It hadn't been fired yet, so they needed to site-in the aim and you can't do that without firing it once, having it miss, and then knowing what adjustments to make. 

although I'd still like to know what happened to that Death Star frame at the end of RotS - was that a prototype or *the* Death Star and it took just 20 years to finish it... because it looked close to finished back then...),
The Death Star was supposed to destroy the Citadel and the surrounding city, so why did they fire somewhere else and let the resulting blast consume the city? The real reason is that you don't want to kill off Jyn with a direct hit so the movie had to set up what we actually got, but what would make for a good in-story explanation?
It was the Death Star. It took 20 years to complete. Mostly due to problems completing the Superlaser, as it requires rare large Kyber Crystals, and various people kept blowing up shipments of huge ones that would have gone to the Death Star (Obi-wan and Anakin take out one near the end of the Clone Wars, and the Ghost takes out another about four years before the events of Rogue One. The frame was so the construction has something to work within.
The Force is strong with this one....I honestly enjoyed it more than TFA.
I got a good chuckle out of that exchange, although I didn't quite pick up what had been discontinued. I was just amused by the casual conversation.
Pablo Hidalgo has confirmed Mustafar........I just assumed it's Mustafar, because how many lava planets are there associated wirh Vader?
Kinda makes sense that he would build his vacation resort on his second birth planet.
How is that contradictory with what's seen in ANH? The Star Destroyer is blowing the hell out of Leia's ship, the Stormtroopers board it and kill numerous crew; Vader kills the Captain, takes the Princess prisoner, and will have none of the Captain's or Leia's shit. Vader knows full well what they did.The ending makes no sense with regards to ANH. The Imperials literally watched Leia's ship launch from a rebel battlecruiser in an active battle. There is no subtlety there. No plausible deniability.
How is that contradictory with what's seen in ANH? The Star Destroyer is blowing the hell out of Leia's ship, the Stormtroopers board it and kill numerous crew; Vader kills the Captain, takes the Princess prisoner, and will have none of the Captain's or Leia's shit. Vader knows full well what they did.
The only reason Leia and Captain Antilles possibly think they can get away with lying is that neither of them actually saw Vader attacking at Scariff. All of the crew (except one guy) that directly saw Vader taking out the soldiers were killed. Leia and Captain Antilles never saw him and possibly thought they could still indignantly BS there way out of trouble.
She's caught and desperate, what has she got to lose? Remember at this point the Senate had just been dissolved, so she's probably operating under the assumption that diplomatic immunity is still a thing and that she can throw her credentials around and still get some legal cover even after committing a crime. Plus, even if you did commit the crime, why admit to it and incriminate yourself? She might be under the impression that the courts are still a thing too and that she'll get whatever passes for a "fair" trial in the Imperial legal system.I would disagree with this. In ANH Leia's cover is that she is on a diplomatic mission from Alderaan. How is that going to work or even be perceived to be real based on the ending we see in Rogue one? How could Leia really say that with a straight face given how Tantive IV (her ship) is shown in this movie? I would say more, but I don't want to spoil the ending.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.