• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Scarlett Johansson naked pictures leaked

J. Allen said:
Admiral_Young said:
Or is high and mighty about not looking at them. To each their own...I took a look at them and thought they were okay, nothing speculator and they aren't meant to be that since they were taken and meant to be private. I don't really think you can judge private photos like you can if they were Playboy shots or something.
Click to expand...

Definitely a "to each their own" sentiment. I just find it interesting that someone is disturbed at the idea of looking at a lovely nude female celebrity's leaked pictures. Privacy? Yes, it is terrible that someone breached her privacy. Does that mean we're not going to look? Hell, no. Human curiosity is too much, particularly in regard to a noted celebrity.
Click to expand...

So it's okay to benefit from a crime that someone else committed? Hey, if you want to look, go for it. I'm not going pull out Godwin's Law here. But you're disturbed that some of us want to respect her privacy and aren't going to look at naked pictures of her against her will? Is that really such a difficult concept to grasp?
 
Again it has nothing to do with Ryan Reynolds. These are part of concentrated attack from a group of hackers. This is why the FBI is now involved in this. Hollywood Leaks is on twitter and already has over 10,000 followers but they don't post very often. They seem to have some kind of content towards these people and are using the means that everything should be free, including it would seem nekkid pictures. If that's the case they should post naked pictures of themselves (no I don't want to see them naked I'm trying to counter their point).

Anyway if you guys are interested in this you can google Hollywood Leaks and find out about them for yourselves. They've started cropping up all over the place now. There was even one site that interviewed a couple of their members...under their internet aliases of course.


No my point was that no one should be condemning or judging others for looking at pictures that media outlets themselves have posted. Of course it is a crime. No one here I don't think has argued that. As I said to each their own. If you wanna look at them, go for it. If you don't then don't. I don't really think the thread title intended to be a discussion of someone's ethics either.
 
Kelthaz said:
J. Allen said:
Admiral_Young said:
Or is high and mighty about not looking at them. To each their own...I took a look at them and thought they were okay, nothing speculator and they aren't meant to be that since they were taken and meant to be private. I don't really think you can judge private photos like you can if they were Playboy shots or something.
Click to expand...

Definitely a "to each their own" sentiment. I just find it interesting that someone is disturbed at the idea of looking at a lovely nude female celebrity's leaked pictures. Privacy? Yes, it is terrible that someone breached her privacy. Does that mean we're not going to look? Hell, no. Human curiosity is too much, particularly in regard to a noted celebrity.
Click to expand...

So it's okay to benefit from a crime that someone else committed? Hey, if you want to look, go for it. I'm not going pull out Godwin's Law here. But you're disturbed that some of us want to respect her privacy and aren't going to look at naked pictures of her against her will? Is that really such a difficult concept to grasp?
Click to expand...

Sorry, I updated my post to Jarod as an edit. Now, my point stands that most of us are too curious to not look when such an opportunity is presented, but yeah, it's not right to take advantage of someone else's breach of privacy. I was wrong in advocating that mindset.
 
I can't help but imagine how much better those naked pics would be if a professional photographer had done them with a real camera...:devil:

scarlettjohansson51.jpg
scarlettjohanssons.jpg
 
If these photos are as PG as they say they are, would it be a High Crime in the First Degree to post them here?
 
Admiral_Young said:
^ Indeed. I agree that it is disturbing that these people (and regular every day people) are being hacked and having their private material leaked on the internet but that doesn't mean we shouldn't look at them.
Click to expand...

... it doesn't? They're private photographs, stolen, which depict her in a manner she does not want strangers to see her. How does it follow that the theft and invasion of privacy was bad, but that it doesn't mean people shouldn't look at them?

I mean, look at them, don't look at them, whatever. But don't pretend that it isn't a violation of Johansson's rights if you do. At least have the decency to say, "Yeah, I looked at them. Yeah, I violated her rights in doing so. Too bad for her."
 
You just stated what I did earlier Sci, twice. I said look at them if you want, don't look at them if you don't want. I wasn't meaning to advocate that it is is all right to be viewing illegally obtained private photos of a person.
 
Another thing is, would this thread be about leaked pictures of naked Chase Masterson, this thread would have been closed by now. ;)
 
Yeah, because she is a member here. Johansson is not.

Now go be outraged and feel hard-done-by. Hey, why not even start a QSF thread so everybody knows just how unfair you think it all is. Justice must be done!
 
captcalhoun said:
i've found them. nice arse. and bewbs.

if you don't want the fakes, i suggest you search under 'everything', the news is appearing near the top of google results.
Click to expand...

Nice dumper indeed, her ta-ta's are nice too.

But I've always found her hot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top