presentation of the work of Jefferies, Price and Loos, and now a lot more people know of their work. And that was really the goal of all my work, so I'm happy with the end result.
Lots!I'm not sure how much interest there is in this,
Awesome. Thank you!but I figured I would share some of my additional research on the Hand Lasers.
Can you definitively say which hero prop appeared in which of the post-pilot TOS episodes? I assume that we are talking about "The Man Trap" and "What Are Little Girls Made of?" and no other episodes (besides the archival footage of "The Cage" in parts 1 and 2 of "The Menagerie")? Also, were the props modified in any way for use in the post-pilot episodes?The last thing of interest is that the two background Hand Lasers are not seen again after "The Cage". All additional appearances of the Hand Lasers in the series are of the two hero versions.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.