There is always the balance of scientific truths utilized for setting viable social policies. It does sometimes go awry with people turning the screws too tight, regulations that are unnecessarily limiting or causing more problems for one business segment than others. Finding the balance is key... rather than ripping it all out from the roots as if it were a bad idea to begin with.I think the significance of that science at a time, even a long time, can be wrong is that while people admit it can be often its claims are treated as irrefutable fact and used as the basis for setting or changing policies regardless of how costly or destructive the policies may be. Seriously bearing in mind that (seemingly) well-supported scientific claims can be wrong of course would and should make people more reluctant to bear costs of a policy on the grounds that scientists say we must.
Scientists are sometimes wrong. Non-scientists are always wrong.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.