Somebody owes somebody a smiley...
I'm pretty sure Andy had labeled those as emergency flush vents in some diagrams of the ship back in 1987. Not a lot changed over the years; most of the shapes on the design are recognizable as specific Starfleet equipment.
Rick
Yeah, I'm also wondering what you'd want "flush vents" for on a spaceship. Generally you want a ship to be a closed system where everything is recycled. The only thing you'd want to eject from the ship would be reaction mass for thrust. Though I guess you could justify venting parts of the ship to vacuum in an emergency.
Or they could be some sort of emergency purge system for the main shuttlebay. If the the shuttlebay forcefield fails, atmosphere from the shuttlebay would push the ship rapidly forward (as in "Cause & Effect"), maybe, in semi-controled situations, atmosphere is vented out that way to maintain some sort of relative station-keeping...
Yep.Except "Cause and Effect" got the physics wrong. The amount of thrust you'd get from venting the atmosphere of the main shuttlebay would be trivial compared to the inertia of a humongous Galaxy-Class starship.
Or they could be some sort of emergency purge system for the main shuttlebay. If the the shuttlebay forcefield fails, atmosphere from the shuttlebay would push the ship rapidly forward (as in "Cause & Effect"), maybe, in semi-controled situations, atmosphere is vented out that way to maintain some sort of relative station-keeping...
Except "Cause and Effect" got the physics wrong. The amount of thrust you'd get from venting the atmosphere of the main shuttlebay would be trivial compared to the inertia of a humongous Galaxy-Class starship. I once had a scene in an original piece of fiction involving a loss of atmosphere from a space habitat (a much larger quantity of atmosphere than the E-D's main hangar could contain, even in proportion to the mass of the habitat), and I intended it to impart a considerable amount of thrust, but when I actually did the math, I found that the thrust would be inconsequential. So I had to replace the whole scene.
Or they could be some sort of emergency purge system for the main shuttlebay. If the the shuttlebay forcefield fails, atmosphere from the shuttlebay would push the ship rapidly forward (as in "Cause & Effect"), maybe, in semi-controled situations, atmosphere is vented out that way to maintain some sort of relative station-keeping...
Except "Cause and Effect" got the physics wrong. The amount of thrust you'd get from venting the atmosphere of the main shuttlebay would be trivial compared to the inertia of a humongous Galaxy-Class starship. I once had a scene in an original piece of fiction involving a loss of atmosphere from a space habitat (a much larger quantity of atmosphere than the E-D's main hangar could contain, even in proportion to the mass of the habitat), and I intended it to impart a considerable amount of thrust, but when I actually did the math, I found that the thrust would be inconsequential. So I had to replace the whole scene.
I am not even going to attempt to argue against math.
Well, if atmospheric thrust is minor compared to the intertia of the E-D, it either has to be for environmental venting, radioactive waste in an emergency, or maybe some sort of emergency heating/cooling system for the main computer core depending on external conditions. Or maybe some sort of venting system for the saucer module torpedo launcher in independent flight mode. Or maybe all the phaser coolant gas for the upper phaser array can be purged in an emergency. It is fun to speculate...
If the the shuttlebay forcefield fails, atmosphere from the shuttlebay would push the ship rapidly forward (as in "Cause & Effect")
it either has to be for environmental venting, radioactive waste in an emergency, or maybe some sort of emergency heating/cooling system for the main computer core depending on external conditions. Or maybe some sort of venting system for the saucer module torpedo launcher in independent flight mode. Or maybe all the phaser coolant gas for the upper phaser array can be purged in an emergency. It is fun to speculate...
Perhaps it was the Emergency Child Venting System for when Picard was having a bad day?
Exactly correct.Or they could be some sort of emergency purge system for the main shuttlebay. If the the shuttlebay forcefield fails, atmosphere from the shuttlebay would push the ship rapidly forward (as in "Cause & Effect"), maybe, in semi-controled situations, atmosphere is vented out that way to maintain some sort of relative station-keeping...
Except "Cause and Effect" got the physics wrong. The amount of thrust you'd get from venting the atmosphere of the main shuttlebay would be trivial compared to the inertia of a humongous Galaxy-Class starship. I once had a scene in an original piece of fiction involving a loss of atmosphere from a space habitat (a much larger quantity of atmosphere than the E-D's main hangar could contain, even in proportion to the mass of the habitat), and I intended it to impart a considerable amount of thrust, but when I actually did the math, I found that the thrust would be inconsequential. So I had to replace the whole scene.
I think I gently objected to this business about the air when we were doing the episode. Even if the entire shuttle bay (or all three) were vented explosively, you're only talking about 14 psi or so, so maybe (if one works out the total square footage of the bay openings) a million or so pounds of very short push vs. 4.5 million metric tonnes of ship. I wouldn't use the word "rapidly" to characterize the ship's movement. But, of course, they were going for the drama of it all.![]()
Yeah, that's my thought as well. Most anything gaseous or liquid that needs to get tossed can go through the vents. Kinda like skin pores, lymph system, etc. Lots of different systems and subsystems tied to pipes heading outside.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.