Berman and Braga were millennials before millennials.It's probably BERMAN AND BRAGA's fault!!!1!
I also hate the fact that Geordi is the helmsman. How he goes from being the helmsman directly to chief engineer is beyond me
Klingon Warrior serves in the most warriorish job on the ship. He controls the weapons and always wants to shoot things. He's also the head bouncer when it comes to unruly passengers. Oh...and he likes to growl.How is Worf's position "traditionally and stereotypically" Klingon when he is the only Klingon to have ever served in Starfleet? LOL
To be fair, I think Worf actually created that image with Klingons. They use to no be Viking warriors until they started going with that aproach with Worf.Klingon Warrior serves in the most warriorish job on the ship. He controls the weapons and always wants to shoot things. He's also the head bouncer when it comes to unruly passengers. Oh...and he likes to growl.
I kind of liked it myself. I think I like it because even if honor is a big deal with them, many of them are not honorable people. You got plenty of hypocrites from Duras to Gowron.I think it's been said, but I hated the whole "honor" thing that TNG started with the Klingons. They had been conniving backstabbers whose word meant nothing. It's the Romulans that had been "honorable"...to a point. At least they had rules that they'd followed. The total reversal bugged me.
I agree -- that episode is ground breaking. Season 2 definitely had some gems, but sadly they were flanked by some absolutely terrible episodes.Also, 'The Measure of a Man' can be compared to anything, it's still amazing.
No, it makes no sense for a captain to have his pet beagle join them on an away mission, bounding up and down in the grasses of a completely alien world. WTH? And Archer's "let's go out and explore" gleeful attitude, instead of being a bit more restrained and military in persona.
TNG was lucky to have changed course in Season 2. If they hadn't it would have died as well. The "new Trek" fervor would've worn off, leading the show into cancellation. Season 3 rescued it. Ratings spiked quite a lot from there.
- Fall 1987 - Spring 1988: 8.55 Million
- Fall 1988 - Spring 1989: 9.14 Million
- Fall 1989 - Spring 1990: 9.77 Million
- Fall 1990 - Spring 1991: 10.58 Million
- Fall 1991 - Spring 1992: 11.50 Million
- Fall 1992 - Spring 1993: 10.83 Million
- Fall 1993 - Spring 1994: 9.78 Million
- Fall 1994 - Spring 1995: 7.05 Million
- Fall 1995 - Spring 1996: 6.42 Million
- Fall 1996 - Spring 1997: 5.03 Million
- Fall 1997 - Spring 1998: 4.53 Million
- Fall 1998 - Spring 1999: 4.00 Million
Season 3 did not bring in better ratings. While season 3 and 4 had begun to receive more positive reviews, Viewership continued its decline. Not that Viewership should be used as an indicator of quality anyway. Even the very best Trek could never hope to compete with a popular reality show, wrestling, or sitcom.I agree -- that episode is ground breaking. Season 2 definitely had some gems, but sadly they were flanked by some absolutely terrible episodes.
I get the premise of the 1st season having a certain grit to it... and because they were trying to find the "groove" or formula to work into the episodic process, there was experimentation. There's a little bit of fun in that. But after watching the best Season 2 episodes and taking a gander of Season 1, I'm not drawn in at all. In fact, I find it unsettling knowing how things play out later.
I just wish ENT had taken all this to heart. It took them a full 3 seasons to figure out things. No, it makes no sense for a captain to have his pet beagle join them on an away mission, bounding up and down in the grasses of a completely alien world. WTH? And Archer's "let's go out and explore" gleeful attitude, instead of being a bit more restrained and military in persona. He did get that later, having been "battle hardened." But unfortunately with the tenuous nature of the whole Star Trek TV series franchise at that time (Voyager was failing), ENT didn't have the luxury of doing this in a halfhearted way. The fans didn't appreciate it. Many fell off just as things were getting interesting. The Xindi arc was compelling, IMHO. But it was too late. That show died an early death. TNG was lucky to have changed course in Season 2. If they hadn't it would have died as well. The "new Trek" fervor would've worn off, leading the show into cancellation. Season 3 rescued it. Ratings spiked quite a lot from there.
I get what you're saying and I appreciate it. I didn't mean it had to be all lock-down military. BUT... Archer is the Captain of a Starfleet vessel. It IS military. There is military rank structure. It's Lieutenant Tucker, not Engineer Tucker. I'd just expect a certain level of military protocol and caution. You don't bring a pet along with you in an away mission to frolic around a field like it's the neighborhood park. Who knows what pathogen or parasite the dog could pick up, let alone be gobbled up by some alien animal. And if lost... then the crew is risking their safety aimlessly combing around looking for it. The "Let's go see what's out there, guys" thing would be fine for amateur or civilian adventurers, but not for this crew. It doesn't mean they can't have some innocent wonder during their adventure, but I just found the first 2 seasons of ENT having too much of that. It got better into Season 3. This was shaping up to be a great series... but they killed it. Because fans weren't supporting it. Not much different from Stargate SGU. That was a phenomenal series that was too radical a departure from the humoresque Colonel Jack O'Neill sarcasm and formulaic episodes of SG-1. I liked it... but it ran its course. Unfortunately SG-1 fans wanted more and were really let down by SGU, and abandoned it so that it ended up cancelled after just barely clearing 2 seasons. VERY sad. At least ENT had 4, but it was also such a disappointment to end before its time.These two things were great, and makes perfect sense. Archer, and his father, are from a world where military conflict is an alien (literally) concept, Earth had pootled around a few friendly star systems within the Vulcanian protective sphere, but that's it. You could say that mankind was naive (certainly the Vulcans thought so), but the "lets see what's out there" attitude is what I like to see from my Trek. We did the war thing - 5 years of DS9 with the dominion, culminating with a WW2 allergy, with very little exploring, of space. Plenty exploring the human condition, and how far the perfect humans of the 24th century would go when pushed. A couple of seasons of actual strange new worlds was really good.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.