• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

ROTJ vs ROTS - the showdown

What say you?

  • Return of the Jedi was better, Revenge of the Sith was okay too

    Votes: 27 42.9%
  • Return of the Jedi was better, Revenge of the Sith sucked

    Votes: 20 31.7%
  • Revenge of the Sith was better, Return of the Jedi was okay too

    Votes: 16 25.4%
  • Revenge of the Sith was better, Return of the Jedi sucked

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    63
The level of concentration would be the same (in the remaining body parts), but he would have half as many m-cs in his body now because he lost half his body.

Which is completely irrelevant, due to the fact that the midichlorian count as defined by TPM is what determines Force potential, not the "total amount of midichlorians in the body", a meaningless quantity which was never mentioned in the films or EU.
 
His final confrontation with Vader and the Emperor was handled reasonably well, but the musical chairs with actors depicting Anakin destroyed the emotional impact of Luke taking off the helmet and the ghost scene later.

Yeah, I hated how the lack of a change in actors for the unmasking scene destroyed the emotional impact of the scene. And don't even get me started on the eyebrows.

Were you just... advocating replacing Sebastian Shaw completely with Hayden Christensen in ROTJ?

Nah. I'd replace both with the guy in TCW, except that sadly he doesn't exist as flesh & blood, so that might look a little weird. :rommie: TCW Anakin is the first time I've really felt that the character was the same guy as Vader and someone who could have been Luke's father. Shaw was just a fat old guy who didn't synch up at all with the notion that Vader had been a kick-ass warrior at some point in his life, and we all know the problems with Christensen.

No, I was expressing incredulity at the idea that Hayden could ruin a scene he's not even in.

The point was that the emotional impact is reduced because the ghost isn't Sebastian Shaw anymore. And I agree with that.

While my point is that neither actor was right for the part. Shaw and Christensen both ruined their scenes. :rommie: Shaw had the benefit of less screen time and therefore less ruination (although since the moment was pivotal, that counts for more.)

I think I've figured out why some people prefer RotS to RotJ. The original trilogy is like you're happily breathing clean air (ANH & ESB) and then someone comes along and farts (RotJ) -- your natural reaction is "Urgh, you befouled my air!". The prequel trilogy is like you're drowning (TPM & AotC) and then you finally surface and breathe in a lungful of air polluted with industrial fumes (RotS) -- your natural reaction is "Oxygen! Sweet, sweet oxygen!" Even though, viewed objectively, the industrial fumes are much worse for you than the fart.
:rommie: :bolian:

our nominal hero Obi-Wan Kenobi does barely anything important
He kills General Grievous and defeats and cripples the Chosen One :wtf:
And what did either of those things ultimately accomplish? Nothing, really. Did he hurt Palpatine's schemes in any way?

The good-guy characters in the PT accomplished nothing, which wouldn't have been all that bad, since it was supposed to be an overarching tragedy, but they should have been allowed to make a better accounting of themselves, to be given the opportunity of knowing what was going on in time to come up with intelligent countermeasures. And if those countermeasures didn't work, it should have been because Palps was just too smart for them. The PT really made the good guys look like total chumps who didn't lose so much as, they were still in the locker room when the game ended. It's a pretty boring game when only one side is ever on the field.

If Anakin was at full strength he would have turned on Sidious almost immediately; would he have won?
I've never bought the bizarre argument that Vader didn't turn on the Emperor immediately because he was "too weak." If he had a mind at all, and it was still his own, he still should have been plotting against Sidious. The minute he was able to strike back, he should have done so.

At some point in that 20 year span, Vader would have become strong enough. Since he thought his children were dead, it makes no sense that he'd be waiting for them to grow up. He should be seething with anger, and should have struck just as soon as he was able. Judging from his vigor in ANH, he would have been able much sooner than 20 years later.

What held him back was a feeling of loyalty towards the Emperor, and it's a mystery why he'd feel loyalty to a guy he made an alliance with, who didn't live up to his end of the bargain. The Mortis Arc showed that the Dark Side works at least in some cases - and as far as we know, in all cases - by mind control. Not a very satisfying explanation, but it works logically at least to explain Vader's behavior.

Even with his arms and legs chopped off, Anakin's torso is bigger than Yoda's whole body. Since he's Mr. Midichorlian, he should have still been immensely powerful. And that's not even addressing the problem that equating power with something as mundane as body mass is absurd. Power should be equated with something more elevated, like purity of spirit. This is just another example of how Lucas drained all the magic, myth and mystery from Star Wars with the PT.

God I hate midi-chlorians. Lucas should have been shot out of a cannon... into the sun for that one.
Yeah pretty much. :rommie:
 
Last edited:
I think Hayden is a good match for Anakin/Vader in the physical sense-his face certainly bears a resemblance to Mark Hammil (More so than Jake Lloyd), and he is fairly tall and imposing, at least in SITH where he's bulked up a lot.

It's his voice/delivery that really needed work. He was apparentally trying to mimic the way James Earl Jones talks, but it came out as sounding monotone instead of natural...
 
