I like mixing history with sci fi.
It has worked, and it can work some more. On TV would be nice. Any sci fi show that doesn't star a cop/sherrif/FBI agent would be nice. Desperation is setting in...

Avatar happens in a relatively distant future. Long-term manned missions to Alpha Cen, consciousness swapping, and superhuman-bodies-made-to-order are not exactly twenty seconds from now.
I didn't think Avatar was all that far off into the future. Some obvious technological innovations, but the culture was essentially the same as the present, right down to dress. Even with the lack of social vision of most sci-fi, this was very close to modernity. With breakthroughs providing the shift in location and materiel, I'd say a century, a century-and-a-half into the future; two hundred years at most.
Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
There are many books in this vein. I like Conrad's "The Cross Time Engineer" series. There are no bad settings in my opinion, just bad stories.
I'm currently reading through Poul Anderson's Time Patrol series, which uses the premise of a time-travelling organization that travels through history to protect it from alteration by irresponsible or malicious time travellers, but that's basically just an excuse for Anderson to indulge in his love of history and folklore and explore various ancient cultures in detail.
Enterprise did this once with the episode Carbon Creek. I certainly enjoyed it. If done well, I think it could make for a great story
There's a popular series of alternate history novels by Eric Flint, starting with 1632, which details an entire modern West Virginia town being transported back in time to Germany in 1632, and the ramifications (both social and technological) that occur afterward. There was also another series of books with a similar premise by S.M. Stirling, about the island of Nantucket being transported back to the Bronze Age. So that particular genre isn't exactly dead.
I loved Poul Anderson's The High Crusade, which mixes sci-fi with the time of the crusades when aliens attack. It's a classic to me.
I agree. WorldWar really dragged at times. I haven't read the Great War series yet...I thought "Guns of the South" was better that "WorldWar", though.
I agree. WorldWar really dragged at times. I haven't read the Great War series yet...I thought "Guns of the South" was better that "WorldWar", though.
[Re: "Carbon Creek"] Favorite Enterprise ep. Check handle.![]()
[Re: "Carbon Creek"] Favorite Enterprise ep. Check handle.![]()
I hate to break it to you, but the character in "Carbon Creek" was Mestral -- named in honor of George de Mestral, the real-life inventor of Velcro. Mistral means something else altogether.
I agree. WorldWar really dragged at times. I haven't read the Great War series yet...I thought "Guns of the South" was better that "WorldWar", though.
Okay...if you thought "Worldwar" dragged, then Great War realllllllllllllyyyyyy draggggggggssssss.
There were some neat notions in it, but if I were you, I would read "How Few Remain" and then stop and read the Wiki summary.
I liked The Great War, but the follow-up series, American Empire, definitely dragged. I couldn't get through the first book of his alternate World War II because AE had left such a bad taste in my mouth.Okay...if you thought "Worldwar" dragged, then Great War realllllllllllllyyyyyy draggggggggssssss.I agree. WorldWar really dragged at times. I haven't read the Great War series yet...I thought "Guns of the South" was better that "WorldWar", though.
There were some neat notions in it, but if I were you, I would read "How Few Remain" and then stop and read the Wiki summary.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.