• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Season 2 Teaser

I liked the Borg episode and the Ferengi episode. Acquisition was a fun episode, and as far as I'm concerned, more Jeffrey Combs, Ethan Phillips, and Clint Howard is never a bad thing.

I agree that those actors are great, but the episode itself is terrible.
I don't want to get into the crap "retcon" that this is an unrecorded/unknown contact with the Ferengi, clearly violating the intent behind the Ferengi's introduction in TNG (yeah, "Regeneration" kind of did it too with the Borg, as did Voyager before it with the Hansons/Seven, but Regeneration was good and the unknown nature of the Borg and security needs justify it better.)
Beyond that, the episode is just bad. The Ferengi don't have any of the depth or quality that DS9 developed for them, and additionally they all act like morons. Archer doesn't come off any better. It is as if the ENT writers only looked at TNG's Ferengi episodes (and maybe a synopsis of some DS9 ones) before writing the episode.
 
So, about the DSC Season 2 trailer.

DSC surpassed DS9 as my favorite Trek series during its first season because of its thematic elements, narrative structure, and unconventional subversion of the typical Star Trek fomula, and Season 2 looks like it's going to be following suit. Adding Christopher Pike to the ship's existing crew - and taking him away from the Enterprise - gives the writers a way to both honor existing Canon and simultaneously expand it, and also helps to further dispel the myth that the series isn't set in the "Prime Universe".

The "search for Spock" element of the story also gives us even more reason to care about Michael since it gives her a personal stake in this "hunt for the red bursts" that Pike commandeers the Discovery for, while also serving as a "hook" for new viewers who may not have watched the first season but might be drawn to the show because of the presence of the Enterprise.
 
The "search for Spock" element of the story also gives us even more reason to care about Michael since it gives her a personal stake in this "hunt for the red bursts"

I tend to think that "personal stakes" are overused and should be kept at a minimum, especially in a franchise about space exploration where most of the conflict is with the unknown. That said, when it's well made (Rogue One, for instance), then I don't mind.
 
They already that in Season 1.

I sure didn't see it. I saw them talk about how great she is, but it didn't translate at all in the story, then left on the dumbest thing ever: leaving a planet destroying bomb with a terrorist and telling us how great it all is.

Michael Burnham was character assassinated by her own writers. I actually feel sorry for Martin-Green being stuck with the material they gave her.
 
I do wonder why they would send a lightly armed science vessel to that kind of mystery when you have a Connie right there?
Perhaps the Enterprise is damaged. There were service pods of some sort flying around her.
 
BeatleStones.jpg


:techman:
That's a great pic! Stones were always copying the Beatles. ;)
 
What does Pike say after "He took leave"? I've listened half a dozen times and all I can make out is "mumble mumble, a question he didn't answer"
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top