Been too busy to get back to watching it since we kicked Scott Frost to the curb. Seems like we're rebuilding... but you know how many times I've gone through that spiel since Frank Solich was fired?I take it you haven't watched recently?![]()
Been too busy to get back to watching it since we kicked Scott Frost to the curb. Seems like we're rebuilding... but you know how many times I've gone through that spiel since Frank Solich was fired?I take it you haven't watched recently?![]()
Been too busy to get back to watching it since we kicked Scott Frost to the curb. Seems like we're rebuilding... but you know how many times I've gone through that spiel since Frank Solich was fired?
That doesn't surprise me... once the money infiltrates, everything gets shittier for the fans.I'm talking about College Football in general. The broadcasts now are very much like NFL broadcasts. They even have a two-minute warning at the end of each half to cram a few more commercials in.
As I pointed out a few days ago, SFA's showrunners did not possess one clue about what makes an interesting concept for a ST series, and certainly not one which would draw in a large part of the base, so it seems unlikely that Paramount--after fueling/funding this poor era of ST until it crashed into the Earth as a fiery disaster no one cared enough to worry about--will know what to "go back" to. This era of series would suggest the "back" is something they wanted to forget or reimagine until that which sent ST to the cultural Mount Rushmore is altered into something next to no one asked for.For paramount to go back to star trek. Not Harry Potter, not alien, not Buffy, not the walking dead etc. Just star trek.
As I pointed out a few days ago, SFA's showrunners did not possess one clue about what makes an interesting concept for a ST series, and certainly not one which would draw in a large part of the base, so it seems unlikely that Paramount--after fueling/funding this poor era of ST until it crashed into the Earth as a fiery disaster no one cared enough to worry about--will know what to "go back" to. This era of series would suggest the "back" is something they wanted to forget or reimagine until that which sent ST to the cultural Mount Rushmore is altered into something next to no one asked for.
I haven't seen many argue otherwise, other than TOS should be top of the Trek mountain.No matter what excuses peoole give me but the high water points for trek were during the 80s and 90s.
They do? Pretty sure people watch all sorts of Trek not just 80s and 90s.People say no one will watch that kind of trek
Kirtzman respected the source material far more than Berman ever did. Giving Romulans cloaking devices in the Enterprise area is by far and without doubt or question the biggest continuity screw up in all of Star trek.
Still waiting on that wonderful definition of Star Trek, it's tone anything else somewhat useful to giving constructive feedback to the studio.Oh, look, the song that never ends began yet again with the same, old, tired complaints about subjective quality over objective quality.
Kurtzman respected Star Trek the same way a runny nose respects a tissue. Sprinkling in references matters little when the tone is off.
Twenty years ago, people thought the same thing about Rick Berman.
More things change, the more they stay the same.
Here's the objective point: SFA was cancelled, and the ST franchise's fate (regarding confirmed new content) is up in the air--on the 60th anniversary year of the series that started it all. There's nothing good about that from a business or cultural standpoint.Oh, look, the song that never ends began yet again with the same, old, tired complaints about subjective quality over objective quality.
Here's another objective point - Strange New Worlds was canceled as well -- after season 4. They had to talk the network into a shortened final season. The truth is, this era of Star Trek, like the Berman era before it, has simply run its course.Here's the objective point: SFA was cancelled, and the ST franchise's fate (regarding confirmed new content) is up in the air--on the 60th anniversary year of the series that started it all. There's nothing good about that from a business or cultural standpoint.
You mean like with Enterprise?You never miss the water till the well runs dry.
Enterprise was a well slowly filling up. People just quit or died of dehydration while it was still empty.You mean like with Enterprise?
It's hilarious to me this idea that gets in to the inherent contradiction of opinions; "this stuff is ruining the franchise!" And "you'll miss it when it's gone."You mean like with Enterprise?
It's hilarious to me this idea that gets in to the inherent contradiction of opinions; "this stuff is ruining the franchise!" And "you'll miss it when it's gone."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.