Okay, fine... I put everything back up.
And for the fun of it, here are some pics of my 33 inch Enterprise...

Picture 1

Picture 2

Picture 3

Picture 4

Picture 5
I'm sure you guys might be interested in my history of the 33 inch Enterprise, which is also back up (
here). And maybe some of my thoughts on the model, so here are questions that have popped up that I've been looking into.
Questions about the windows...
It looks like the windows have faded in areas that may have been
cleaned, and someone has attempted to fix this with what looks like pieces of black graphic tape (and reflective tape in a couple spots). Some of the faded windows can still be seen.
Questions about the decals...
Some are in good shape, but the ones on the top of the primary hull appear damaged (again, possibly from attempts at
cleaning). There are a ton of good sources for the original decals (the Smithsonian might even have a copy of one of the original sheets), but here is a comparison with my model's decals.

Decal comparison
Questions about the length...
Why is this thing being called
32 inches? Honestly, I'm not sure what the motive is here. The problem is that it can't be
32 inches, or even mistaken for that length. My model (if we consider it a good representation) is 33.75 inches, the actual model (with droopy nacelles) should be closer to 34 inches. The thing is, we get a good image of the model with the tape measure, and it is
not 32 inches.

Model length study
Questions about the stand...
The known history... Once the 33 inch model was modified to match the details of the 11 foot model, Roddenberry requested that the model be given a stand for displaying it. Datin noted that he modified the model in December 1966 using a microphone stand. This, to my understanding, was a piece of pre-existing equipment he had laying around. This consisted of the wood base, the gooseneck arm and a plug piece for a mic to attach to. The plug piece (which screwed onto the arm) was embedded into the secondary hull body of the model. (Note: I embedded the top part of a quick-release adapter into my replica, though all the parts are still of a mid-60s vintage.)
Why are there wires on the bottom and voltage notes if the model was unlit? Both are from the stand's previous use before being pressed into service displaying the Enterprise model.
Does the business card look authentic? It would help to have one of Datin's cards from that period, but I do have an image of a flyer that Datin put out in the early 60s and the typeface and phone number match.

Display stand study
And here is a shot of my vintage gooseneck arm for my model...

Display arm for replica
So one of the things that has been bothering me is the rear nacelle intercooler (there is only one remaining). Why is it there and why is it backwards?
That part is backwards on my model because I based it on how the original model looked in December 1968. Here is a quick comparison with the original model's current state...

Rear nacelle comparison
But that part shouldn't be there... it was lost in the early 70s. Here is the history of that part of the model...

Rear nacelle configuration study
It isn't like it could
grow back, and why put one of the other ones there and backwards? That is the type of thing someone who knows the model would do to make sure it was identified as the original model. That plus calling it
32 inches makes me a bit worried about who is putting the model out into the public at this time. They want to
seem like they don't know what they have, but also want to make sure that people can identify it for what it is.