Citation needed. Your opinion is not conclusive.
You just said the show needed a back to basics approach. The show got a back to basics approach. For you it didn't work. For me it did. You can't just assert your negative reactions as statements of fact.
I’m not. There’s plenty of discussions where the negative response to the lore changes have simply not been outweighed by an equivalent positive response. And certainly not in any depth.
And you have a different opinion of what ‘back to basics’ means in this context. It doesn’t mean ignoring or not using continuity, it largely means not fudging with it and getting it back to the equilibrium it had. I don’t even like Tennant as either of his Doctors particularly, but know that if you need a face for a hiatus Doctor, it’s going to be his. So ditch the TC as the Master telling some porkies (it’s better if it were The Master anyway, as it makes a *lot* more sense) stick Chef!Doctor into the 6B retcon with some added dazzle if they like (aborted timelines) get Gallifrey off its uppers and return the underlying core to its status quo with Tennants gurning mug as the Doctor, one and only and no Sword of Damocles spare in the back pocket (which his fourteenth currently is) Ideally that way you can leave the show on a high with general audiences too, cos they like the chap.
Now, there’s some possibilities around what is rumoured this series that may help, and make it possible to get the ducks in a row in some other manner, but if the toys are being put back in the box till someone else comes along, it’s better to make sure they are in the same shape as the current lot found them and in the right place.
If not, then that’s it. These last two Doctors eras have done more damage than anything JNT, or Cartmel, or Saward, ever even thought about. Well. Maybe not Saward.