Power should be equated with something more elevated, like purity of spirit. This is just another example of how Lucas drained all the magic, myth and mystery from Star Wars with the PT.

And that is just the usual example of the PT being fallaciously blamed for something that happened in the OT. ROTJ established all the way back in 1983 that strength in the Force runs in the Skywalker family, regardless of "purity of spirit". And strangely enough, no one ever said that the "magic, myth and mystery" had been drained from SW when that happened. Because there were no poop-stepping Gungans involved.
 
Shaw was just a fat old guy who didn't synch up at all with the notion that Vader had been a kick-ass warrior at some point in his life, and we all know the problems with Christensen.

Yeah but at least Shaw projected a kind, warm, fatherly feeling on screen (and, appropriately enough, he also seemed about the right age as his old friend Obi-Wan).

Christensen just looked like the same dark and creepy dude we saw in the prequels. lol

Plus, it always felt to me like the Vader in ROTJ was a bit older and slower anyway for some reason. From the way he moved, I never got the sense that there was some super fit and muscular athlete under that costume.
 
Christensen looked dark and creepy because they didn't actually film footage of him acting as the redeemed Anakin, they just took test footage from ROTS and digitally placed his head on Sebastian Shaw's body.

Vader moved so slow because he was wearing stiff, bulky armor, underneath which was a ruined and practically useless physical body.
 
(and, appropriately enough, he also seemed about the right age as his old friend Obi-Wan).

Although it's not a rule, masters tend to be older than their padawans. As of TESB we found out that Luke's father, the Jedi who had been Obi-Wan's friend, and Darth Vader, the young Jedi who had been a pupil of Obi-Wan's and had helped the Empire hunt down and destroy the Jedi, were the same person. Thus, going by ANH and TESB alone, it could be argued that Obi-Wan and Anakin were not the same age.
 
Return of the Jedi though it wasn't an excellent movie.

Jedi hat the original cast.. that alone makes it win over Sith by a good margin but it also wrapped up the whole movie universe up in a neat way.

Sith had only a few good scenes.. the death of the Jedi by Order 66 was pretty emotional (a first for me through the entire prequels that i cared about anything), the last confrontation of Obi Wan and Anakin was good too (especially if you remember how they left each other for the last time as best friends and what happened in between to turn them to mortal enemies) and the end that leads directly into A New Hope.

Apart from that the whole movie was on the level of the prequels meaning they sucked for the most part.

I know that the original movies aren't Oscar worthy either be it the story or the characters which are typical archetypes but it has been done so well and with such charm (no less due to Harrison Ford as Han Solo.. one of the best movie characters of all time) that it beats out everything that came after in the Star Wars universe.
 
I know that the original movies aren't Oscar worthy

They did win various Oscars, and the original movie was nominated for Best Picture.

Temis the Vorta said:
Shaw had the benefit of less screen time and therefore less ruination (although since the moment was pivotal, that counts for more.)

Since when did Shaw have less screen time in ROTJ than Hayden?
 
Re. midichlorians -- given that they can get Anakin's midichlorian count from a small sample of blood scraped from a cut in TPM, I think it's pretty clear that it's concentration (i.e. midichlorians per square cm) rather than volume (i.e. total number of midichlorians) that matters. There is a certain internal logic to that: midichlorians connect you to the Force, so a larger person would need more midichlorians in total to have that same level of connection.

I think Hayden is a good match for Anakin/Vader in the physical sense-his face certainly bears a resemblance to Mark Hammil (More so than Jake Lloyd)
Ooh, no, I disagree. To me, Hayden Christiansen is the odd one out: Mark Hamill's face is rounder in shape than his, and much closer to Lloyd's and Shaw's. Plus, Lloyd looked like he could've been Shaw as a child -- Christiansen doesn't look like either of them.

It's his voice/delivery that really needed work. He was apparentally trying to mimic the way James Earl Jones talks, but it came out as sounding monotone instead of natural...
Really? He doesn't sound mid-Atlantic like Jones's Vader voice.
 
Re. midichlorians -- given that they can get Anakin's midichlorian count from a small sample of blood scraped from a cut in TPM, I think it's pretty clear that it's concentration (i.e. midichlorians per square cm) rather than volume (i.e. total number of midichlorians) that matters.

It also helps that dialogue later in the film explicitly refers to cell concentration.
 
i voted RotS, because it

i still liked RotJ but not any more

One thing about Vader getting revenge on the Emperor --- at least for a while, it would seem that Kenobi was the problem. Kenobi is the reason why Anakin was hurt so bad....and wile from "a certain point of view", Kenobi was being "kind" by not killing his friend, Anakin could consider it being purposefully hurtful to Anakin.


The Emperor came and saved Anakin. He could have easily blamed the reason why Padme died on Kenobi bringing her to Mustafar. If Kenobi hadn't interfered, Padme would have been alive.

also - i wonder how much of the Force tricks have to do with the body and how much the mind. Telekinesis , such as choking, might be mostly mental. But stronger abilities like Force Lightning, require more of the body. Also, with Anakin beocming more machine, wouldn't the Force Lightning be even more deadly to him?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top